 |
Cowley County Bridges
[Note: As this file has grown and grown, I decided it would be best to split it into two segments. The first (CowleyCountyBridges_A) will cover for the most part the bridges in Arkansas City crossing the Walnut River and Arkansas River. The second file (CowleyCountyBridges_B) will cover for the most part the bridges in Winfield crossing the creek north of Winfield, which was called by some Dutch Creek and by others Timber Creek, and the bridges that crossed the Walnut River south of Winfield and west of Winfield. I will mention other bridges under file “A” in an attempt to keep the Winfield bridges separate. The articles on bridges are not very satisfactory pertaining to the early years. I was confronted with the gap in coverage by early newspapers up to the period of 1876 when they were microfilmed. There were also gaps in papers at various times. I also put other bridges such as Oxford in this file and did not repeat them in secondary file (Winfield). At times I did repeat items that pertained to Cowley County. MAW October 3, 2000.]
An article in 1880 claims that the following was the first bridge in Cowley County...
[OLDEST BRIDGE IN COUNTY, BUILT IN 1872 - FELL!]
Winfield Courier, August 12, 1880.
Last Friday afternoon the old bridge near Wood, Jettinger & Co.’s mill, fell in. It has been condemned for over a year as unsafe, and persons who used it were notified that they did it at their own risk. This was the first bridge built in the county, and has stood there since 1872. One of Al. Requa’s teams had crossed the bridge only a few moments before it fell.
Determining which was the first bridge built in Cowley County cannot be done by me. There are just too many gaps in newspaper coverage of the early years. MAW
Part A.
[Concentrates on Bridges at Arkansas City.]
BRIDGES AT ARKANSAS CITY.
1870
Natural Bridge.
Excerpts...
Emporia News, April 22, 1870.
FROM CRESWELL.
CRESWELL, April 9th, 1870.
On the east side of the Walnut, about a mile from town, in a rough, rocky ravine, there is a natural bridge; it is a perfect one, with not even the keystone lacking. The highest part of the arch is about ten feet above the bed of the ravine; it has about twenty feet span. The top of the bridge is level and just wide enough for teams to cross on; and if it had been made for that purpose, it could hardly have been made better than it is. The road to Grouse will probably pass over it.
A few feet above the bridge there is a round basin hollowed out of the solid rock; it is about twenty feet across and about three feet deep, and is filled with clear water that runs out of a little cave through a trough worn in the rock. On the side opposite the bridge the basin is half surrounded by a semi-circular rock ten or fifteen feet high, and a few rods further up the ravine there is a beautiful little cave, with a basin similar to the one I have tried to describe. It just fills the bottom of the cave. These were discovered by Captain Norton while looking for a route to the Grouse. Further up the ravine the geologist will find the book he likes to read. MAX FAWCETT.
Excerpt...
Walnut Valley Times, June 3, 1870. Front Page.
[Correspondence of the Times.]
LETTER FROM CRESWELL.
Among the many projects in view, however, I will mention that of constructing a bridge across the Arkansas. . . . T. A. WILKINSON.
1871
Excerpts...
Walnut Valley Times, March 24, 1871.
COUNTY BONDS FOR BRIDGES.
We call the attention of our citizens to an act of the last Legislature authorizing the counties of Butler and Cowley to issue bonds to build bridges, which has become a law by publication in the Kansas Weekly Commonwealth.
The bill was gotten up and put through by Messrs. Baker and Manning, representatives from the two counties interested, and provides that said counties may have an election, on the question of issuing bonds in the sum of thirty-thousand dollars to build bridges in the Walnut Valley.
It does not specify the time of the election, nor the particular locality of the bridges, only that they must be in the Walnut Valley.
We must say that this is a remarkable bill, and passed in a most remarkable manner. We were not aware that any petition had been sent to the legislature asking for such a bill. In fact, we never heard such a project talked about, along the Walnut Valley, and it is certainly not a favorite project with the people off of the valley.
Walnut Valley Times, May 5, 1871.
BRIDGE BONDS.
So far as we have talked with the people from various parts of the county, the general feeling seems to be one of opposition to the issue of bonds for the building of bridges. In a very short time, the railroad will have reached Newton, on the Little Arkansas, just seventy-one miles northwest from here in a straight line, while Florence is eighty-five miles, and Cottonwood Falls full a hundred miles distant. So far as mail and railroad matters are concerned, we shall not long need the bridges. We are now, as heretofore, in favor of immediately building them; but the utter impossibility of obtaining any assurance in regard to the equitable division of the money, stands in the way. We think the project will be defeated. Arkansas Traveler.
First Bridge at Arkansas City Across Arkansas River: A Pontoon Bridge.
Walnut Valley Times, May 26, 1871.
Arkansas City is building a pontoon bridge across the Arkansas River at that point.
Walnut Valley Times, June 9, 1871.
The people of Arkansas City are putting a pontoon bridge across the Arkansas River at this place. They propose making their town the initial point for the Fort Sill mail and stage route.
Emporia News, August 11, 1871.
A number-one truss bridge is to be built at once at Arkansas City.
Emporia News, September 22, 1871.
Mr. Hobson, of Fort Scott, the contractor for building the bridge across the Arkansas River, is in town. Arkansas City Traveler.
Second Bridge at Arkansas City Across Arkansas River.
A Truss Bridge.
Walnut Valley Times, October 13, 1871.
LABORERS WANTED.
Another surveying outfit is to be recruited at Arkansas City, within the next ten days, and in a few weeks thirty hands can secure work on the Arkansas River Truss Bridge.
Walnut Valley Times, December 1, 1871.
Cowley County.
[FROM THE ARKANSAS TRAVELER.]
OUR BRIDGE.
The bridge across the Arkansas is to be built immediately. The lumber is nearly all out, and teams are now at work hauling it down to the river bank. Mr. Hobson, the contractor, is in town and proposes to push matters.
1872
Excerpt...
Walnut Valley Times, January 19, 1872.
[From the Arkansas TRAVELER.]
OUR BRIDGE.
The work on the Arkansas Bridge has been somewhat delayed, owing to the difficulty of obtaining the long timbers. Parties on Grouse contracted to furnish these, but trees of the right size were not to be found. Finally the timbers were ordered from Michigan, pine being substituted for native lumber, and they are now on the road. Mr. Hobson writes that he will commence work as soon as they arrive. The native lumber is nearly all on the ground.
Excerpt...
Walnut Valley Times, January 26, 1872.
[From the Arkansas TRAVELER.]
Cowley County.
Work on the Arkansas River bridge commences today. The pile-driver arrived a few days ago, and Mr. Hobson, the contractor, is expected every day. Laborers desiring work had better call on E. P. Kinne or on Dr. Keith, immediately.
Excerpt...
Walnut Valley Times, February 2, 1872.
FROM ARKANSAS CITY.
An old friend of ours, writing from Arkansas City under date of the 23rd says:
Work has been commenced on the bridge across the Arkansas River at that place.
Excerpts...
Winfield Messenger, Friday, July 26, 1872.
Notes of Wagon Travel.
WINFIELD, KANS., June 28, 1872.
TO THE KANSAS TRIBUNE.
Arkansas City is perched high and dry on a hill dividing the Walnut and Arkansas, about two miles above the junction of the rivers. We stopped overnight among the hospitable people of this fine town, and from Mr. Walton learn that they have an organized city, and the election of officers comes off in a few days.
A fine bridge is just completed across the Arkansas here, and the trade and travel south and west will always make this a prominent place and a good trading point.
1873
[REPORT FROM CORRESPONDENT AT BOLTON TOWNSHIP.]
Winfield Courier, Thursday, June 26, 1873.
Our bridge toll in going from here to the City and back is the most grievous burden we have to bear. Every time we want a box of matches, or a bar of soap, we have to pay from 25 to 50 cents for bridge fare, yet a majority of the voters of the two townships at the late election declared that the bridge should not be free. At Oxford the toll for a two-horse team is 35 cents, here it is 50 cents; why is there this difference?
[BRIDGE ELECTION.]
Winfield Courier, Thursday, August 28, 1873.
On the 30th inst., the residents of Bolton Township will vote on the proposition to buy and make free the bridge across the Arkansas River. Since the price has been reduced to $4,000, it has many substantial men to support it. The tax as it is, is a great burden, and falls very heavy upon men of small means. Winter is coming on, the river will be unsafe, cold, and dangerous for the health of horses, and it does look practicable that to purchase the bridge would be best. Traveler.
Winfield Courier, Thursday, September 18, 1873.
[From the Arkansas City Traveler.]
Our Township Trustee declines to sign the Arkansas River Bridge bonds on account of the decrease of the value of the bridge since the bonds were voted.
Winfield Courier, Thursday, October 2, 1873.
[From the Arkansas City Traveler.]
The Arkansas River Bridge was made free last Saturday.
1875
Winfield Courier, September 30, 1875.
Traveler Items.
The plank has been purchased for the floor of the Arkansas River bridge, and it will be repaired soon.
Excerpt...
Winfield Courier, December 16, 1875.
Arkansas City is finely located at the confluence of the Walnut and Arkansas rivers, near
the south line of the state. Near this place both the Arkansas and Walnut rivers are bridged.
The first summation of early bridges in Cowley County was given in 1876.
1876
CENTENNIAL ISSUE.
WINFIELD COURIER, THURSDAY, JANUARY 6, 1876.
BRIDGES.
There are five bridges in the county, all wood structures. Two span the Walnut near Winfield, built in 1872, at a cost of $6,000 each; one crosses Timber Creek north of Winfield, costing $2,500, built in 1873; one crosses the Arkansas River south of Arkansas City, at an expense of $15,000, built in 1872; the fifth crosses the Walnut River east of Arkansas City, at a cost of $5,000, erected in 1873.
Arkansas City Traveler, March 8, 1876.
Notice to Lumbermen.
Sealed bids will be received by W. D. Mowry, Township Clerk of Creswell Township, at Arkansas City, until April 10th, 1876, at 3 o’clock p.m., for (3,000) three thousand feet of two-inch elm plank, ten feet long; said plank to be furnished at the Arkansas River bridge, near Arkansas City, by the 1st day of May, 1876.
By order of Township Board of Creswell Township.
Cowley County Democrat, Thursday, April 6, 1876.
It is stated that W. J. Hobson of Wichita, the gentleman who built our bridges here, failed in the dry goods trade; if so, we are sorry, as Mr. Hobson was a live energetic man.
Excerpt...
Cowley County Democrat, April 6, 1876.
Arkansas City Items.
The Arkansas River is higher than it has ever been since the white man settled in its valleys. In some places it only lacks a few feet of running over its banks, and is still rising. It is thought if it rises much more, the bridge south of town will be materially damaged.
Arkansas City Traveler, April 26, 1876.
NOTICE TO CARPENTERS.
The contract for laying the plank on the north half of the Arkansas River Bridge, will be let to the lowest bidder. Bids received until May 15th. WILL MOWRY, Clerk.
[LOCAL/STATE NEWS.]
Arkansas City Traveler, May 10, 1876.
A general cry is now made for the County to put up and sustain bridges across the Walnut, Dutch, and Grouse Creeks.
Arkansas City Traveler, May 10, 1876.
THE WALNUT OUT OF ITS BANKS!
THREE BRIDGES WASHED AWAY.
The Crops Under Water.
The greatest rise of the Walnut River ever known by the residents of this place was last Saturday afternoon and night. It is asserted by those who watched it that the river rose four feet in one hour, and the amount of drift wood, saw logs, rails, etc., carried down was immense. Not until late in the day was any danger apprehended to the bridge at the Water Mills, but Sunday morning brought the news that the bridge had been washed away. The loss will be greatly felt, as it is doubtful whether another will replace it soon. It cost this township $4,500 only three years ago, besides the additional expense of repairs since and interest on the bonds. The abutments remain, however, and to replace it now would not cost more than one-half what it did before.
Particles of the structure lodged on Callahan’s farm and on the island at the mouth of the Walnut, but we do not know what condition they are in. The bottoms from the east edge of the town site nearly to the river are under water, and the water in the woods at the mill would swim a horse. In many places large patches of wheat are entirely submerged, and fences, wood, and lumber have been washed away.
At Winfield we learn the lower bridge across the Walnut was taken down the stream; also, the bridge across Dutch Creek. The fall of rain at this place was but three and one-half inches, but it had the appearance of being much more up the Walnut.
Near Salt City they experienced another hail storm, entirely destroying two fields of wheat. We have not heard from Grouse Creek and other localities, but expect the damage will be considerable. It seems as though the bridge across the Walnut at this place cannot be dispensed with, as nearly one-fourth of the year the river is not fordable, yet there is a strong prejudice against bonding the township for any purpose.
Arkansas City Traveler, May 17, 1876.
The delegates from Creswell, Pleasant Valley, and other townships, were prevented from attending the Convention at Dexter, on account of high water, and no bridge across the Walnut.
Arkansas City Traveler, May 17, 1876.
Now the question arises shall the bridge be built east of town or put up on the old piers?
Arkansas City Traveler, May 17, 1876.
BOUND TO GO.
A young girl of sweet sixteen was seen running up and down the banks of the Walnut in a frantic manner last Saturday, exclaiming “I’d give five dollars to see that show.” The river was up and the bridge down; she on one side of the raging Walnut while her sweetness was on the other. Her efforts were finally crowned with success by securing the aid of a boat, but lo, when they arrived in town to their moral horror they found the show was at Winfield, and again she gave vent to: “I’d give five dollars to see that show.”
Arkansas City Traveler, May 17, 1876.
See the card of Mr. Silas Parker, carpenter and builder, late of Boston, Massachusetts. Mr. Parker is a good workman, and will work to suit the times. He can erect a claim shanty or a fine mansion as quick and reasonable as anyone in the County. Try him.
AD: SILAS PARKER, CARPENTER AND BUILDER, ARKANSAS CITY, KANSAS.
Houses, granaries, bridges, and all kinds of carpenter’s work done on short notice and reasonable terms. Leave orders at the Central Avenue Hotel.
Arkansas City Traveler, May 17, 1876.
Considerable lumber and iron belonging to the Walnut Bridge has been found along the stream. Probably one-third of the lumber. The piers remain permanent.
Arkansas City Traveler, May 24, 1876.
The ford near the Walnut Bridge has washed out so much that teams have to cross at Harmon’s ford.
BRIDGE ACROSS WALNUT LEADING TO NEWMAN MILL.
Arkansas City Traveler, May 24, 1876.
“The dam at Newman’s Mill has been washed around on the west side so that the whole current of the river passes through the break. They are at work on it, and expect to have it repaired soon. With the Walnut River Bridge being gone, things look desolate about the mill at present.”
Arkansas City Traveler, May 24, 1876.
BRIDGE.
Mr. Chamberlain, Trustee of Creswell Township, informs us he has recovered two-thirds of the Walnut River Bridge timber.
Arkansas City Traveler, May 24, 1876.
THE DAM AT NEWMAN’S MILL has been washed around on the west side so that the whole current of the river passes through the break. They are at work on it, and expect to have it repaired soon. With the bridge being gone, things look desolate about the mill at present.
Arkansas City Traveler, May 24, 1876.
Our Oxford correspondent, writing on the 8th says: Friday night and Saturday morning the big rain fell. It was between six and eight inches on the level. Usually quiet little ravines arose to a depth of fifteen feet in a few hours and swept bridges, culverts, and roads. Lightning killed two horses for Mr. Houser, two miles south of town. Two mules standing in the stable at the same time escaped unhurt. The stable, with fifteen bushels of wheat, also plows, harrows, and other farming implements, were consumed by the fire. Mr. Kelly, living two miles southwest of town, had a mule killed by lightning. The wheat is not injured to any extent. Corn will be late in consequence of the heavy rain. Winfield Courier.
Arkansas City Traveler, May 31, 1876.
A meeting was held in District No. 33 (east of the Walnut), last week, at which it was resolved that the people of that section were opposed to voting bonds for bridges, and calling on the County to erect one. There is no denying that the Townships east and west reap a great benefit from the bridges of this Township, yet if the County refuses to build the bridge, do the people propose to do without it? We could not ask the County to bridge the Walnut at this place without favoring the one or both, at Winfield; and if they build these, then Lazette and Silverdale will want the Grouse bridged. If the distribution could be made equal throughout the County, we should favor County bridges.
Arkansas City Traveler, May 31, 1876.
How about that Walnut bridge? We should like to have the farmers express themselves, as they are in the majority, and will determine any proposition.
Unnamed Bridge North of Arkansas City.
Arkansas City Traveler, June 14, 1876.
We call the attention of the Road Overseer to the small bridge north of town near L. C. Norton’s. Col. McMullen’s horse got one leg through it last week, and others are complaining.
Arkansas City Traveler, July 12, 1876.
The south side of the Arkansas River bridge, belonging to Bolton Township, is to be repaired with pine lumber. The whole bridge needs new flooring.
Arkansas City Traveler, July 26, 1876.
M. A. FELTON and Will. Alexander, who went to Wichita, the 15th of this month, for the purpose of rafting lumber down the Arkansas, returned last Friday evening, but left the rafts up the river some fifteen miles. They built two rafts, and putting 4,000 feet of pine lumber on each, started on the morning of Tuesday, July 18, but made very slow progress, being on the sand bars a great portion of the time. They think if they had had more help, the venture would have proved successful. As it is, all the lumber can be saved and put to the use intended for it: that of repairing the bridge across the Arkansas at this place.
Arkansas City Traveler, August 2, 1876.
We understand that the much needed repairs on the Arkansas River Bridge are finally being made.
Arkansas City Traveler, August 2, 1876.
It is time some active measures were taken with reference to constructing a new bridge across the Walnut. We believe its former location is the best of any yet proposed, all things considered; and it certainly would be cheaper to build the old piers four or five feet higher than to erect new ones entire. The absence of a bridge over the Walnut at this place is a serious injury to the business interests of our people, for during high water (and it has been a frequent occurrence in the past six months) the farmers east of us must necessarily do their trading elsewhere.
[A. A. NEWMAN: OFFER TO BUILD THE PIERS OF OLD BRIDGE HIGHER.]
Arkansas City Traveler, August 9, 1876.
We are informed that Mr. A. A. Newman has offered to build the piers of the old bridge four or five feet higher if the township will bear the expense of putting a new bridge across. This is an offer our people cannot afford to ignore, as the expense on their part will be slight—a mere song, in fact—compared with that of building a new one entire. Considerable of the iron and other material of the former structure can be utilized with little work, thus throwing a large portion of the cost on Mr. Newman. Our businessmen should not remain blind to their interests any longer, but see to it that the bridge is built, either through the voting of bonds or private subscriptions, as its absence only serves to drive trade to Winfield. It can hardly be called policy to save at the spigot and lose at the bung.
Arkansas City Traveler, August 30, 1876.
A PETITION is in circulation asking the proper officers to call an election to vote on the proposition of issuing $2,000 in bonds to rebuild the bridge across the Walnut. If the bridge can be properly built for $2,000, then we say put it up, for already it has been a detriment to that amount. It is claimed that the piers can be built four feet higher, and the bridge put up in a safe condition, for that amount, but we doubt it.
Arkansas City Traveler, August 30, 1876.
BRIDGE DOWN. We learn that one span of the bridge across the Arkansas at El Paso is down on the water, caused by the sinking of a pier.
Excerpt...
[COMMUNICATION FROM “BULL DOG”—BOLTON TOWNSHIP.]
Arkansas City Traveler, September 6, 1876.
Our bridge to your city is sadly in need of repair. Planking has been going on for three or four weeks, and it is yet unfinished. Please hurry them up.
Arkansas City Traveler, September 6, 1876.
The lumber for the new floor in the Arkansas Bridge is being delivered by Mr. L. Lippmann. There is to be 14,000 of two inch elm lumber furnished at $27 per thousand feet. Payment to be made in Township orders.
Arkansas City Traveler, December 6, 1876.
It cost $1,096 to run Creswell Township last year, and over $500 of that was expended on the Arkansas River bridge, leaving only $400 to pay for the draining east of Dr. Hughes’, the saving of the Walnut River bridge timbers, and current expenses of the township.
Arkansas City Traveler, December 6, 1876.
SATURDAY, DECEMBER 23RD, is the day set to determine whether this township will give $2,000 for replacing the bridge across the Walnut. A meeting should be called, and the project talked over.
Excerpt...
[COWLEY COUNTY, KANSAS: SCOTT ANSWERS QUERY.]
Arkansas City Traveler, December 13, 1876. Front Page.
The Arkansas is bridged at this place. Also at Oxford, El Paso, and Wichita.
Arkansas City Traveler, December 13, 1876.
SATURDAY, December 23rd, the election to determine the erection of the Walnut River bridge is to be decided upon.
Arkansas City Traveler, December 13, 1876.
The people in Bolton and the neighborhood of Slate Creek have raised a subscription to bridge Slate Creek where the Wichita road crosses. This will give Bolton a good road to Wichita, on the west side of the river.
[EDITORIAL: THE BRIDGE PROPOSITION—BRIDGE OVER WALNUT.]
Arkansas City Traveler, December 20, 1876.
Next Saturday the people of Creswell Township will be called on to determine whether the Township shall issue $2,000 in bonds to rebuild the bridge across the Walnut River, at or near Newman’s Mill. The petition presented to the Township officers shows one hundred and fifty-four voters in favor of the project, and anxious for the bridge.
There is no doubt but that the bridge is almost an actual necessity, and would not only benefit the farmers both east and west of us, but would add materially to the interests of the town, and the only question to be decided is whether the people of the Township are willing to pay for it. We have experience; the drawbacks of a toll bridge, and those who denounced the ferry. The majority seem to oppose both, more especially since responsible parties have agreed to replace it, in a substantial manner, for $2,000.
1877
Arkansas City Traveler, January 3, 1877.
BRIDGE.
We learn that Mr. Newman gave a bond agreeing to complete the Walnut River Bridge for $2,000. He expects it to cost him $2,500, but is willing to pay the additional $500 rather than not have a bridge.
Arkansas City Traveler, January 24, 1877.
The small bridge north of L. C. Norton’s is being repaired. It needs it.
[NOTICE TO BRIDGE BUILDERS: BRIDGE, NEWMAN’S MILL.]
Arkansas City Traveler, January 24, 1877.
Notice to Bridge Builders.
Sealed proposals will be received by the Board of Township Officers at the office of T. McIntire, until Thursday, March 1st, 1877, at 12 o’clock m., for the purpose of building the superstructure of a bridge, of either iron or wood, across the Walnut River, at or near Newman’s mill: the bridge consisting of two spans, one ninety-four feet and six inches; and the other forty-five feet and six inches in length. Plans and specifications, with bonds for the completion of the bridge, must accompany each and every bid. The Board reserving the privilege of rejecting any and all bids.
T. McINTIRE, Trustee, W. D. MOWRY, Clerk, WYARD E. GOOCH, Treas.
Arkansas City Traveler, January 24, 1877.
The El Paso bridge is being thoroughly repaired or straightened up, quite a force of men being now employed in the work. The trouble seems to have been the foundation of shelving soap stone or slate upon which an upper side pier rested, and which washing out, caused a sag, swinging the entire structure out of plumb. The bridge will be made as good as new. But we are down on toll bridges when they can possibly be avoided, and we believe the County ought to own that bridge too. Eagle.
Arkansas City Traveler, March 7, 1877.
THE WALNUT RIVER BRIDGE is to be built of iron and wood, and to be completed June 2, 1877.
Arkansas City Traveler, March 7, 1877.
WALNUT RIVER BRIDGE.
A contract was made last Friday by T. McIntire, Trustee; Wyard Gooch, Treasurer; and W. D. Mowry, Clerk of Creswell Township, with Mr. J. A. Bullene, agent of the Missouri Valley Bridge Co., of Leavenworth, for a wrought iron arch span of 100 feet, and a combination Queen Truss span of 50 feet, over the Walnut River at Newman’s mill, to be completed on or before the second day of June, 1877. The bridge is to be 150 feet long, built in two spans, and have one roadway twelve feet wide in the clear, to be constructed on the Arch and Queen Truss bridge plan, for which the Township Trustee, for and on behalf of Creswell township, agrees to pay $2,000 in ten years, ten percent, township bonds, and $200 in township warrants payable: one-half on February 1st, 1878, and one-half February 1st, 1879; binding themselves in the penal sum of $1,000 for the faithful performance of every article of agreement.
Arkansas City Traveler, March 14, 1877.
One of Godfrey’s horses fell from the little bridge near Newman’s mill last week. The harness was cut and the animal dropped into the creek, and it made its way out.
Arkansas City Traveler, April 3, 1877.
A PROPOSITION to include the road from town to the Arkansas River bridge, into this road district, has been suggested by Judge McIntire and meets with general favor. By that means the road tax of this district could be used to good advantage in making it a passable road. Heretofore all the road tax has not been expended.
Arkansas City Traveler, April 3, 1877.
A meeting of the board of Creswell and Bolton Townships will be held at the bridge Friday morning at ten o’clock to examine the Arkansas River bridge and decide upon repairing it.
[BRIDGE NOTICE.]
Arkansas City Traveler, April 3, 1877.
NOTICE.
Notice is hereby given that the Board of Creswell Township will issue to the Missouri Valley Bridge Co. on the 1st day of May, A. D. 1877, bonds to the amount of two thousand dollars ($2,000), for the purpose of building a bridge over the Walnut River near Newman’s mill.
Signed, T. McINTIRE, Trustee, WYARD E. GOOCH, Treasurer, W. D. MOWRY, Clerk.
Arkansas City Traveler, April 25, 1877.
THE WALNUT has been raging for several days, and the necessity of the bridge realized.
Arkansas City Traveler, May 16, 1877.
THE CONTRACT for repairing the El Paso bridge across the Arkansas River was let by the County Board of Sumner County. The lowest bid was $350. Work is to be begun immediately.
Arkansas City Traveler, May 16, 1877.
The bridge across the Walnut is to be completed by June 2nd. Work on the piers has begun and the material for the iron span is at Wichita. Mr. Bullene, of Leavenworth, has the contract.
[FLOOD: ARKANSAS RIVER, 1877.]
Arkansas City Traveler, May 23, 1877.
OVERFLOW OF THE ARKANSAS RIVER.
GREAT DESTRUCTION OF PROPERTY.
Bridges Carried Away.
Wheat and Corn Fields Overflown and Devastated.
For the past ten days heavy rains have been falling throughout this section and the streams are gradually rising. On last Friday the Arkansas was noticed as being very full, and on Saturday the rise was very rapid, bringing with it drift wood and live trees. Some of the latter being cedar, supposed to have come from the mountains. This would go to prove that the rains had extended to the mountains, or the immense body of water caused by the melting of snow.
Until Saturday night no apprehensions of the destruction of the bridge were entertained until large trees came floating down and the water began to flow around the approach. The Township Trustee then engaged a number of men with poles to push the floating logs under the bridge; but they came so thick and fast, and the night being very dark, it was deemed useless, and they abandoned the work at eleven o’clock at night.
At three o’clock Sunday morning, Wyard Gooch and others went down, and found all but four spans of the bridge gone. They then sent back for rope and tied the remaining span on the north side to a post and a tree about half as thick as a man’s body. Not long after a very large tree with heavy branches came sweeping past, and striking the span, carried it away. After being swept from the piles on which it was built, it swung around to the bank, and the force of the current caused the post to break and left it swinging on the one rope tied to the tree. This soon began to crack, and in a few seconds, the tree was pulled out by the roots and the structure went with the current. Those who were on the river bank most of the time say that large pine branches and portions of other bridge timbers could be seen every few minutes, supposed to have belonged to the El Paso and Wichita bridges.
The bottom lands on the Arkansas present a wonderful spectacle. Whole fields of wheat and corn opposite Arkansas City are completely inundated, and the country around almost under water. Nothing is left between Carder’s house and the Arkansas River except the sand hills, and the only way to reach the bank of the river is by boat.
We made an effort to cross to the ridge just opposite where Davis’ house stood, on horse back, and the horse was compelled to swim. Wm. Coombs, James Wilson, E. E. Eddy, and others, while making the attempt earlier in the day, mired their animals, and had to wade ashore. On the island we found a dog, and every few feet noticed rabbits, gophers, ground moles, or snakes that had gathered there for safety.
The current of the river is fearful, and the waves roll two feet in height.
From the overflow at this place, we should judge the city of Wichita to be flooded with water, and the country adjacent to the river in Arkansas City completely deluged. The losses from bridges alone will be considerable, to say nothing of the great destruction of grain fields.
The bridge at this place originally cost $13,000, and the damage to it cannot be replaced short of $4,000 or $5,000. An effort will be made to rebuild that portion that has been carried away at once, or to have a ferry run until it is done.
Arkansas City Traveler, May 23, 1877.
The bridges, mills, and dams on the Walnut are all right.
Arkansas City Traveler, May 23, 1877.
It is proposed to repair the bridge just damaged by the recent flooding from the Arkansas, also to erect another bridge west of town.
Arkansas City Traveler, May 23, 1877.
One man fell from the remainder of the bridge on the Bolton side last Sunday, but caught hold of one of the piles before being carried down stream.
Arkansas City Traveler, May 23, 1877.
Dr. Alexander, Al., and Henry Mowry made a longer stay in Bolton last Saturday then they expected. Will Stewart and some others also remained on this side.
Arkansas City Traveler, May 23, 1877.
We had occasion to cross the Walnut yesterday, and got in the boat from the southeast corner of the townsite, and were rowed to near the foot of the bluff at Whitney’s.
Arkansas City Traveler, May 23, 1877.
There was such a volume of water passing over the dam in the Walnut last Saturday and Sunday that it scarcely made a ripple, where it ordinarily has a fall of four feet.
Arkansas City Traveler, May 23, 1877.
Last Saturday as Thomas Callahan was rowing Jerry Tucker and three others over the Walnut, the boat capsized, and all were thrown into the river. They made their way to the shore in safety.
Arkansas City Traveler, May 23, 1877.
UNDER WATER. We learn from parties just down from Wichita that the streets of that town are flooded, and water covers the floors of many houses and half way up the counters of the stores. The bridges across the Arkansas are gone at Wichita, El Paso, and Oxford.
[STAGE DRIVER INJURED FROM WICHITA TO EL PASO.]
Arkansas City Traveler, May 30, 1877.
“Micky” Jim—the stage driver from Wichita to El Paso—was seriously hurt on Tuesday of last week in crossing the bridge over the little creek at the Dutch Ranche, some few miles this side of Wichita. He was driving his four horses and the heavy coach. The leaders getting frightened backed off the bridge, pulling the whole outfit after them. The horses were all more or less injured, and the coach smashed into flinders. “Micky” went down with the coach and horses, and sustained very serious injuries—his arm being broken and his back badly hurt. Telegram.
Arkansas City Traveler, May 30, 1877.
MR. BULLENE, of Leavenworth, contractor for the Walnut River bridge, came down last Thursday. June 2nd is the day specified that it shall be completed, but the recent high waters will detain them.
Arkansas City Traveler, May 30, 1877.
A wagon will carry parties to and from the river free of charge, until the ferry is built. They will also convey them across the river in a boat. The rope has been sent for and the boat is building, so that before many days the ferry will be running.
Arkansas City Traveler, May 30, 1877.
DROWNED. Wallace Blood, of El Dorado, was drowned last week while trying to swim the Walnut River. He had his clothes tied about his neck, and had nearly reached the opposite shore when he was taken down by a whirlpool. His body was found by dragging the river.
Arkansas City Traveler, June 6, 1877. Front Page.
UNPRECEDENTED HIGH WATER.
All Principal Streams Overflow Their Banks.
[From the Oxford Independent.]
Since the time to which the memory of man runneth, there has been no such flood in Southern Kansas as the one with which we have been visited within the past week. After a long time, with no rain to speak of in this valley, copious showers commenced falling on about the 24th of April, since which time nearly every succeeding twenty four hours have been attended with a heavy rain. For a time the people rejoiced and were glad for the timely visitation, until about the 15th of May, when it was generally conceded by the farmers that we were getting too much wet. The prairies were thoroughly soaked, the ravines and small streams well filled with water, but showers came with the same regularity and increased immensity. On Friday and Saturday nights, May 18th and 19th, the clouds apparently gathered in renewed force, the rain descended, and the floods came.
The Arkansas, Ninnescah, and Slate Creek, with all their principal tributaries, were thrown out of bank and the bottoms, to the extent of from one to three miles wide, completely covered with water, corn, and wheat fields submerged, frequently to a depth of from one to three feet, which must inevitably result in great damage to the crops and a loss to the farmers by destruction, damaging and carrying away of loose property. In many cases the farmers living on bottom farms were compelled to vacate their houses and seek a more elevated position, the water having taken possession of the first floor, which, in many instances, happened to be the only one in the house.
The bridge across the Ninnescah, the only one over that stream in the county, having been for days considered unsafe, was finally cut off from dry land by a sheet of water from one to three miles in width, and in many places too deep for fording, and on the morning of May 19th, no longer able to resist the pressure, went down the river.
The bridge over Slate Creek, south of Wellington, the only bridge over that stream, was also on the same day carried away, leaving parties on different sides of the stream most effectually cut off from communication.
The bridge over the Arkansas, at Arkansas City, was the first upon that river to give way, and it is reported to have quietly let loose from its moorings on the night of May 15, 1877, and went whirling down that raging stream. [Wrong! Either May 19 or 20, 1877.]
The bridge at El Paso fell early in the contest, and was carried away on the 17th, leaving the residents opposite no chance for escape except to the high land west of the Cow Skin, a distance of from three to five miles across the bottom, then nearly covered with water, and in places to a depth of from three to six feet, which was fortunately accomplished with no fatal results.
The bridge at Oxford was the last to yield to the force of the surging elements; was yet on Saturday night thought to be safe, but in this we were doomed to disappointment. With the bright sun on Sunday morning, the people of Oxford found themselves cut off from communication with the east, and all that was left of the Oxford bridge inaccessible by the space of over 300 feet, over which rolled the surging turbulent, and apparently angry waters of the raging Arkansas, three span of the west end of the bridge with two massive piers of masonry having entirely disappeared during the night.
The loss of the Oxford bridge is a heavy blow upon the business of Oxford, as well as upon the owners of the bridge. It was supposed to have been the best and most substantial bridge on the river; was owned by a private corporation here; built in 1872, at a cost of $14,500, and reflected great credit upon the enterprising owners, who conceived and executed the enterprise at so early a day and under very adverse circumstances. It was noticeable on Sunday morning that none of the owners appeared more discouraged or exhibited more profound regret at the loss of their property in the bridge than was manifested by the people generally. There is no property in Oxford but could have been better spared, or the loss of which could have been so sorely felt, but such is life.
Arrangements have been made by the bridge company by which a ferry boat will be immediately constructed and operated across the river at this point until such time as the bridge can be rebuilt. We have received or sent away no mail from this point since Friday, May 18th, so we are without news from the outside world. Arrangements are completed for transporting the mail across the river for the present by skiff, but up to date no one has been able to reach the stage road on account of high water in the bottom east of the river.
We have had no authentic communication from above this point, but it is rumored, upon what authority we are unable to say, that both bridges over the Arkansas at Wichita have been swept away by the flood. It is still hoped this may prove to be a mistake, but portions of broken bridges passed this point going down the river, hence there are grave fears that the rumor may be well founded.
Parties have now gone down the river in boats looking after bridges and other property that may have stranded or been carried out upon some of the over flowed bottom lands.
[STATE ITEMS.]
Arkansas City Traveler, June 6, 1877.
The city of Newton lost one thousand dollars worth of bridges by the late flood.
Arkansas City Traveler, June 6, 1877.
Many sheep, cattle, and hogs were drowned in the vicinity of Sedgwick City, by the flood.
Arkansas City Traveler, June 6, 1877.
E. G. Topping lost three cows, and J. N. Hayes fifty lambs, near Sedgwick City, by the flood.
Arkansas City Traveler, June 6, 1877.
Henry Stansbury was drowned at the mouth of Sand Creek, south of El Paso, on Sunday last.
Arkansas City Traveler, June 6, 1877.
The dam across the Little Arkansas, at Halstead, was swept away by the late flood, and the mill damaged to the amount of $3,000.
Arkansas City Traveler, June 6, 1877.
The fine bridge over the Arkansas River at Oxford withstood the fury of the surging waters until 12 o’clock Saturday night, when it too weakened and went out.
Arkansas City Traveler, June 6, 1877.
The chief engineer of the Santa Fe road says $5,000 will cover all damages to the track of that road by the recent floods.
[FERRY AT OXFORD.]
Arkansas City Traveler, June 6, 1877.
The Commissioners, last Saturday, licensed a ferry on the Arkansas River at Oxford. Messrs. Murphy and Carroll will run it. Their application for license was hotly contested by other parties. Press.
Arkansas City Traveler, June 6, 1877.
The ferry boat at Oxford tipped up and put one man in the river last Friday.
Arkansas City Traveler, June 6, 1877.
A horse of A. C. Wells was drowned in the Walnut last Saturday while he was endeavoring to get it across.
Arkansas City Traveler, June 6, 1877.
WM. SPEERS had a new boat made and is carrying all parties with grists for his mill free of charge across the Arkansas.
Arkansas City Traveler, June 6, 1877.
PARTS OF ARKANSAS BRIDGE FOUND.
The Clerk of this township engaged a boat last week, and went down the Arkansas as far as Deer Creek, in search of the missing bridge. On the island at the mouth of the Walnut, he found one bottom cord and part of the flooring lodged in the trees. The next lot, one whole span was found on an island near Mr. Myers’ in good condition. Someone had been taking it to pieces, and some of the iron was carried away. About two miles this side of Deer Creek, another lot was found, badly broken. Fully one-half of the missing part was found, and information gained that one span and a half had lodged near the Kaw Agency. They also learned that a considerable portion of a red painted bridge was lying near the mouth of Deer Creek.
Arkansas City Traveler, June 6, 1877.
NEW TOWN.
BERRY BROTHERS are having a building erected on the south side of the Arkansas, near the bridge, and intend placing half of their large stock of groceries over there. Mr. Woodard will open a blacksmith shop, and an effort is being made to have Dr. Cormack locate on that side. If all parties go, they will make quite a little village.
Arkansas City Traveler, June 6, 1877.
THE FLOOD carried away every bridge in Sumner County.
Arkansas City Traveler, June 6, 1877.
WYARD GOOCH started down the Arkansas to Deer Creek last Friday in search of the bridge lately carried away.
Arkansas City Traveler, June 6, 1877.
ABOUT FORTY PAWNEE INDIANS passed on the west side of the Arkansas last Wednesday, on their way to the Agency. They had thirty ponies and twenty-five Sioux scalps with them. They crossed the river at Great Bend.
Arkansas City Traveler, June 6, 1877.
PARTIES who first came to this section say that large logs of drift wood were found on the bottom between the bluff on the north and this town, proving that at one time the river was fully five feet higher than it was during the late flood.
Excerpt...
Arkansas City Traveler, June 13, 1877.
From Silverdale.
SILVERDALE, June 11th, 1877.
“The floods came and the rain descended, and beat against that house; and it fell, and great was the fall thereof,” so thought Mr. Turner, last week, when his house went down the Arkansas. The old man stayed in it until one-half of the foundation had been swept away. We need not say that the house was built on the sand; it was nevertheless. The oldest inhabitant never saw the like of this “right smart” rise of water, as some of them will have it.
Arkansas City Traveler, June 13, 1877.
Arkansas River Bridge.
BRIDGE. A talk upon bridge matters was had by our merchants yesterday afternoon, but no definite line of action was decided upon. The question of repairing the break in the bridge across the Arkansas, either by means of an iron span (which would cost some $5,000) or a pontoon bridge to join on to the half of the old bridge still standing, was warmly discussed, as was the proposition to build a pontoon bridge west of town. The most feasible scheme would seem to be to repair the old bridge, using whatever of the old timbers that could be recovered.
Mr. Wyard Gooch, the township Treasurer, made a trip down the Arkansas last week to see if any portion of the lost spans could be recovered, and reports that he found at least one-third of the missing timbers that would be available for repairs.
Many of the farmers upon whose land the timbers were left by the flood have offered to return them to the bridge site free of charge if it is decided to use them.
Something should be done in this matter at once, for in some cases portions of the lumber of the wreck have been sold. In this connection we cannot help contrasting the activity of Mr. Gooch, both at the time of the break and since, with the apathy of the Trustee, whose duty it is to look after such matters, and for which he is paid.
Arkansas City Traveler, June 13, 1877.
CHRIS. BIRDZELL was capsized into the Walnut last Sunday while crossing the river in a boat to see his dulciana, and had to remain in a tree several hours before he was liberated.
Arkansas City Traveler, June 13, 1877.
THE SAW FRAME OF LIPPMANN’S MILL was lost in the river while crossing in a boat at Newman’s mill last Wednesday.
Arkansas City Traveler, June 13, 1877.
BRIDGE FOUND.
Mr. Henry Hanson, living about seven miles up the Arkansas River, informs us that a bridge 100 feet long with floor and all complete has lodged on an island near his place.
Arkansas City Traveler, June 13, 1877.
NARROW ESCAPE.
Lyman Herrick and Miss Urquehart attempted to ford Wolf Creek in the Indian Nation, about sixteen miles from this place, last Wednesday, and barely escaped with their lives. The team of horses were drowned.
Arkansas City Traveler, June 13, 1877.
AT THIS WRITING, BOTH THE ARKANSAS AND WALNUT RIVERS ARE FALLING, and the fine weather of the past few days bids fair to continue.
Arkansas City Traveler, June 13, 1877.
John Broderick Drowned.
On last Thursday, as John Broderick, of Salt City, was attempting to cross the Nenescah River on a ferry boat, with a team of mules, the boat was capsized by the mules becoming frightened and jumping, and all were thrown into the river. Mr. Broderick went under the water at the first plunge, and drowned with very little exertion. He will be remembered by many in this locality.
Arkansas City Traveler, June 13, 1877.
CAPT. NORTH had several adventures in getting away from Caldwell, during the high water last week. Leaving Caldwell he drove to the Sha-was-cos-pa where he found a ferry, and put his buggy and sample cases on it. Before the boat was half way across it tipped over, the buggy rolled off, and in a minute the whole outfit was rolling down stream. One minute the pole would be up, then the wheels, then the top, and nothing could be seen. Capt. North followed the vehicle a mile down the river to where it lodged among the willows. After considerable trouble it was taken out and repaired and started again. At Slate Creek he put the buggy on a ferry at that place, and had gone but a few feet from the shore when the boat tipped over and emptied its contents into the creek. The Captain had taken the precaution this time to take everything he had left out of the buggy. After many hours delay, the buggy was taken out, and he continued his journey. Endurance and pluck is all that carried him through.
Arkansas City Traveler, June 20, 1877.
FORDABLE. The Walnut River became fordable at Harmon’s ford, on Monday last, for the first time in six weeks.
Arkansas City Traveler, June 20, 1877.
At last the Walnut is fordable and the farmers are permitted to come to town without the exquisite pleasure of a ride on the ferry and a walk the balance of the way.
Arkansas City Traveler, June 20, 1877.
BRIDGE. Now that the Walnut is down, we presume that no time will be lost in getting the bridge up at Newman’s mill.
Arkansas City Traveler, June 20, 1877.
“FREE RIDE to the Arkansas” seems to have played out, and the sturdy yeoman is compelled to take a little extra exercise between the river and town.
Arkansas City Traveler, June 20, 1877.
FOUND. The body of John Broderick, who was drowned some weeks since by the upsetting of a ferry boat on the Nenescah River, has been recovered.
Arkansas City Traveler, June 20, 1877.
RECOVERED. The saw frame belonging to Lippmann’s mill, sunk in the Walnut River by the capsizing of the boat, was fished out yesterday. It was lying 15 feet under water and was bedded 18 inches in mud.
Arkansas City Traveler, June 20, 1877.
WORK UPON THE BRIDGE PIERS AT NEWMAN’S MILL has been resumed and will be pushed forward to completion as rapidly as possible. If everything progresses favorably, we may expect to have the bridge in position by the middle of July.
Arkansas City Traveler, June 20, 1877.
ROUGH. THEORON HOUGHTON had quite a time getting back to town from the Pawnee Agency, where he had been breaking. It took him ten days to make the trip, and he had to leave his team at that. M. T. Bonar started a little ahead of him, and reached and forded the Red Rock; but when Theoron arrived, an hour later, the waters had risen so that he could not ford. The serious part was that Bonar had no provisions with him and after sticking it out five days in sight of each other waiting for the waters to subside, Theoron returned to the agency and Bonar started west for the cattle trail. Nothing has since been heard of him. A party of men went in search of him on Monday and have not yet returned.
Arkansas City Traveler, June 20, 1877.
AGITATING. We have heard several methods discussed as to the how to replace the Arkansas bridge, during the last two days on the streets. Although nothing has yet been done, it conclusively proves that the situation is grasped and the necessity for immediate action of some kind realized.
Arkansas City Traveler, June 20, 1877.
TOO LOW. While some persons with a team and wagon were fording the Walnut on Monday night, they by some means got too low down stream, and were compelled to leave the wagon and scramble out with the horses as best they could. The wagon was recovered the next morning.
Arkansas City Traveler, June 20, 1877.
GOOD. The lumber for the ferry across the Arkansas, south of town, arrived last Monday; and as all the necessary arrangements are now made, the same will speedily be in running order.
Arkansas City Traveler, June 20, 1877.
WORK ON THE FERRY BOAT is going lively now.
Arkansas City Traveler, June 20, 1877.
GOOD FOR BOLTON.
No stronger proof for the good times in store for Bolton Township is needed than the fact that at this writing fifteen Headers and Harvesters and two Buckeye Reapers have been put across the Arkansas to harvest this season’s yield of small grain.
Arkansas City Traveler, June 20, 1877.
The bridge has gone, but Houghton & McLaughlin have a full line of groceries and a full assortment of staple dry goods in their new store, near the old bridge on the south side of the river. Farmers, you can get your Harvest Supplies without crossing the river.
[STATE ITEM .]
Arkansas City Traveler, June 27, 1877.
The body of John Broderick, who was drowned in the Ninnescah, was recovered on the 12th inst. It washed ashore about one half mile below the place where he met his terrible death. Independent.
Arkansas City Traveler, June 27, 1877.
The Oxford ferry-boat is doing a fine business crossing passengers and freight over the Arkansas River.
Arkansas City Traveler, June 27, 1877.
TEN FEET of water in the Walnut.
Arkansas City Traveler, June 27, 1877.
The committee appointed to arrange for some kind of an entertainment on the Fourth, after consulting with the friends of the different schools, have decided to join with the good people of Bolton in a general celebration. The place of meeting, in Capt. Smith’s grove, just west of the Arkansas. The facilities for crossing the river afforded by the new ferry, just west of the city, have removed all objections to going to the west side, and for this reason the committee unanimously recommend that we avail ourselves of this opportunity of meeting our friends in Bolton. By order of committee.
Arkansas City Traveler, July 4, 1877.
The citizens of Bolton are requested to meet at the Turner schoolhouse on Saturday next, 7th inst., at 3 o’clock sharp, to take some action in regard to repairing the bridge across the Arkansas. Let there be a full turn-out. T.
Arkansas City Traveler, July 4, 1877.
MANSON REXFORD started from this place last Thursday morning, and reached Kaw Agency Friday morning with a load of machinery for the Agency, weighing 1,820 pounds.
His boat was six by sixteen feet.
Arkansas City Traveler, July 4, 1877.
The city council met and granted a saloon license to Blenden and Cundiff Monday evening. Ordered $250 to be paid for the ferry boat west of town on the Arkansas, and decided that it should be a free ferry.
Arkansas City Traveler, July 4, 1877.
ORIN WILKINSON attempted to swim the Arkansas last week, with the halter strap of his pony tied around his neck. When he got about half way across, the animal turned about and towed the man to the shore he started from, nearly choking the life out of him in the performance.
Excerpt...
Arkansas City Traveler, July 11, 1877.
SILVERDALE, July 9th, 1877.
Now about that halter, Arkansas River, pony, etc., I will say this. I did try to swim the river, but did not tie the halter around my neck, simply because I did not have any halter, but I tied the picket rope I had to the pony’s neck, and started to swim the river; but the pony, like Mark Twain’s mule, wanted to wade the stream, and because I would not let him he turned around and went back again. I wish the reptiles that report such stuff about me would all get the seven year itch, and scratch, scratch, scratch forever more. J. O. WILKINSON.
Arkansas City Traveler, July 11, 1877.
FREE FERRY on the Arkansas at this place. Come and go as often as you please without it costing a cent, as long as it is daylight.
Arkansas City Traveler, July 11, 1877.
After sundown a toll will be charged on the ferry.
Arkansas City Traveler, July 11, 1877.
At the meeting of the city council Friday night, it was decided to employ C. R. Bridges to run the ferry on the Arkansas for one month, at $1 per day. The ferry will be free to everyone during that time.
Arkansas City Traveler, July 11, 1877.
The work on the bridge across the Walnut is delayed for want of lime.
Arkansas City Traveler, July 11, 1877.
A petition has been in circulation in Bolton Township asking that an election be called to vote on a proposition to issue $2,000 in bonds, payable in two years, to complete the bridge across the Arkansas. Creswell, or Arkansas City, will be called on for $3,000, making a total of $5,000 for an iron bridge.
Arkansas City Traveler, July 18, 1877.
THE CALL FOR AN ELECTION to vote bonds to rebuild the Arkansas River bridge in Bolton Township appears this week.
Arkansas City Traveler, July 18, 1877.
The bridge bond question is now being generally talked over in Bolton Township. The proposition will meet with some opposition, although many influential farmers will favor it.
[RECAP. ELECTION PROCLAMATION—BOLTON TOWNSHIP.]
Arkansas City Traveler, July 18, 1877.
In the matter of the petition of Frank Lorry and others, voters and resident taxpayers of said township asked for a special election to be held for the purpose of voting bonds to repair the bridge across the Arkansas River in Section One, Township Thirty-five, Range Three East, to the amount of Two Thousand Dollars. Signed by J. M. Sample, Trustee; A. J. Kimmel, Treasurer; and T. Parvin, Clerk on July 14, 1877.
Arkansas City Traveler, July 25, 1877.
A call will soon be made for an election in Wellington Township, to vote on the proposition of issuing township bonds to the amount of $600, to aid in building a bridge across Salt Creek.
Arkansas City Traveler, July 25, 1877.
The bridge pier on the Walnut washed out last week. It will be rebuilt by Mr. Newman.
Arkansas City Traveler, July 25, 1877.
AD: GENERAL STORE. FRANK WALDO.
Having bought Houghton & McLaughlin’s store south of the old bridge, will keep on hand a general stock of STAPLE DRY GOODS! BOOTS, SHOES AND GROCERIES, Which he will sell at the lowest possible price for cash. Call and see me.
FRANK WALDO.
Arkansas City Traveler, July 25, 1877.
During the high water last Wednesday, the west pier of the Walnut River bridge was washed away.
Arkansas City Traveler, July 25, 1877.
On and after August 1st toll will be charged on the ferry for crossing the Arkansas River near Arkansas City as follows, from sun rise to sun set: 1 single or double team round trip, 10 cents; 1 passenger on foot or horse back round trip, 5 cents; each additional span of horses or yoke of cattle round trip, 10 cents; after sun set 25 cents per trip will be charged.
Arkansas City Traveler, July 25, 1877.
WM. GRAY received a severe blow just below the eye from the lever of the wheel of the ferry boat last week, while he was helping to tighten the ropes.
Arkansas City Traveler, July 25, 1877.
RAINED TOADS.
A freighter camped near El Paso on Monday night, July 18th, heard what he supposed to be heavy drops of rain or hail falling, but to his surprise found them to be live toads, falling thick and fast upon the ground, in the bed of his wagon, in his camp fire, and everywhere. They fell with a heavy spat, but soon were on their feet jumping around as though nothing had happened.
Arkansas City Traveler, July 25, 1877.
MR. BULLENE, representing the Missouri Valley Bridge Company of Leavenworth, was at this place last week, and wanted part payment on the Walnut River bridge. The township officers refused to deliver any part of the bonds until the bridge was completed according to contract. Mr. Bullene has been delayed from building the bridge on account of the piers not being ready and has sustained some loss, but the bonds will not be transferred until the bridge is completed.
Excerpt...
Arkansas City Traveler, July 25, 1877.
SALT CITY, July 17, 1877.
The proposition to vote bonds to repair the old bridge across the Arkansas River at Arkansas City does not meet with much favor from the residents of West Bolton. Bonds for a new bridge west of the city would be more acceptable. ANTI BONDS.
Excerpt...
[COMMUNICATION FROM “J. O. W.”—SILVERDALE.]
Arkansas City Traveler, August 1, 1877. Front Page.
The Grouse has been past fording for two or three days, which reminds me that it ought to be bridged before another year. No matter how urgent a man’s business is, he must wait until the water goes down before he can cross his team, and this too, after a settlement of nearly eight years. I have never heard a word about bridging the Grouse since I came to this country. It is time we commenced to talk about it at least, perhaps after a year or so we can do something towards building a bridge. J. O. W.
Arkansas City Traveler, August 1, 1877.
A PETITION is being circulated among our citizens to raise the sum of $3,000 towards rebuilding the bridge across the Arkansas River. This is on condition that Bolton Township votes $2,000 next month, for the same purpose. Creswell Township is not able to vote any aid, and the City is not allowed, by law, to give anything, for any purpose, outside of the corporation, so that if the money is raised, it must come from the people here, who are subscribing very liberally.
It is to be hoped everyone will give something to make up the amount, and that Bolton will do her share. We hope to hear soon of the success of the movement, that a bridge may go up within the next 60 or 90 days.
There are about 200-1/4 sections of land in Bolton Township, counting fractions. The amount of bridge bonds asked for is $2,000. $2,000 at 10 percent interest for two years would be $400, making in all $2,400 to be paid in two years. A tax of $12 on each quarter section would be $2,400, and this is higher than the facts will warrant for, the interest would only run 18 months instead of two years. I. H. B.
Arkansas City Traveler, August 8, 1877.
THE BRIDGES.
Work on the pier of the Walnut River bridge has been going steadily on for the past week. Mr. Buzzi has the contract and is doing good work. Stones two feet wide by four feet long and one foot thick are frequently put in the pier. The abutment on the east bank is also being rebuilt, and both piers being rip-rapped and built four feet higher. Mr. Gooch is overseeing the work during Mr. Newman’s absence.
In the matter of the Arkansas River bridge, an election has been called by the officers of Bolton Township to vote on the proposition to issue $2,600 payable in two years, for its immediate construction, and a petition circulated in this place which shows several hundred dollars subscribed. Creswell Township cannot, by law, vote the aid required of it for its proportion (two thirds) of the construction of the bridge, owing to previous indebtedness, but many of the citizens have assured the people of Bolton that the balance needed ($3,000) would be raised. The whole amount of each township would then erect an iron span reaching to the three wooden spans on the south side of the river. If the bonds are defeated on the 18th day of August in Bolton Township, the matter will then have to rest for the present. A ferry is used for crossing this river west of town, charging a toll of five cents each for footmen or horsemen, and ten cents each for teams, for the round trip. After sunset twenty-five cents each trip is charged.
Arkansas City Traveler, August 8, 1877.
OFF THE FERRY.
A stranger drove on the ferry boat last week with a wagon and a woman sitting in the bottom of it. He had heard that the boat only went halfway across the river bed, and when the boat stopped in the middle of the stream a minute, he drove off. The horses went down almost out of sight, and the wagon sank until the woman’s head was all that was out of water. She sat calmly in the bottom, however, until she reached the shore. It is hardly worthwhile to add she got wet.
Arkansas City Traveler, August 15, 1877.
FERRY TICKETS are sold at I. H. Bonsall’s office. Single crossing on horseback two and one-half cents. Single crossing with wagon five cents. With four-horse team, ten cents. After sunset twenty-five cents.
Arkansas City Traveler, August 22, 1877.
Bolton Township Turns Down Bridge Repairs Cost.
The proposition to vote $2,000 to repair the bridge across the Arkansas by Bolton Township, was defeated by thirty-one votes, on last Saturday. The vote of East Bolton was 32 for the bonds and 7 against. West Bolton polled 7 for the bonds and 63 against.
There is some talk now of uniting a proposition with the railroad company to build a wagon bridge with the railroad bridge. For temporary purposes an apron or inclined platform could be attached to the remaining part of the bridge, that would save half the fording of the river and make it so that it could be crossed during high water.
[FORDING ARKANSAS RIVER HARD WORK.]
Arkansas City Traveler, August 22, 1877.
SEVERAL persons attempted to ford the Arkansas River last Sunday, while coming from the basket picnic near Gassaway’s. One team stuck in the sand, and the driver, a modest farmer living east of the Walnut, was compelled to take his clothes off in presence of a wagon full of ladies, and get into the water to help the team out. It was rather tough work for the man, but fun for the balance of the company.
Arkansas City Traveler, August 22, 1877.
The ferry boat has been moved south of town, to where the bridge formerly was, and it is much easier to get to it.
Excerpt from ad...
Arkansas City Traveler, August 22, 1877.
KELLOGG & HOYT’S AD. It is hardly necessary to call attention to the advertisement of Kellogg & Hoyt this week, as it is the first thing noticed in opening the paper. This firm has engaged in the manufacturer of medicines, and are now offering fresher, purer, and better remedies than can be purchased anywhere abroad. The sale of their own preparations has been so extensive that they now have to manufacture for themselves. Call in and see them, price them, and try a bottle.
AD HAD ILLUSTRATIONS ALONG WITH COMMENTARY...
#1 MAN WITH SMILE ON HIS FACE:
HOW ARE YOUR BRIDGE BONDS?
We represent above the “audible smile” of some of our Bolton friends over the result of the late election. A bottle of our
PLANT BITTERS,
put up expressly for us, will produce the same “broad grin,” they are so pleasant to take. Try them.
Arkansas City Traveler, August 22, 1877.
SINCE THE FERRY has been moved from the west to the south of town, many persons, especially those of East Bolton, express themselves well pleased. We crossed on it last Sunday and found that less than half the distance over sand has to be traveled. If an inclined platform was built to the remaining part of the bridge now, it would help it a great deal more.
Arkansas City Traveler, August 22, 1877.
The bell for the schoolhouse was brought in on Monday morning, just in time to ring for the defeat of the Bolton bridge proposition. It cost $120 and weighs 309 pounds. Arkansas City now has three bells.
Arkansas City Traveler, August 22, 1877.
We are indebted to James M. Sample for the returns of the bridge bond election in Bolton Township.
Excerpts...
Winfield Courier, August 23, 1877.
The convention of County Attorneys at their late meeting at Topeka have given the following answers to legal questions which were propounded to them.
“In case a bridge is to be built which is to cost more than $1,000 and the county agrees to appropriate $1,000, the delinquent road tax collected, belonging to the township in which said bridge is to be built, cannot be used by said township in completing such bridge.
“Where the cost of the bridge exceeds $1,000, but the excess is raised by private or other means, the County Commissioners can appropriate $1,000 to complete the bridge.”
Arkansas City Traveler, August 29, 1877.
A ferry boat is to be placed on the Arkansas east of Salt City. Wm. Berkey has the contract for constructing it.
Arkansas City Traveler, September 5, 1877.
While the men engaged in building the middle pier of the Walnut River bridge were hoisting stone last week, one of the guy ropes broke and let the derrick fall. As it struck the pier, the wheel caught the arm of Richard Work, a colored man generally known as “Tobe,” and cut it severely. Tobe was knocked off the pier into the river, and did not come to the surface for some time.
Arkansas City Traveler, September 12, 1877.
WM. BERKEY, the Salt City merchant, was in town last week to see his friends. He reports travel across the new ferry is increasing.
Arkansas City Traveler, September 19, 1877.
The apron of the ferry on the Arkansas broke last Saturday morning, and detained a great many who were coming to town.
Arkansas City Traveler, October 3, 1877.
The piers for the Walnut River bridge are completed. The next thing now to be built will be the approaches.
Arkansas City Traveler, October 3, 1877.
MINOR NOTES. Let us have the Walnut Bridge up before high water comes again.
Arkansas City Traveler, October 10, 1877.
The men to erect the Walnut River bridge will be here in about a week, and it will then be one before it is completed.
Arkansas City Traveler, October 10, 1877.
One of the members of the Missouri Valley Bridge Company was here last week, to see about the erection of the bridge across the Walnut. It will be made to span the river in two weeks.
Arkansas City Traveler, October 10, 1877.
SALT CITY.
The ferry is well patronized and meets the favor of everyone.
Arkansas City Traveler, October 24, 1877.
In another column will be seen the advertisement of the Salt City ferry, offering to cross parties at any time of the night or day for the small sum of twenty-five cents. The route by the way of Salt City is a good one, and generally favored by freighters going to the Indian agencies in the Territory.
AD: SALT CITY FERRY. THIS FERRY IS LOCATED ON one of the best crossing points on the Arkansas River, within one mile from Salt City, and on the most direct route to Caldwell and the Indian Agencies. Teams or horsemen taken across at any hour of the day or night. Good shelter for stock and ample accommodations for travelers at the city.
Arkansas City Traveler, November 7, 1877.
The contractors of the Walnut River bridge now want a guarantee from a number of our prominent citizens that the bonds will be issued to them before they will erect the bridge.
Arkansas City Traveler, November 14, 1877.
SOMETHING DEFINITE should be done about the Walnut and Arkansas River bridges. It has been suggested that a meeting be held in Walton’s office tomorrow afternoon, at three o’clock, to talk over the matter.
Arkansas City Traveler, November 14, 1877.
A project is on foot to place another ferry west of town. It is needed.
Arkansas City Traveler, November 28, 1877.
The eastern approach to the Walnut River bridge is nearly completed.
Arkansas City Traveler, November 28, 1877.
ANOTHER FERRY.
Arrangements have been about completed to place another ferry west of town.
Arkansas City Traveler, December 5, 1877.
The ferry for the river west of town is almost completed, and will be in running order in a few days.
Arkansas City Traveler, December 5, 1877.
A temporary bridge is being built from the ferry to the bank of the river at the crossing of the Arkansas south of town.
Arkansas City Traveler, December 5, 1877.
The Salt City ferry is in running order.
Excerpt...
[COMMUNICATION FROM “R. R.”—SALT CITY.]
Arkansas City Traveler, December 12, 1877.
The majority of the wheat that is hauled to Wichita goes by the way of the Salt City ferry, since they can cross the Arkansas River at less ferryage than the proprietors of the Belle Plaine bridge charge for crossing the Nennescah.
Arkansas City Traveler, December 26, 1877.
The new ferry west of town floats like a swan.
1878
Arkansas City Traveler, January 2, 1878.
Work began on the bridge across the Walnut last week, and it will be ready to cross on in a few days.
Arkansas City Traveler, January 2, 1878.
One span of the Walnut River bridge is up.
Arkansas City Traveler, January 2, 1878.
The bank at Harmon’s ford is very muddy and difficult to cross. Some hay or gravel would help it wonderfully.
Arkansas City Traveler, January 9, 1878.
The ferry west of town is running all right again.
Arkansas City Traveler, January 9, 1878.
BOON HARTSOCK has a good large boat capable of carrying six persons at one time, which he will launch on the Arkansas at the ferry this week.
Arkansas City Traveler, January 9, 1878.
Scott, you seem to handle truth very carelessly for a newspaper man. In some future issue correct the false impression by informing your readers that the channel of the Arkansas River at Arkansas City changes three times every hour. Stand up for the truth if navigation is lost. Tell your readers that an experiment has been made with a skiff at your town, and that it was impossible to row across the river for sand bars. Sumner County Democrat.
The experiment you made with the skiff, Crawford, was when you began on the back water a half mile from the river and had to go over two or three cornfields. No wonder you thought the channel changed.
Arkansas City Traveler, January 9, 1878.
It is time to do something to get a bridge across the Arkansas, if we are to have one.
Arkansas City Traveler, January 9, 1878.
The bridge across the Walnut at Newman’s Mill is complete, but the approach on the west side has not been made yet. The piers are about four feet higher than they originally were, and seem high enough to be out of danger, but the structure of the bridge is very light and should be well tested before accepting it.
Winfield Courier, January 17, 1878.
A GOOD MURPHY MOVEMENT. Mr. Murphy, of Oxford, has completed an excellent pontoon bridge across the Arkansas River at that place.
Arkansas City Traveler, January 23, 1878.
The Walnut raised 12 feet Saturday night, and took out about ten feet of the dam at the mill. Whole trees forty feet in length floated down the river. The approach on the west side of the bridge is made of sand, and will be carried off when the first flood comes, unless it is stoned up on both sides.
[PONTOON BRIDGE AT OXFORD.]
Arkansas City Traveler, January 23, 1878.
While other citizens of Oxford have been clamoring for bonds and demanding aid from the county, with which to replace the bridge over the Arkansas, Mr. John Murphy, with commendable energy has been quietly at work constructing a pontoon bridge; which despite the many obstacles he has encountered, is at last completed and safe and reliable communication with the kingdom of Cowley is restored. Press.
Arkansas City Traveler, January 23, 1878.
The gentlemen of Oxford have constructed a good bridge across the Arkansas river by simply placing pontoons, or flat boats, all the way across. The Independent says: “The new pontoon bridge is now in place, and proves to be a grand success. The crossing of the Arkansas at this place was never better or safer in our most prosperous days.
“The pontoons, five in number, are safely and securely anchored, and stayed by strong guy ropes, and the intervening spaces covered by portable, but broad, safe bridges, with bannisters running the entire length.”
Why can’t we do the same thing at this place?
Arkansas City Traveler, January 23, 1878.
An agent of King’s Bridge Company has been here estimating the cost of building a bridge across the Arkansas river south and west of town. They have completed the bridge across the Walnut south of Winfield.
[TRAVELER ADMITS MISTAKE RE DAM BROKEN AT NEWMAN’S MILL.]
Arkansas City Traveler, January 30, 1878.
ALL RIGHT. In a few numbers of last week’s issue we mentioned that about ten feet of the dam at Newman’s mill had broken. It looked so while the water was up, but it was a mistake. It is all right and the mill is grinding every day, making the best flour of any mill in the Southwest. The bridge across the Walnut is finished, a wide road has been made in front of the mill, and it is easy of access from every direction. Bring in your grists if you want good flour.
Arkansas City Traveler, January 30, 1878.
Newman’s Mill is grinding every day, making the best flour of any mill in the Southwest. The bridge across the Walnut is finished, a wide road has been made in front of the mill, and is easy of access from every direction. Bring in your grists if you want good flour.
Arkansas City Traveler, January 30, 1878.
Bridge Completed.
The approach to the Walnut River Bridge was completed last Friday, and teams are now crossing every day. The piers were built about four feet higher than they were, and a good bridge with iron stringers placed on them. No matter whether the river is full to the banks, the public are now assured of safe crossing.
Arkansas City Traveler, January 30, 1878.
QUITE a crowd gathered at the new bridge across the Walnut last Sunday.
Arkansas City Traveler, January 30, 1878.
The water in the Walnut has gone down again so that good fording is afforded at all the fords.
Arkansas City Traveler, January 30, 1878.
BRIDGE COMPLETED.
The approach to the Walnut River bridge was completed last Friday, and teams are now crossing every day. The piers were built about four feet higher than they were, and a good bridge with iron stringers placed on them. No matter whether the river is full to the banks, the public are now assured of safe crossing.
[ARKANSAS RIVER BRIDGE.]
Arkansas City Traveler, January 30, 1878.
Mr. Smith, representing the King Bridge Company, of Cleveland, Ohio, paid us a visit last week to make estimates on a bridge across the Arkansas River at this place. In company with Mr. T. H. McLaughlin, we went to the ferry crossing west of town, measure the river, and heard the estimate, as follows.
Distance from bank to bank, 900 feet, on a line with Central Avenue; to construct an iron bridge, same as the Topeka bridge, $100,000; to construct a wooden bridge that would last ten or twelve years on piles, twelve feet from low water, spans of sixty feet each, single roadway, two turnouts, $9,900, or $11 per foot. All agreed that it would cost from $2,500 to $3,000 more to build a bridge west of town than it would south. The distance across the river south of town was estimated to be 640 feet. The old bridge had eight spans of 80 feet each. Since then the bank has washed away thirty feet or more. To construct a combination bridge of wood and iron, to join on the remaining bridge, would cost $4,500; of Iron, $7,000. The distance to the remaining span is 425 feet. Mr. Smith said if stone could be reached at fifteen feet, he would build stone piers.
There is no doubt the bridge west of town would secure the most trade to this place, but the item of $3,000 would make a great difference to those who had to pay the bonds. In our opinion, the combination bridge—that is, a wooden bridge with iron stringers—would be the best. It would be folly to attempt to vote bonds enough for an iron bridge at present.
Arkansas City Traveler, January 30, 1878.
THERE were some doubts as to securing timber for piles for the bridge across the Arkansas in case it was decided to have one. It has been settled.
Arkansas City Traveler, January 30, 1878.
You don’t have to slide down a pole to get to town now. The west approach to the bridge is completed. There were some fine sights to be seen there while the pole climbing was going on.
[BRIDGE PROPOSITION: MO. VALLEY BRIDGE CO.]
Arkansas City Traveler, January 30, 1878.
The Bridge Proposition.
To the Township Boards of Creswell and Bolton Townships and Citizens’ Committee of Arkansas City:
GENTLEMEN: We propose to furnish all material and build and complete ready for crossing seven (7) spans of 60 feet each, of combination bridge similar to the short span just completed by our company over the Walnut, for the sum of ten ($10) dollars per lineal foot, or $4,200; $2,000 of the amount to be paid in Bolton township ten-year, ten percent bonds, with coupons payable semi-annually; balance to be paid in cash. Bridge to be built as follows:
The superstructure to be single pile bents, four piles driven in one row, capped with 10 x 10 inch oak or walnut caps; a fifth pile to be driven above the bent to protect it from drift. All to be securely braced together. Piling to be from 25 to 30 feet long, to be oak or walnut, with an average diameter of 12 inches; to be driven so as to raise the bridge from two to four feet above the old bridge, as directed by you.
SUPERSTRUCTURE
to be as stated above, same plan as short span on the Walnut, and of following dimensions: Top chords and inclined posts to be good white pine 10 x 12 in.; joists to be oak 2 x 12 inches, placed two feet from center to center; spans to be 60 feet, roadway 14 ft., floor to be 2 inch elm, laid diagonally. Needle beams 4 x 12 inches pine; posts to be 2-1/2 inch star iron (wrought); lower chords to be in 20 ply each 4 x 12 inches. All iron and chord timbers to have two coats of paint.
We will repair the old bridge now standing (that is, the balance after 420 feet of new bridge is in) so far as it can be done by using the old material, without additional charge. If new material must be used, or additional pile bents are required, the same must be paid for.
We will commence the work as soon as the funds have been provided, and complete the same within 60 days, weather and roads permitting.
The bridge we propose to build as herein described we guarantee to be strong enough to carry a uniformly distributed load of sixty tons on each span of 60 feet.
MO. VALLEY BRIDGE CO.
Per D. W. Eaves, Secretary.
Arkansas City, January 26, 1878.
[ARKANSAS TO BE BRIDGED WITHOUT DELAY.]
Arkansas City Traveler, January 30, 1878.
The Arkansas To Be Bridged Without Delay.
An agent of the Missouri Valley Bridge Co. was in our town last Saturday, settling with our Township Boards for the new Walnut bridge.
While here, he made an estimate for putting in a bridge over the Arkansas. A meeting of our leading citizens was called to consider the proposition made by the company. Mr. Eaves, the secretary of the company, submitted in writing a proposition to rebuild in first-class style the part washed out, amounting to 420 feet, and repair the old bridge, for $2,000 in township bonds and $2,200 in cash. The bridge is to be a combination bridge with iron lower chords on substantial pile foundations raised four feet higher than the present bridge. Mr. Eaves’ proposition was accepted by the unanimous voice of the meeting. A committee of citizens was appointed to act in connection with the Township Board, and instructed to make a contract for the work, on condition that the necessary funds were raised. The committee was instructed to raise by subscription the part necessary to be contributed by Creswell Township, and after securing that amount, to proceed to Bolton township, and ask of that township to vote the balance required—that is, $2,000. A large amount has been raised, and it is important our citizens should subscribe the balance without delay. The bridge is to be completed within sixty days from the time the money is raised. So hurry up.
Arkansas City Traveler, February 6, 1878.
The Walnut raised again last Friday.
Arkansas City Traveler, February 6, 1878.
A frightful accident to a party of three, who were thrown from a buggy and underneath the horses in a mud hole near the east approach of the Walnut River bridge, occurred last Sunday. The boys at the Green Front Grocery can tell you all about it.
Arkansas City Traveler, February 6, 1878.
The company of three that upset on the banks of the Walnut knocked the bottom out of a mud hole.
Arkansas City Traveler, February 6, 1878.
BRIDGE, OR NO BRIDGE, IS THE QUESTION.
The $2,000 has been subscribed on this side and the matter lies with the people that will use one the most.
Excerpt...
[COMMUNICATION FROM “C. C. H.”—EAST BOLTON.]
Arkansas City Traveler, February 13, 1878.
EAST BOLTON, Feb. 9, 1878.
Our people are all ablaze over the bridge proposition which will determine the matter of bridging the Arkansas River south of the city. May the bonds be carried and the bridge be speedily constructed, is the wish of everyone living in East Bolton. C. C. H.
Arkansas City Traveler, February 13, 1878.
J. C. TOPLIFF and STRONG PEPPER presented to the Township Board of Bolton Township last Saturday petitions signed by more than 114 voters in favor of calling an election to vote $2,000 in bonds towards the bridge across the Arkansas River. We understand that everyone was in favor of the proposition, as well as several others who did not get a chance to sign the petitions. Let every man turn out on election day and vote for the bonds, and see that his neighbors do the same, so that a contract can be drawn up and work be commenced immediately.
Arkansas City Traveler, February 13, 1878.
An election has been called in Bolton Township to vote on the proposition of issuing $2,000 in bonds to build a bridge across the Arkansas to join that portion of the old bridge that remains, since the flood of Sunday, May 20th, 1877. It is generally believed the proposition will be carried by a good majority, as it costs much more to pay ferry toll than to pay interest and principle on $2,000.
[BOLTON BRIDGE BOND ELECTION NOTICE.]
Arkansas City Traveler, February 13, 1878.
Bolton Bridge Bond Election.
WHEREAS, A petition has been presented to the Township Board of Bolton Township, signed by 114 voters, being more than three-fifths of the votes at the last general election, for the purpose of voting Two Thousand Dollars to build a combination bridge and repair the old bridge across the Arkansas River south of Arkansas City; it is therefore ordered that an election be held on the Ninth day of March, 1878, at the usual voting precincts in Bolton Township, for the purpose of voting for or against the proposition to issue Two Thousand Dollars to repair that part of the old bridge now standing, and to build a combination bridge in place of that part destroyed, across the Arkansas River south of Arkansas City. The form of the ballots shall read: “For the Bridge Bonds,” and “Against the Bridge Bonds.”
J. M. SAMPLE, Trustee.
T. S. PARVIN, Clerk.
A. J. KIMMEL, Treasurer.
Arkansas City Traveler, February 20, 1878.
The pontoon bridge at Oxford has been broken up by the late rise in the river, and crossing at that point has been suspended.
Arkansas City Traveler, February 27, 1878.
A wagon containing a lady was overthrown and precipitated in the Arkansas River, last Friday, near the ferry.
Arkansas City Traveler, February 27, 1878.
On Sunday morning about one-third of the west pier of the Walnut River Bridge was discovered to have been washed out. Mr. Newman and James Huey, the Township Trustee, immediately engaged four teams and had them work all day Sunday hauling rock to throw in above the pier to save it. It does not interfere with crossing, and will be permanently repaired when the water lowers.
Winfield Courier, February 28, 1878.
The pontoon bridge at Oxford is again in place and in good condition and Murphy is happy.
Arkansas City Traveler, March 6, 1878.
The election on the bridge bond proposition of Bolton Township takes place next Saturday.
Arkansas City Traveler, March 6, 1878.
There is considerable speculating on the Bolton bridge proposition, and some of the best posted residents of the township say the proposition will be defeated on account of the parties favoring the project failing to go to the polls. A man generally will take more trouble to vote against bonds than for them.
Excerpt...
[COMMUNICATION FROM “C. C. H.”—BOLTON TOWNSHIP.]
Arkansas City Traveler, March 13, 1878.
EAST BOLTON, March 11, 1878.
The election on the bridge bonds passed off quietly last Saturday. In the east voting precincts there were eighty votes cast, seventy-nine for and one gainst the bonds.
Arkansas City Traveler, March 13, 1878.
THE BOLTON TOWNSHIP BOARD met on the 11th inst., to canvass the vote on the bridge bonds, which was in favor of the bonds, the vote standing 118 for and 39 against. East Bolton cast 80 votes, 79 for and 1 against. West Bolton cast 77 votes, 39 for and 38 against.
[BOLTON ELECTION: REBUILDING OF ARKANSAS RIVER BRIDGE.]
Arkansas City Traveler, March 13, 1878.
The election in Bolton township last Saturday, on the proposition to vote $2,000 in bonds to rebuild the Arkansas river bridge, was carried by a majority of 81. One hundred and fifty-nine votes were polled, thus: East Bolton, 81 for, 1 against; majority, 80. West Bolton, 39 for, 38 against; majority, 1. Total majority, 81. Considerable enthusiasm was manifested, and a full vote polled. The next thing now will be a bridge to cross on whether the water is high or low, and that, too, free of charge.
Arkansas City Traveler, March 13, 1878.
HURRAY FOR THE NEW BRIDGE to span the raging Rackensack! Topliff’s happy, Parvin’s happy, Capt. Hoffmaster’s happy, Skinner is happy, and three-fourths of the residents of Bolton Township are happy over the result of the election. One hundred and eighteen to thirty-nine is a pretty good majority. No more reports of “ferry stuck,” or waiting an hour and a half on the other side.
Arkansas City Traveler, March 13, 1878.
FREIGHTERS to the Territory won’t have to ford the Arkansas now.
Arkansas City Traveler, March 13, 1878.
FREE BRIDGE across the Arkansas at this place within the next sixty days.
Arkansas City Traveler, March 27, 1878.
The contract for building the bridge across the Arkansas was signed by the Missouri Valley Bridge Company of Leavenworth, last week, and sent to this place to be signed by the Trustees of Creswell and Bolton townships. As soon as it is signed and returned, work will begin.
[NOTICE: BOLTON TOWNSHIP RE ARKANSAS RIVER BRIDGE BONDS.]
Arkansas City Traveler, March 27, 1878.
TO ALL WHOM IT MAY CONCERN.
Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to an election held in the township of Bolton, in the county of Cowley and State of Kansas, on the 9th day of March, A.D. 1878, by the electors of said township, for the purpose of voting for or against the issuance of the bonds of said township to the amount of $2,000, in denominations of $500 each, to aid in the construction of a bridge across the Arkansas River, south of Arkansas City, Kansas; said bonds to be made payable in ten years from their date and to draw interest at the rate of ten per centum per annum; said election having resulted in favor of said bonds—we, the undersigned, Township Trustee, Clerk and Treasurer of said Bolton Township, will, on the 22nd day of April, A.D. 1878, issue said bonds according to law. JAMES M. SAMPLE, Trustee.
T. S. PARVIN, Clerk.
Arkansas City Traveler, March 27, 1878.
It is stated Mr. Steiner and others will make an effort to prevent the issue of the Bolton township bridge bonds. An attorney has already been consulted, but the general opinion is that it will amount to nothing.
Excerpts...
Winfield Courier, March 28, 1878.
WEST BOLTON.
The silver bill has passed, the bridge bonds carried, and the country is saved. The wheat continues to grow all the same, and the peach trees have donned the full “bloomer” costume.
Pruden’s ferry is still a complete success, and that is where you want to cross the river.
RUDY.
Arkansas City Traveler, April 3, 1878.
The Arkansas Valley, which has become famous for fertility and beauty, is that part which lies southeast of Wichita, in Cowley, Sumner, and Sedgwick counties—not the western part, which in comparison is much less fertile. Ex.
For the last thirty miles before it enters the Indian Territory, the river runs through Cowley County alone, making sixty sections of land that border on that river—38,400 acres of land in the valley within one mile of the river. In many places the valley is from one to ten miles wide. Think of that, ye simpletons that are being carried out on the plains by the buncombe speeches of railroad officials.
Excerpt...
Arkansas City Traveler, April 3, 1878.
We have the Arkansas River on the west side and south about one mile distant, and the clear, running Walnut on the east, with their confluence about three miles from this place, where a solid body of timber covering an entire section can be seen.
Arkansas City Traveler, April 3, 1878.
When the Walnut is past fording, we are lucky to have a good bridge.
Arkansas City Traveler, April 3, 1878.
The contract for the erection of the Arkansas River bridge south of town, was signed by James Sample, trustee of Bolton Township, and James Huey of Creswell Township, last week. Just before the letter was mailed, a representative of another company came in and asked the privilege of bidding on the work, promising that they would put up a better bridge for the same money, or as good a bridge for less money. The trustees, thinking there might be an opportunity of saving the townships from one to three hundred dollars, concluded to hold the contract until the bid could be made. This will delay the matter five days, after which, the bridge is to be completed within sixty days.
Arkansas City Traveler, April 10, 1878.
The contract was let last week for the building the Arkansas River bridge to Mr. Bullene, of Leavenworth, who represents a Pittsburg company.
OUR NEW BRIDGE: BRIDGE OVER THE ARKANSAS RIVER.]
Arkansas City Traveler, April 17, 1878.
Our New Bridge.
Within six or seven weeks our people can have the pleasure of crossing the Arkansas on a good, substantial, Pratt truss bridge, built by a Pittsburg company.
The bonds were voted and money raised with a view to letting the contract to the Missouri Valley Company of Leavenworth, but the wording of the contract, which the latter company sent to the Trustees of the two townships interested, differed materially from the proposition made by their agent, and as the Pittsburg gentlemen made a more satisfactory offer, for the same money, they were awarded the contract.
The iron furnished by this company is to come from their foundry at Pittsburg, is stronger than that proposed by the Leavenworth firm, and at every joint there is thirty percent more iron than in the bar, thus adding to rather then detracting from the strength of the bridge. The joists are to be 2-1/2 x 12 inches, 20 inches from center to center, and laid lengthwise, while those of the other company were to be only 2 x 12 inches, 24 inches from center to center, and laid crosswise. These advantages, together with the unsatisfactory course pursued by the Leavenworth company, induced the Trustees to accept the offer they did.
Another fact, worthy of note, is the Leavenworth company demanded in their contract that half the money be paid when the material was on the ground, in defiance of their first proposition, while the gentlemen from Pittsburg ask for no money or bonds until the work is completed, and then take the Bolton township bonds at par.
The Trustees have acted with a promptness and decision that reflects credit upon their judgment, and their course will undoubtedly result beneficially to those interested. They have been left to act solely by themselves, the businessmen whose opinions were asked displaying a singular apathy upon a question of such importance, thus throwing the entire responsibility upon the aforementioned gentlemen. Thanks to Mr. Huey, of Creswell, and Mr. Sample, of Bolton, our people will have a number one bridge, less liable to need repairs than that over the Walnut, built by a perfectly reliable company—and in a short time, too.
Arkansas City Traveler, April 17, 1878.
The pile driver to do the work for the Arkansas River bridge is at Wichita.
Arkansas City Traveler, April 17, 1878.
The agent of the Pittsburg bridge company offered to let the parties in Creswell Township freight out their subscription to the bridge fund (so far as services of freighters will be needed), if they so desire, with the one provision that they work for the same that other parties can be hired. This will make it considerably easier on those with whom money is a scarce article.
Arkansas City Traveler, April 17, 1878.
As soon as the new bridge is completed, the businessmen of our town should see that the fact is extensively advertised throughout Sumner County and all the country west of us. Good stencil work on boards securely placed in prominent portions, stating that our merchants will make every inducement to the people to trade with us, would result in bringing back a large part of the trade we have lost during the last year. Think of it.
Arkansas City Traveler, April 24, 1878.
Mr. Hutchison brought down the pile driver from Wichita last week.
Arkansas City Traveler, April 24, 1878.
WORK has begun on the Arkansas bridge. Mr. Bullene, the contractor, is here with his men ready for work.
Arkansas City Traveler, April 24, 1878.
The men are here and at work on the Arkansas River bridge. In sixty days teams will be crossing.
Arkansas City Traveler, April 24, 1878.
Walnut about three feet above ordinary fording last week.
Excerpt...
[COMMUNICATIONS FROM CORRESPONDENTS.]
Winfield Courier, April 25, 1878. Front Page.
FROM BOLTON.
The bridge across the Arkansas was to be completed in sixty days, but over half of that time is gone and still nothing done. The people in East Bolton begin to get weary. Some think another naught better be put to the right of the 60, so as to give Creswell time to “swing into line” with the other $2,000. Perhaps so. We have a good ferry anyway, which is much safer than that old rotten bridge. NITRO-GLYCERINE.
April 11th, 1878..
Arkansas City Traveler, May 1, 1878.
In sixty days the Arkansas River bridge is to be completed. When it is done we shall announce it, and then all of the big stories of it being impassable, dangerous, etc., can be set down as malicious lies.
Arkansas City Traveler, May 8, 1878.
Work on the Arkansas River bridge is progressing steadily but slowly. About half of the piles have been driven, and work on the spans has begun.
Arkansas City Traveler, May 15, 1878.
The piling on the Arkansas River bridge is about completed, and the floor will be laid in a few more days. Everybody will be glad of it, as it is not a pleasant matter to “stick on a sand bar” about the time some other party is getting away with your hotel grub. If D. B. Hartsock was not a religious man, the language of the boatmen might be obnoxious.
Arkansas City Traveler, June 19, 1878.
The pine lumber and iron for the Arkansas River bridge will be at Wichita this week, and work will be resumed as soon as it can be got here.
Arkansas City Traveler, June 19, 1878.
The Arkansas, Salt Fork, and all the streams in the Territory are full to the banks in consequence of the recent rains, and several freighters are “water bound” in the Indian Nation.
[RAIN AND FLOOD: TWO CHILDREN AND ONE MAN DROWNED.]
Arkansas City Traveler, June 19, 1878.
Last Tuesday and Wednesday a very heavy rain fell, swelling the streams to an impassable extent, and carrying off saw logs, wood, wheat, and growing corn along their banks. The abutment of the bridge across the Walnut, south of Winfield, is said to be so badly washed that the bridge will fall, and water surrounded the approach of the bridge at Newman’s mill for more than a day. Mr. Bell, the owner of some sheep, near Park’s schoolhouse, was drowned in Badger Creek while attempting to cross, and the house of Mr. Frew, on Beaver Creek, was washed away and two children drowned, while he was making every effort to save his wife. Dr. Holland’s house was surrounded by water, and the occupants compelled to remain in it twenty-four hours before they were rescued. The Arkansas River rose four feet above the bridge pilings at this place, and carried hundreds of bushels of wheat, in the shock, down the stream. From all parts of the county we learn of its destruction to men, beasts, and the grain in the fields. In Pleasant Valley Township a horse belonging to Mr. Lucas was struck dead by lightning, and hundreds of hogs, young chickens, and ducks drowned. The damage to the county will be severely felt.
Arkansas City Traveler, July 3, 1878.
The floor of the bridge over the Walnut River is becoming exceedingly shaky, and should be attended to immediately. It will soon be unsafe for teams to cross, as many of the boards are loose or nearly worn through.
Arkansas City Traveler, July 10, 1878.
SCHIFFBAUERS have sent thirteen teams to the railroad for the bridge material. Two loads came in last Monday.
Arkansas City Traveler, July 17, 1878.
The bridge men are hard at work now, and in a week or two our people may dispense with the ferry. It seems a pity that we can’t have an entire new bridge, and do away with that old part on the Bolton side. We fear it will not be many months until that portion becomes unsafe, if it is not washed away by high water.
Winfield Courier, July 25, 1878.
J. G. Bullene of Winfield, has the supervision of putting up the bridges across the Arkansas River near Arkansas City. The contract is let to the Pillsbury Bridge Co. They have put up the second span and will complete the work in about three weeks. It is a combination bridge, wood upper chords and iron lower chords. It is raised four and a half feet higher than the old bridge.
Arkansas City Traveler, August 7, 1878.
The bridge south of town is nearly completed, and the town authorities should see to it that the approaches are fixed immediately, the new bridge being some four or five feet higher than the old one. There is no excuse for waiting until the bridge is ready for crossing before taking any steps toward building a new approach, thereby stopping all travel over it for a month longer, and the people should make it their business to have the approaches completed by the time work on the bridge is done.
Winfield Courier, August 8, 1878.
The bridge across the Arkansas River will be completed this week.
Arkansas City Traveler, August 14, 1878.
The bridge men promise that they will be ready to cross teams this week.
Arkansas City Traveler, August 14, 1878.
By this time next week you can drive across a free bridge instead of paying toll on a slow ferry boat.
Winfield Courier, August 22, 1878.
It is expected that the Arkansas River Bridge at Arkansas City will be ready to cross this week.
Winfield Courier, August 29, 1878.
The Arkansas River Bridge at Arkansas City is completed and in operation.
Arkansas City Traveler, September 4, 1878.
THE BRIDGE.
We would call the attention of the authorities to the insecure condition of the old part of the Arkansas River bridge. It is more than insecure—it is positively unsafe, if not dangerous, and should be nailed up to prevent the crossing of teams until it is repaired, or the township will have a team, wagon, or a life to pay for. A comparatively small amount expended now would make that portion safe for a year or more, while neglect may cause serious loss to the township and individuals.
Arkansas City Traveler, September 11, 1878.
As Lippmann’s log team with six yoke of oxen attached was crossing the log bridge near Newman’s Mill, yesterday, the bridge gave way, and upset the wagon in the creek, and pulled one steer in with it. The boys cut the bow of the one that was hanging by the neck, and saved the rest from being pulled in. Mr. Lippmann thinks he will sue the township for damages.
Arkansas City Traveler, September 25, 1878.
The Arkansas River bridge is completed and travel from the south is increasing.
Arkansas City Traveler, September 25, 1878.
The small bridge near Newman’s Mill has been repaired so that teams can cross with safety.
Arkansas City Traveler, October 2, 1878.
We would again call attention to the miserable condition of the old portion of the Arkansas River bridge. The floor is thoroughly rotten, and it is positively dangerous for a team to cross while it is in this condition. Charley Schiffbauer’s horse came near breaking its leg because of stepping through one of the many holes, last Sunday, in that portion of the bridge. It is a disgrace to the township at present, and should be immediately and thoroughly repaired.
Excerpt...
Winfield Courier, October 10, 1878.
VERNON TOWNSHIP, Oct. 1, 1878.
A team belonging to Anderson’s show fell off of Murphy’s pontoon bridge on the 19th ult. and one mule was drowned. A drunken driver was the immediate cause of the accident.
Arkansas City Traveler, October 16, 1878.
THAT BRIDGE.
We are glad to state that the first lot of lumber for the repair of the south end of the Arkansas bridge was delivered on Monday last—not a bit too soon, however, for it was high time something was done, or travel would have been stopped. Col. Whiteman had to lead his horses over on Sunday, he not caring to run the risk of driving over.
Arkansas City Traveler, November 27, 1878.
The Bridge.
What is to be done with the Arkansas bridge? The south end yet remains in a very deplorable condition rendering it unsafe to pass over. Unless the old part is soon replaced with a new span, the structure will prove to be of no practical use to the public.
Bolton Township has done the honorable part in erecting the bridge and has paid over the last dollar, in bonds, voted for the same, though the fact yet remains that much of the material in the bridge is not settled for, and that township complains that those who originated the scheme have acted in bad faith toward them. Now it seems to us there are honorable ways out of this dilemma that should clear the bridge of debt and make it useful to the public as well. As it stands at present ‘tis a trap to the unwary and a monument to folly and failure. Pony up gentlemen, and measure as ye would have it measured unto you.
Arkansas City Traveler, December 11, 1878.
There were many citizens from Bolton in town on Monday last, discussing railroad and bridge matters. Keep it up, gentlemen; something may come of it that we will get one or the other.
Arkansas City Traveler, December 11, 1878.
The Arkansas River bridge is considered unsafe to pass over, and a notice to that effect has been put up at the south end.
Arkansas City Traveler, December 11, 1878.
Amos Walton is thinking of going down the river on the “Cherokee” when she leaves. Better remain at home, Amos, and attend to repairing the south end of the bridge. The people elected you trustee to look after just such business.
Arkansas City Traveler, December 11, 1878.
We have received a communication from one of the solid men of Bolton, Henry Pruden, Esq., on the subject of the Bridge, and we invite the attention of the public to the same. It is full of good sense, and immediate action should be taken in that direction. If his views are carried into practice, we can soon have an entire new bridge, uniting the two townships in one common interest.
Arkansas City Traveler, December 11, 1878.
The Bridge.
ARKANSAS CITY, KAS., Dec. 9, 1878.
Editor Traveler:
DEAR SIR: There seems to be at the present time a disposition on the part of Creswell and Bolton Townships to neglect the bridge now crossing the Arkansas River at this place. As a citizen of Bolton Township, I have a few suggestions to make. If any person can suggest any other means for us to get out of the present dilemma, our citizens would be pleased to hear from them.
It is not necessary for me to furnish a statement of the amount of money that these townships have expended on this bridge, and have never received any compensation thereon, only our free crossing, which to say the least has been a dangerous undertaking of late.
The bridge at Bell Plaine, Sumner County, that crosses the Nenescah River, is leased to a private individual by the Trustee of the township, adjoining the bridge, the citizens of the township receive a free pass, while transient pay a nominal sum for crossing. The bridge at this place can be managed in the same manner. Let this subject be taken up, and then to work is the earnest wish of a citizen. H. B. PRUDEN.
Arkansas City Traveler, December 18, 1878.
THE BRIDGE.
We hope immediate action will be taken to follow up the suggestion of Henry Pruden, relative to the bridge, in his communication to the TRAVELER last week. If anyone can suggest a better or more practical way, why, speak out, and let’s hear it. By some, it is proposed to introduce a bill into the Legislature for the purpose of enabling Creswell and Bolton to issue more bonds—both townships having issued their maximum limits—to discharge township indebtedness, and finish the bridge. But such legislation is of a special character, prohibited by the Constitution of the State, and the Supreme Court has universally set it aside whenever appealed to. Again, the Legislators of Kansas, like a man engaged in business pursuits, have learned something from experience, and will be very slow to pass an Act that is notoriously void. A charter to keep a toll bridge with rates fixed by the Commissioners, can without doubt, be obtained from the County Court, and the amount of travel that crosses the bridge classed as non-residents of the two townships, will soon create a fund to pay off the debt, and build the south end complete. Suppose the townships give it a trial at least, and see if it is not an improvement on the dead fall method in vogue at present.
1879
Excerpt...
[LETTER FROM “C.” IN ARKANSAS CITY TO MILLINGTON.]
Winfield Courier, January 2, 1879.
ARKANSAS CITY, Dec. 11, 1878
FRIEND MILLINGTON: During the past year this and Bolton Township have erected good and substantial bridges across the Walnut, east of town, and across the Arkansas, south of town.
Arkansas City Traveler, February 12, 1879.
Workmen are at work patching the holes in that infernal south end of the bridge.
Arkansas City Traveler, February 26, 1879.
From Bolton Township.
BOLTON TOWNSHIP, Feb. 24th, 1879.
Editor Traveler,
SIR: I deem it my duty, as having a full knowledge of the facts, to make some statements in regard to charges made against Mr. Walton, as Trustee of Creswell, in a Winfield paper. I will say in the first place, from the time Mr. Walton took possession to the time of his departure, we made a full and complete arrangement by which I was to conduct the business of repair on the bridge, and I have made every effort in my power to procure lumber, and so far have succeeded only in getting a sufficient amount to keep the bridge safe, and I will say to the citizens of the two townships that Mr. Walton has been in no sense to blame, and I have done the best I could, and the charges made have been both false and malicious, as the cowardice of a man who makes charges against a public officer and conceals himself. The public, I think, can understand that. JAS. M. SAMPLE, Trustee of Bolton Township.
[MISCELLANEOUS ITEM RE TAXES IN COWLEY COUNTY.]
Arkansas City Traveler, March 19, 1879.
The lowest rate of tax in Cowley County is 13 mills on the dollar; the highest 45 mills; the average about 25 mills. The only localities where taxes are high, being Winfield and Arkansas City, where substantial improvements have been built, such as bridge, schoolhouses, etc. Winfield has two iron and one combination bridge across Dutch creek, as well as a good courthouse and jail, each brick structures, and a large stone school house. Arkansas City has a large combination bridge across the Arkansas River, erected at a cost of $13,000, and one across the Walnut River that cost $3,000; also a splendid brick schoolhouse which cost $10,000 and is the finest building in the county. The entire indebtedness of the county is but $31,500. According to the last assessment our taxable property amounted to $2,020,000.
Excerpts...
[EDITORIAL PAGE: THE UPPER ARKANSAS.]
Arkansas City Traveler, April 23, 1879
At Oxford there is a pontoon bridge. A roadway built to it is made of rock, brush, and prairie hay, the latter predominating, and seems to make an excellent dike, closing the river in to about 150 feet, and making a good channel along the bluff for about a half mile.
The approximate amount of water in the river at Arkansas City is 575 cubic feet per second. At this place there is a wagon-bridge about 600 in length, with the lower chord 20 feet above low-water.
Arkansas City Traveler, June 4, 1879.
NOTICE.
To the People of Bolton and Cresswell Townships:
Your officers having refused to pay for the lumber used in repairing your bridge across the Arkansas river, we have purchased lot No. 1, in section No. 1, upon which the South end of your bridge rests, and there never having been any road laid out across said lot No. 1, to your bridge, we have closed up our land at the end of the bridge, and, after next Monday, no person will be allowed to cross said land; and all persons crossing said land will be prosecuted to the full extent of the law, unless the said lumber, and all expenses, shall be fully paid us in the meantime. Respectfully, HACKNEY & McDONALD.
June 3rd, 1879.
Arkansas City Traveler, June 11, 1879.
Quaker Thoughts.
Editor Traveler:
I notice that the action that was brought against Creswell Township by the Attorney for the Chicago lumber company to recover the value of the pine lumber in the Arkansas Bridge has been abruptly dismissed.
The status of this Chicago claim seems to be of some interest to others besides Creswell Township. It appears that at the time the bridge was erected, Creswell Township was too deeply involved to vote bonds to build bridges so a subscription for this purpose was raised, and the work went on. But after awhile difficulties arose in collecting the monies subscribed, and those who had paid in, began to foresee that unless something was done to help the cause along, they would soon be left without money or bridge. What to do, in this dilemma, was the question. Finally, those who had managed to drag the township into debt, far beyond any authority of law, concluded they would hit it another slap and fix the balance of the needful upon the township! They were not long in persuading the Township trustee to look through his glasses at the subject, and although admonished at the time by the trustee of Bolton, that he was exceeding his authority, he promptly placed his official signature to a contract to bind, if possible, the township of Creswell to pay for the lumber!
Lawyers, who have no interest in the question, place the responsibility of the debt upon the trustee. Mr. Hackney, himself, stated in the hotel in this town that he would bring an action against the former trustee for the value of the lumber; but he was satisfied the defendant would shove his property into the hands of his wife and beat the plaintiff out of his judgment. Now, Mr. Editor, with these events passing before our eyes, is it justice, is it fairness, is it decency to undertake to shove this debt upon the people of Creswell? I answer No. Not so long as law can arrest it. Place the responsibility where it belongs—upon him who created it. PLAIN TALK.
Arkansas City Traveler, June 11, 1879.
Native Lumber at Parker & Canfield’s, back of Benedict’s. All bills can be filled promptly from Lippmann’s mill, by leaving orders with Parker & Canfield. Soft lumber, $2.25; hard lumber and walnut, $2.75. Township bills filled, for bridges and culverts, and orders taken in payment.
Arkansas City Traveler, June 25, 1879.
There will be a meeting of the people at Bolton, at Bland’s Schoolhouse, Saturday night, to discuss bridge matters.
Arkansas City Traveler, August 13, 1879.
NOTICE. The Arkansas river bridge is unsafe with heavily loaded wagons. Hereafter trains will be compelled to drop the trail wagons, and wagons carrying over two tons must take their own risk. A. WALTON, Trustee.
Arkansas City Traveler, August 13, 1879.
Statement of the Indebtedness of Creswell Township.
The Board is unable at present to make a complete statement further back than the commencement of Mr. A. Chamberlain’s term as Trustee, with E. D. Eddy and W. D. Mowry as Treasurer and Clerk, i.e., 1875-6. Orders issued, $1,099.73; orders outstanding Dec. 11, 1878, $171.00.
T. M. McIntire, Trustee, 1876-7: Total amount of orders issued, $2,312.88, as follows: To Walnut Valley Bridge Company for road purposes, $1,634.00; issued on general fund, $678.88. Total amount outstanding Dec. 11, 1878, $1,724.20.
James Huey, Trustee, 1877-8: Total amount of orders issued, $745.50; orders outstanding Dec. 11, 1878: $406.71.
Total amount of outstanding orders against the township, Dec. 11, 1878, $2,301.91.
BONDED INDEBTEDNESS.
1st series—Date, Nov. 26, 1872; due Nov. 26, 1882; amount, $4,500, in nine bonds of $500 each; interest 10 percent, payable annually; for bridge near Newman’s mill.
2nd series—Date, Sept. 20, 1873; due Sept. 1, 1883; amount, $7,500, in seven bonds of $1,000 each and one of $500; interest 10 percent, payable semi-annually; for purchase of Arkansas River bridge.
3rd series—Date, May 1, 1877; one bond of $500; due May 1, 1877; interest 10 percent, payable semi-annually; for Walnut River bridge.
This is a statement of the indebtedness of the township, with the exception of a few unpaid orders of this year. Next week we will attempt to show how this amount has been expended. A. WALTON, Trustee.
R. E. MAXWELL, Clerk.
Excerpt...
Winfield Courier, September 25, 1879 - Front Page.
SALT CITY, Ks., Sept. 15, 1879.
The ferry is no longer the ferry, but a real bridge. Mr. Conley has built out into the river, with different material, a substantial driveway so nearly across that the remaining way is spanned by two good boats, and the public can now drive across as easily and quickly as over the King truss bridge. RUDY.
Arkansas City Traveler, October 22, 1879.
The bridge on the road just north of George McIntire’s has been repaired and teams can now cross with safety.
Arkansas City Traveler, November 12, 1879.
At the regular October meeting of the board of Creswell township, the following bills were presented and allowed.
B. L. Brush, attorney: $25.00
A. Walton, trustee: $34.00
R. J. Maxwell, clerk: $7.00
S. B. Adams, trustee: $7.00
Leon Lippmann, lumber: $45.00
M. Anderson, bridge repair: $1.50
F. Wahlenmaier, blasting powder: $1.00
N. Banks, lumber, Arkansas river bridge: $1.50
G. McIntire, work on bridge: $10.25
G. Allen, painting bridge signs: $14.60
C. H. Searing, bridge lumber: $11.00
J. F. Loper, overseer 2nd dist.: $20.00
J. C. Akers, work on Arkansas river bridge: $2.25
Amos Conway, work on Arkansas river bridge: $22.46
C. H. Searing, repairing Walnut river bridge: $1.50
T. C. Bird, overseer, 1st dist.: $22.50
TOTAL: $218.81
Arkansas City Traveler, November 19, 1879.
Our Roads.
Now that the grain shipping is to be done from this point, the most urgent necessity of the day is to make the roads leading into the city good, so that the farmers may be able to bring loads and bring them with ease. Most especially is it necessary that the road leading south and over the Arkansas river bridge should be put in complete order, and we call upon our city council to keep the promise in this respect without delay. It is the duty of the trustees of the two townships to keep the bridge passable and safe, and we think they will do it. If we want the country to come to us, we must give them a good chance.
Arkansas City Traveler, November 26, 1879.
The bridge over the Arkansas south of town is in a very unsafe condition, and steps should be taken to repair the old fraud. The south span is absolutely rotten, and is a disgrace to this town. Yet this is the only means the people of Bolton have of reaching this side in high water. We all feel a desire for the prosperity of our town, yet no measures are taken to provide for the safety of travel on one of the principal routes leading here. In plain English, it is nothing less than asking the people of Bolton township to take their families into their wagons and drive on to a dead fall that everybody knows is liable to give way from its own weight.
Excerpts...
Arkansas City Traveler, December 3, 1879.
That Bridge.
ED. TRAVELER. I read with great satisfaction the article in last week’s TRAVELER relating to the miserable condition of the bridge across the Arkansas. I have heard considerable comment in Bolton township on this subject, and we all agree that the TRAVELER has expressed our views on this subject exactly. In reading the Democrat last Saturday I noticed a reply to the TRAVELER article by the trustee of Creswell township that looks more like an effort to vindicate his actions while he has been in office than to show that the bridge is sound and safe, which everybody knows it is not.
Now we are ready to give Walton and Sample due praise for all they have done to keep the old thing upon stilts; but the fact is, all the same, that though scores of teams have daily crossed over without damage, the south span is in a very unsafe condition, and it is the judgment of our best mechanics that it has never been safe since the high water, and is liable to fall most any time.
If the trustee will inquire, he will find that able men as represent the Santa Fe railroad company examined the south span of the bridge and reported that it was in a very unsafe condition for even unloaded wagons to pass over, and this less than sixty days ago.
Several teams have nearly been killed on the south span by the floor of the bridge springing up when the team would chance to step upon the center, because the middle stringer had rotted and fell out. No longer ago than July last, the trustee acknowledged the unsafe condition of the bridge by nailing to its timbers in large letters “condemned.”
I do not credit the report that “The trustees are opposed to repairing the bridge and want to see it go down because they have interest west of Arkansas City and want to see the principal crossing of the river on that side of the city.” It is my honest judgment that they have done what they could to keep the crazy old thing from plunging into the depths of the river. More Anon. E. Bolton Township.
Arkansas City Traveler, December 3, 1879.
ED. TRAVELER. The people of Bolton are under obligations to you for calling attention to that old rotten hulk dominated south end of the bridge. Why the trustees of Bolton and Creswell tolerate an old Bender drop like the old bridge is beyond the comprehension of ordinary mortals. The only solution must be, that they need a little coffee money, and can earn it easier by repairs than any other way. Or, are they influenced by hash money from those who haven’t any freighting to do and care nothing for the lives, limbs, or property of the citizens of Bolton and Creswell.
Continue in your good work until a new bridge is built and the masses will thank you.
A. S.
Arkansas City Traveler, December 3, 1879.
East Creswell.
EDITOR TRAVELER. I notice that the TRAVELER is striking at the unsafe condition of our public bridges and while on this subject I would speak a word about the terrible condition of the floor in the Walnut bridge. The people in East Creswell are all obliged to go to town, more or less, and those who pass over the bridge are obliged to dodge around the holes. The people over here would like to see those whose business it is to look after such matters give it close enough attention so that a man of ordinary size can pass over and not fall through. J. T.
Arkansas City Traveler, December 3, 1879.
It appears that the township trustees can’t endure to have the old bridge criticized, and last week, in the patent innards across the street, give the old fraud a health certificate.
The communications to the TRAVELER this week tend to show that those who pass over the bridge, when compelled to come to town, don’t have the confidence in it that a democrat always places in a bologna sausage, and hence the difference of opinion.
We feel an interest in the progress and prosperity of this city and whatever tends to render our highways of travel unsafe should be changed for the better. If this city is to be blessed with a large and healthy trade, every avenue leading here must be accessible to the public.
The railroad company propose to make a liberal donation towards building a new span in place of the old one; not because they are under any compulsion, but for the plain reason that it is the only wise policy for corporations that solicit freight and transportation to render the public the best means of reaching them.
We attach no blame to the trustee for trying to make the bridge passable, and no doubt he has done all that any trustee could do; but what we do say is that the railroad company’s offer should be made available and those who expect to reap great advantages from the growth of the town should see that the new span is built.
Arkansas City Traveler, December 3, 1879.
ATTENTION VOTERS. There will be a meeting at the Bland school house on Thursday evening at 6 o’clock p.m., for the purpose of considering the interest of Bolton in regard to bridge and other matters. Turn out. A CITIZEN.
Arkansas City Traveler, Wednesday, December 10, 1879.
To the Township Board of Bolton Township.
Messrs. W. B. Skinner, Frank Lorry, and all other citizens of Bolton. From many conversations with you and from the tone of the resolutions and communications published in the newspapers, I am convinced you wish to be relieved of your liabilities of future repairs, and the erection of a new portion to the south end of the bridge.
I have talked to a great many of the citizens of Arkansas City in regard to this bridge controversy, and I am confident that the city will do what is right and that she will at any time you may choose, meet your township board, and any committee you may select, and at said conference agree in regard to the bridge and the cattle drive. I feel sure by taking this course you can save many dollars in future taxes.
I know if Bolton will permit cattle to be driven at all times of the year, on and over the trail to the Arkansas river, during next summer, or so long as Mr. W. B. Strong may so desire, in that event this city will agree to, and will erect anew, that part at the south end where the old part now stands.
Now, gentlemen of Bolton, what say you? Do you wish to get rid of the old bridge? Will you consent to the cattle drive?
There is no use in so much talk and no action. I mean business, and if you mean business, come over, or if you won’t come, and wish us to meet you in Bolton, name the time and place, and let’s understand ourselves and settle definitely our present and future interests in this matter, and may there be peace on both sides of the turbulent Arkansas river for many days. M. R. LEONARD.
Arkansas City, Dec. 8th, 1879.
Arkansas City Traveler, Wednesday, December 10, 1879.
Bridge Question.
Editor Traveler:
SIR: I have written some articles lately as an official of Cresswell township, which I deemed necessary in justice to Mr. Sample and myself, and now I wish to offer a few words as a citizen of the southern part of the county, in regard to matters in controversy between a portion of the citizens of Bolton township and Arkansas City; matters which say the Winfield papers are representing as very serious indeed, but which I think will be settled without any of their assistance whatever.
I find in a recent issue of the Semi-Weekly a set of resolutions purporting to represent Bolton Township feeling, handed into the paper by Frank Lorry, with the statement that they were refused by the home papers Let us see now as to the action of the home papers. I myself asked Mr. Deweese, whose name is appended to the resolutions as chairman, about them. And he said he did not know anything about them, and he would not publish them. He did not believe it was the sentiment of Bolton.
Here is a quotation from a recent issue of the TRAVELER, the writer of which I believe to be one of the most prominent in advocating what he believes to be for the best interests of Bolton.
“If my communication is not already too long, I would like to add that a late meeting held in this township to consider the railroad question, a very small number were present, neither did the resolution express the voice of any respectable number of the township.”
Now this gentleman was at the meeting; and if his statement is true, then what shall we think of the man who rushes to Winfield to do his printing.
Now let us say a few words in regard to a square, honest, manly understanding of the differences in this controversy, and then go to work in a square, manly way to settle the questions I would suggest first, that as full a meeting of the citizens of Bolton as can be called together meet at some central point, that a full delegation of the citizens of this city meet with them, and consider every proposition which they have to make. That in the mean-time the work on the road which has been agreed on be thoroughly prosecuted, that the bridge as it stands be put in shape that there can be no possible quibble about danger in passing over it, and immediate measures be inaugurated for one or more new spans as soon as the city can command the ability to accomplish it.
Let a committee of citizens from both townships take into consideration what will be for the best interests of all knowing it is the intention of the city to do all in her power to induce and hold trade.
I am satisfied that the people of Bolton will only insist upon that which they have a right to demand, and which is their just due if they are forced to come to this side of the river with their produce. Am I right, in the language of the great, “let us have peace.” A. WALTON.
Arkansas City Traveler, Wednesday, December 10, 1879.
At a bridge meeting held at Spring Side school house, it was resolved that our trustee be requested not to expend any more money on the old part of the bridge, as said bridge is regarded as unsafe and in an unsound condition.
MATTHEW CHAMBERS, Chairman. CHARLES WEATHERHOLT, Secretary.
Arkansas City Traveler, Wednesday, December 10, 1879.
Workmen are engaged in improving the road from town to the bridge, and it will soon be made a first-class road.
Excerpt...
Arkansas City Traveler, Wednesday, December 17, 1879.
ED. TRAVELER: At a meeting of citizens of Bolton on the 12th inst., to talk bridge matters, our Township Board and ten citizens were appointed to meet the citizens of your Township and city, and hear what they propose to do about the Bridge across the Arkansas River. Said committee to meet at A. Walton’s office on Wednesday at 1 o’clock.
T. S. PARVIN, Secretary.
Arkansas City Traveler, Wednesday, December 17, 1879.
At a meeting in Bolton township last Friday night, Deacon Skinner introduced resolutions that were adopted, whitewashing the action of Frank Lorry on railroad questions, and appointing a committee of conference to consult with citizens of Cresswell township relative to the policy to be passed towards the bridge and other business as may be important to both townships.
Arkansas City Traveler, Wednesday, December 17, 1879.
The propositions to build bridges are as numerous as flies in dog-days. One on the west side, one on the east side, one on the south side, and some people are mad because there is no stream to bridge on the north side of town. Give us a rest.
Arkansas City Traveler, December 24, 1879.
The small bridge on the road between town and Searing’s mill needs repairing as it is in an unsafe condition to cross.
Arkansas City Traveler, Wednesday, December 24, 1879.
There will be a meeting at the Bland schoolhouse on Friday night, December 26th, 1879, for the purpose of discussing the questions of the bridge and cattle drive. All are expected to be present. J. M. SAMPLE, Trustee.
1880
Arkansas City Traveler, January 7, 1880.
BOLTON, Dec. 26, 1879.
Meeting of Bolton township in response to a call of the Township Trustee.
Mr. Sample, the Trustee, was called to the chair, and Mr. Guthrie, Secretary.
Object of the meeting was stated by the Chairman: to take into consideration the interest Bolton township should take in the bridge across the Arkansas river, and some other matters.
It was decided to appoint a committee of three to meet with Arkansas City and the people of Cresswell, under the following resolution of instructions.
Resolution offered by Mr. Mercer that we reserve a one sixth interest in the bridge with free passage to the people of Bolton. Amended by Mr. Deweese so that Bolton should give the bridge to Cresswell township or Arkansas City, in consideration of their giving free passage to the inhabitants of Bolton, with their goods and chattels, for all time.
Resolution adopted.
Vote taken in regard to driving cattle from the line to the city. Nine against, seven for, and sixteen not voting.
Meeting adjourned with the best of feeling. J. D., Secretary.
Arkansas City Traveler, February 4, 1880.
Will the new trustee cover the holes in the floor of the Arkansas bridge?
[ACTIVITIES OF CRESWELL TOWNSHIP IN THE YEAR 1879.]
Arkansas City Traveler, February 11, 1880. Editorial Page.
An Exhibit of the Transactions of the Board of
Creswell Township for the Year 1879.
To the Citizens of Creswell Township:
Your township officers having completed their duties for the past year, and having been relieved from further service deem it their duty to make a full and complete report of the state of your township at the time they entered upon the duties assigned them, and also the status at the expiration of their term of office.
The debt of the township at the time we entered the office was in bonds as follows:
Bonds for building Walnut River bridge, $5,000.
Bonds for building Arkansas River bridge, $7,500.
In scrip as follows:
Issue of Chamberlain: $ 171.00
Issue of T. McIntire: 1,724.00
Issue of Jas. L. Huey: 406.71
Total: $2,301.71
Having published a statement of the indebtedness of Creswell Township after our first meeting, we had reason to expect that the public would want to know in what manner the debts were contracted, and whether public officers had a right to create debts to such an amount, and involve the township for years to come.
The debts were created in the usual manner for the requirements of the township up to the election of Mr. T. McIntire. We give the following figures in regard to the amount of debt created during that administration.
$1,955 was issued for building a bridge across the Walnut River at Newman's mill, and on the approaches thereto as follows:
To the Missouri Valley Bridge Company, 4 orders, $50 each, 200; 4 orders, $125 each, $500, due in one year; 4 orders, $700, due in two years.
Same company, payable out of delinquent road tax fund, 3 orders, amount $100.
Same company, payable out of same fund, 7 orders, amount $275.
To A. A. Newman, for extra work on Walnut River pier, 7 orders, $100.
To Cap. Nipp for filling approach on the east to the Walnut River bridge, $50.
To A. A. Newman, extra work on the Walnut River bridge, $5.
To Cap. Nipp, filling approach to Walnut River bridge, $25.
In regard to the building of the Walnut River bridge, the facts are that a vote was taken for the purpose of issuing bonds to build a bridge over the Walnut River, at Newman's mill. The vote carried, but it was discovered by the parties interested that the township could not legally issue over $500 in bonds. The contract which had been previously made to build a bridge was then changed so as to pay $500 in bonds and the balance in township orders, and said change recorded in township books. The township board taking the vote on bonds as authority to them to build a bridge, certain parties agreeing to take part of the orders at par for cash of the Bridge Company.
The present board finding these transactions on the books deemed the last contract entirely illegal; that the township board had no right whatever to make such a contract, or to bind the citizens in payment of such contract, or to issue any township orders in payment of such a debt so contracted, and believing that the parties knew such a contract and payment in orders to be illegal from the fact that they made a previous legal contract in the manner prescribed by law for the purpose named.
In view of these facts the present board considered it their duty to refuse payment of this scrip until it was made a legal debt under a decision of law.
It having been confidently asserted that our action was repudiation, and morally wrong, we are perfectly willing to leave it with the citizens of the township to say whether the parties who knowingly, and because it suited their own purpose, entered into an illegal contract, or the parties who have sworn to do their duty and to pay only legal debts, are most in the wrong.
Report for the past year as follows:
Amount of scrip issued by board, A. Walton, trustee, $864.32.
Scrip paid off as follows:
Issue of A. W. Berkey, Principal $4.15; Interest $.80. Total: $4.95.
Issue of Chamberlain, Principal $170.00, Interest $35.55. Total: $205.55.
Issue of T. McIntire, Principal $404.20, Interest $38.11. Total: $442.31.
Issue of Jas. L. Huey, Principal $387.21, Interest $21.03. Total: $408.24.
Issue of Amos Walton, $864.32, all paid.
There was a portion of indebtedness, acquired under Chamberlain, not fully shown in the books and interest on bonds not figured. With these exceptions we have made a fair exhibit of the books paying every dollar of indebtedness created by ourselves and $1,060.95, made by others. By order of the board. A. WALTON, Trustee. R. J. MAXWELL, Clerk.
[FROM “OXFORD REFLEX”: A FREE BRIDGE.]
Winfield Courier, February 12, 1880.
We understand the township board are willing to appropriate all the law will allow them for the purpose of a free bridge across the Arkansas River at this point. We would be very glad to have a nice iron bridge, but that would cost $12,000 or $15,000, and that is beyond our reach.
We are satisfied a good pontoon bridge can be constructed for $500, exclusive of the cut on this bank and the approach on the other side of the river, both of which can be done by donated labor. The township should donate about $200 out of the treasury and the remaining $300 raised by subscription. This work should be attended to at once, before farmers are engaged with their teams on their farms. This kind of a bridge will probably answer our purpose for a few years, and then we hope to be able to build a more substantial structure.
OXFORD REFLEX.
Arkansas City Traveler, February 18, 1880.
Township Treasurer's Report.
Mr. Editor: My term of office as Township Treasurer having expired, I deem it my duty to make a full statement of all the business transacted by me during my term of office, which is as follows:
Cash received of W. E. Gooch, former Treasurer: $113.86
Cash and vouchers received of T. R. Bryant, County Treasurer: $1,772.65
Cash received of A. Walton on sale of house: $48.85
Total amount received: $ 1,935.36
Cash paid on scrip issued by Berkey: $4.15. Interest on same: $.80
Total amount received: $4.95
Cash paid on scrip issued by Chamberlain: $170.00. Interest on same: $35.55
Total amount received: $205.55
Cash paid on scrip issued by T. McIntire: $404.20. Interest on same: $38.11
Total amount received: $442.31
Cash paid on scrip issued by J. L. Huey: $397.21. Interest on same: $20.93
Total amount received: $418.14
Cash paid on scrip issued by A. Walton: $858.44. Interest on same: $1.90
Total amount received: $860.34
TOTAL AMOUNT PAID OUT: $1,931.29
BALANCE NOW ON HAND: $4.07
As there has been a great deal said about repudiation and my refusing to pay certain scrip issued to the Missouri Valley Bridge Company, now in answer to which I will say if my refusing to pay said scrip for the lack of funds is repudiation, then I will have to plead guilty to the charge. The record will show that there has never been any levy made for the payment of said scrip; therefore, I deemed it to be my duty to pay the debts for which the levy was made, and have paid all the debts contracted by said Board amounting to the sum of $860.34 as follows:
$230.40 for material and work done on the Arkansas River Bridge.
$154.74 for material and work done on the Walnut River Bridge.
$475.20 for the incidental expense of the Township.
$1,070.95 for scrip issued by former Trustees that remained unpaid, including $428.16 issued to the Missouri Valley Bridge Company.
All of this is cheerfully submitted for the consideration of the taxpayers of Creswell Township, Cowley County, Kansas. S. B. ADAMS, Treasurer.
Arkansas City Traveler, February 25, 1880.
Our city embarked in a new enterprise last week. Parties residing west of the river have found it very inconvenient to come around by way of the bridge when desiring to visit town. They have been relieved of this trouble by the city last Saturday putting a ferry board in the Arkansas City just west of town.
Arkansas City Traveler, April 14, 1880.
The ferry west of town at the present stage of the river has assumed more the shape of a bridge than a boat, since it spans the channel from shore to shore.
[ARTICLE FROM WICHITA EAGLE RE NAVIGABLE ARKANSAS RIVER.]
Arkansas City Traveler, May 12, 1880. Front Page.
MORE ABOUT OUR NAVIGABLE RIVER.
Nixon, not satisfied with the report and verdict of the engineer designated by the government to make a survey of the Arkansas River, or at least not satisfied that Congress and its members would approve the practicability of the scheme, in addition and accompanying the petitions forwarded by him, obtained and forwarded the affidavits of two men who had made experiments.
Mr. O. E. Kimball, of Oxford, who has lived on the bank of the river nine years, swears that in 1871 he constructed and for some time thereafter ran a ferry boat at that point. The river at this point is about 500 feet wide and the channel was ever changing and cutting out deep holes.
In 1877, for the purpose of a pontoon bridge, John Murphy constructed a jetty about half way across the river of hay, trash, and small stone. The result was in a very short time a deep channel, with even smoothly flowing current, cleaning out all the bars, and for a long distance, both above and below the jetty, deep enough for ordinary navigation.
The next affidavit is made by Amos Walton, now editor of the Arkansas City Democrat, who swears that he has had experience in running a ferry boat on the Arkansas river by steam, and has also experience in contracting the channel by the same, by the use of a brush jetty. He threw three channels into one of about 200 feet wide. The channel and jetty are still extant and as good as when examined by McKown. Walton swears that he ran a light draught steamer one trip down to the mouth of Grouse creek, one trip down to the Kaw Indian agency, and another trip to Ft. Smith and as far back as the Ft. Gibson bridge. He swears that wherever the river was confined by obstructions, he found a good clear channel and that he agrees with the report made by the U. S. engineer corps.
Now what have the incredulous to say? Wichita Eagle.
Arkansas City Traveler, May 12, 1880.
Frank Schiffbauer says it don’t make much difference whether there’s a bottom in a bridge or not if you don’t know it.
Arkansas City Traveler, June 2, 1880.
The south end of the Arkansas River bridge has been repaired and is now in good shape. It is in better condition than it has been for six months. That speaks well for our democratic
assessor. Democrat.
Yes, and now we come to remember the Arkansas bridge was washed away about four years ago, when the same democratic assessor was in office. Of course that “speaks well” for the “democratic” official, doesn’t it?
Arkansas City Traveler, June 9, 1880.
The City Council met last Monday night and transacted considerable business in the way of auditing and allowing accounts. The question of the west ferry was decided and W. A. Conaway hired to tend the same at a salary of $18 a month the year round. It will soon be in running order again.
Arkansas City Traveler, June 23, 1880.
The condition of the Arkansas River bridge is so bad that travel will ere long have to be stopped if something in the way of repairing it is not done. On Monday last William Christy had a horse break through, and the same day one of Abner Christy’s mules broke the floor and would have fallen completely through had it not been for the pulling done by the other mule. No particular damage was done, but by the time that a good team has to be paid for by the township, the necessity for action will forcibly appear. We presume this also “speaks well for our Democratic assessor,” as our contemporary of the Democrat would say.
Arkansas City Traveler, June 30, 1880.
Salt City will celebrate on Saturday, at J. McLay’s grove near the ferry on the west side of the Arkansas River.
Arkansas City Traveler, July 28, 1880.
With no disposition to find fault, we would quietly and respectfully inform the proper authorities that there is an ugly place in the Arkansas River bridge, caused by a missing plank. Will some “worthy assessor”—Democratic or otherwise—please see to this matter as soon as possible?
Arkansas City Traveler, July 28, 1880.
The west ferry and its approaches are slowly but surely being put in good condition, thanks to our enterprising mayor. The people immediately west of the river, who are so anxious for a good ferry at this point, would show a little better taste if they only would turn out and help make a good road.
Arkansas City Traveler, August 4, 1880.
W. A. Conaway, the ferryman west of town, had the misfortune to get in the way of what is known as a spreading viper last Thursday, which left the print of its fangs in his foot. A liberal application of standard remedies reduced the swelling, and the injured man is now enabled to attend to business.
Arkansas City Traveler, August 11, 1880.
The Arkansas has been “on a bender” for some days past, rendering the fords useless and making ferrying somewhat bothersome.
Arkansas City Traveler, November 24, 1880.
The Arkansas River bridge is reported to be on the move towards the Bolton shore. Mr. Parvin is our authority and states that by actual measurement the whole fabric has already receded some eight inches from the northern bank. This is a serious matter, but the movement is no doubt caused by the insecure support which is afforded to the newer portion of the bridge by the older, and in order to arrest the motion it is only necessary to strengthen the supports at the south end. The attention of the trustee is called to this matter, in which a little prompt action may be the means of averting a catastrophe in the future.
1881
Winfield Courier, January 6, 1881.
Our Oxford neighbors are agitating the matter of another free bridge. Don’t think township bonds would win again.
[MONITOR ITEMS.]
Winfield Courier, January 20, 1881.
Mulvane wants a bridge across the Arkansas bad, and threatens that unless Sumner gives them a thousand dollars for such purpose, to secede and attach themselves to Sedgwick. Go slow, gentlemen; secession is decidedly unprofitable in this great and glorious Yankee nation.
The Arkansas river is a navigable stream, or so reported, and a party of United States employees are now clearing it of snags and obstructions as far north as Wichita, and the Oxford people are trembling for their pontoon bridge and the water power mill of Bates & Thompson. The latter enterprise alone is worth more than all the navigation of that stream will be in the whole state of Kansas.
The Arkansas City Traveler of this week has a long and interesting article on the canal scheme of uniting the Arkansas and Walnut rivers. It is estimated that the cost will be forty thousand dollars. We think the scheme an excellent one; but with their present taxes, it is too big an additional burden for Arkansas City to attempt to carry.
Winfield Courier, January 20, 1881.
The pontoon bridge at Oxford is now free, which will be of great benefit to that town.
Winfield Courier, January 27, 1881.
Oxford has bought the pontoon bridge at that place and made it a free bridge.
Arkansas City Traveler, January 26, 1881.
A petition was being circulated yesterday, the object being the refunding of a part of the bonded indebtedness of this township—the bonds issued for the first Arkansas river bridge, which will expire in 1882.
Arkansas City Traveler, January 26, 1881. Editorial.
The communication from “Bolton” shows the sentiment in our sister township. Our friend’s reference to the bridge, and the prospect of high water next summer, is timely and full of wisdom. There is little room to doubt that the present severe winter in the mountains will keep the Arkansas River bank full all summer, and the June freshet will severely try the staying qualities of the south end of the Arkansas bridge. This is a prophecy almost, certain of fulfillment, and in case a proposition from the railroad company is submitted to us, it looks fair and right that “Bolton’s” plan should be adopted. It will be difficult to get Bolton township’s funds without it.
Arkansas City Traveler, January 26, 1881.
THE NEW RAILROAD.
Editors Traveler: The proposed route for this new railroad is certainly a good one, and may be of great benefit to us. Besides giving us a direct line to St. Louis, it will give us another western market. But there is something more. They want $75,000 in township bonds from the southern tier of townships in this county—$15,000 from Bolton, $30,000 from Creswell, and $30,000 from the townships further east. Everybody in this section of country, but more especially in Creswell and Bolton townships, is interested in having a good bridge across the Arkansas river. Should we have high waters this spring, we may wake up some fine morning to a knowledge of the fact that we are minus a bridge. Now, we are already heavily in debt, and if we add to this the bonds this railroad asks, and our bridge should happen to leave us, what will we do? What can we do? Either do without a bridge, or go down into our pockets hunting for the money to build another one.
Now for a suggestion. Let the Boards of the two townships come together and make a proposition to Jay Gould’s agents to this effect. If we vote the bonds to this company, they must bind themselves to build us, in connection with the railroad bridge across the Arkansas, a good wagon bridge, which shall be free. It will cost them perhaps $3,000 extra, but that is very little out of the $45,000 wanted from us. If it would cost $5,000, it would still be but one-ninth of the bonds wanted. This, in addition to the benefits we may derive from the railroad, will give us a good substantial crossing for our own accommodation. BOLTON.
Winfield Courier, February 3, 1881.
The farmers near Mulvane are crossing the Arkansas river on the ice and thereby saving the expense of building a bridge.
Winfield Courier, February 10, 1881.
The Arkansas river is reported to be “on a boom,” and it is said that the pontoon bridge at Oxford is washed away.
Arkansas City Traveler, February 16, 1881.
The pontoon bridge across the Arkansas River at Oxford is a thing of the past, having been washed away.
Winfield Courier, February 17, 1881.
The dam at the Oxford flouring mill and the pontoon bridge have gone down stream.
Winfield Courier, February 17, 1881.
The Arkansas River boom proved a disastrous affair for our neighbors. At Sterling it struck the bridge and carried away several spans. At Nickerson it played havoc with the bridge, and what is more serious, destroyed a human life. A man was just driving across when the great mass of ice and water caught the middle span and carried it away, engulfing him and his team in the frightful vortex below. The man finally struggled out upon a large cake of ice, and was making a successful effort to get disentangled, when the cake struck a small island and threw him over into a watery grave. His name has not yet been learned nor the body recovered. The team was drowned.
Excerpts...
[OXFORD WEEKLY ITEMS.]
Winfield Courier, March 3, 1881.
It is probable that the Oxford ferry will be in operation by next Tuesday, and the bridge will be repaired as soon as possible.
Two men from Winfield, whose names we did not learn, in attempting to cross the river on the ice with a team and buggy, last Monday, broke through and had quite a lively time for awhile, but succeeded in getting across without anything serious happening.
Arkansas City Traveler, March 9, 1881.
F. M. Vaughn recently took a load of corn from this city to Pawnee Agency; and in crossing the Salt Fork on the ferry boat, the load proved too heavy for the boat, causing it to sink. Luckily they had passed the deeper channel, and hitching his mules to the boat, Mr. Vaughn pulled boat, wagon, corn, and men safely to shore. F. M. Vaughn says ferry boats are handy things to have.
Excerpts...
Arkansas City Traveler, March 16, 1881.
FROM SALT CITY.
SALT CITY, March 14, 1881.
The ferry is in good running order. People are crossing every day on their way to Arkansas City to obtain work on that canal. It makes a bonanza for the ferryman, as his charges are reasonable, and by this route some four or five miles of travel are saved, economizing both time and horse flesh.
While at your county seat recently, I learned that some of her citizens felt sick over the canal business at Arkansas City. Several talk of moving to your city to take advantage of the general prosperity prevailing therein. While your enterprising citizens are doing the heavy manufacturing, we will furnish you with the best salt made.
Arkansas City Traveler, April 6, 1881.
SEALED BIDS.
Bids for building a bridge across the creek, near B. Goff’s, on the county road, will be received by the township clerk until April 30, 1881. Bidders are requested to furnish plans and specifications. The board reserves the right to reject any and all bids. For further information, inquire of, or address, B. Goff. URIAH SPRAY, Trustee.
W. D. MOWRY, Clerk.
[STATE/LOCAL NEWS.]
Winfield Courier, April 14, 1881.
The Oxford pontoon bridge has been built anew in much more substantial form and is now ready for business.
Arkansas City Traveler, May 4, 1881.
The bridges on the Arkansas river, above Wichita, are all reported more or less damaged by freshets, some of them seriously. The Sterling bridge is almost totally destroyed.
Arkansas City Traveler, May 4, 1881.
We understand that Mr. J. T. Grimes has taken the contract of putting in the bridges across the canal. If such is the case, we may look for some good substantial work, for Mr. Grimes is a No. 1 mechanic and a thorough master of his business in all its varied branches.
Arkansas City Traveler, May 18, 1881.
The bids for the erection of a bridge over the Arkansas River, at Mulvane, were opened last Thursday.
Arkansas City Traveler, May 25, 1881.
The contract for the construction of the bridge across the Arkansas River at Mulvane, has been let to Hobson, Reese & Sawyer, of Wichita, their bids being the lowest, viz. $3,300, of which sum $2,000 will be paid by the county, $500 by Gore Township, and $800 by the citizens of Mulvane. Wellingtonian.
[ARKANSAS RIVER BRIDGE.]
Arkansas City Traveler, June 8, 1881.
THE BRIDGE.
The time has now come when it is imperative that immediate steps be taken for the repairing and putting in a passable condition, the bridge across the Arkansas river. We have several times called attention to the insecure condition of this structure, the south end more especially, but the parties whose duty it is to attend to such matters have so far taken no action, and, consequently, today anyone crossing the river on this bridge does so at the risk of life and limb.
We cannot understand the reasons for delay in a matter of so vital importance to the citizens of both Cresswell and Bolton townships. It surely cannot be from economical motives, for no man, or set of men, of any sense, would jeopardize so important a factor in the prosperity of the two townships merely to save the expending of two or three hundred dollars.
Whatever the reasons are, we think it is decidedly a culpable and short sighted policy, as well as one which may return upon the township, in the way of a suit for damages, in the event of an accident happening, to say nothing of the loss and inconvenience, if the bridge should be washed out for want of seasonable attention. This matter, we presume, comes under the jurisdiction of the township trustees, and to these gentlemen we would suggest that immediate action in this direction would redound greatly to their credit, as well as to the welfare of the citizens of both townships.
One thing is certain, the bridge must be repaired or closed, and that, too, in the near future. Which of these alternatives it would be policy to accept, we deem it needless to point out.
Excerpt...
[WELLINGTON PRESS ITEMS.]
Winfield Courier, June 16, 1881.
The pontoon bridge across the Arkansas river at Oxford is now completed and in full operation. One difficulty after another has arisen to thwart the project and it has required nothing short of the pluck and energy of J. M. Buffington to carry it through to a successful termination. “Buff” knows no such word as “fail” and does whatever he takes in hand. Consequently, Oxford has a bridge that is substantial and will stand any flood that may come.
Arkansas City Traveler, June 29, 1881.
We learn from our trustee, Mr. Spray, that considerable work has been done on the Arkansas River bridge south of town, within the past few days, and he now informs us that he considers the bridge safe for the present. It would necessitate a larger outlay of capital than it is in the power of the trustee to expend to make the repairs necessary to permanently fix the structure. The funds for this purpose must be provided in some other way, either by a direct tax or voting bonds for the purpose. The trustees of both Cresswell and Bolton townships have done, and will continue to do, all in their power in this matter, but it is folly to expect impossibilities, even from a township trustee.
An Indiana editor was once asked why he didn’t visit the summer resorts. The pithy answer was given. “It can’t be did on four dollars and a half.” We fancy this is about the present position of the trustees in respect to this bridge.
Arkansas City Traveler, August 3, 1881.
ARKANSAS RIVER BRIDGE.
At the request of Mr. Spray we publish the following letter, written by Mr. O’Grady, in response to a request by Mr. Spray, for an estimate as to the probable cost of putting said bridge structure in a state of permanent repair. This question is one that will force itself upon the consideration of our people, ere long, and must be met by prompt attention, or otherwise the money already invested in this bridge will be virtually thrown away. We need say no more at present, as the letter will explain itself.
ARKANSAS CITY, July 30th.
URIAH SPRAY, Esq., Trustee, Creswell Township., Cowley Co., Kansas.
DEAR SIR: As you requested, I made a survey of the portion of the highway bridge over the Arkansas River, extending south from the south end of the new bridge to the north end of the road approach, a distance of 252 feet, with a view of submitting an embankment for the old bridge that is there now, and find the following results:
Earthwork, 4,969 Cubic Yards, @ 26 cents: $1,291.94
This would give you an embankment for road 16 feet wide on top [which would allow two teams to pass], slopes 1-1/2 to 1, and a gradient of one and fifteen hundredths per 100 feet, which is a good one, being only sixty and seventy-two hundredths per mile.
Should you prefer extending the new part of the bridge further south for one span, it would make a difference of 1,500 cubic yards, and the comparative estimates would stand as under: Embankment from end of new bridge to approach, 4,969 Cubic Yards, @ 26 cents: $1,291.24
One new span of bridge 60 ft. lineal @ $25: 1,500.00
3,469 Cubic Yards of earthwork @ 26 cents: 901.94
TOTAL: $2,401.94
Respectfully, J. D. C. O’GRADY, Civil Engineer.
P. S.: If an embankment was determined on all the way, some stone rip-rap should be built for a short distance, but I could not say how much that would be without investigating further. J. D. C. O’G.
Arkansas City Traveler, October 19, 1881.
Since the late storm it is impossible for loaded wagons to cross Fall Creek, and Bluff Creek is in little better condition. Freighters are camped on either side, waiting, unable to cross until something is done. Bridges are badly needed, and if not built, the large Territory trade, now enjoyed by Caldwell, will go eastward.
The above is taken from the Wellington Press, and we can well imagine the condition of the two streams mentioned, the steep bluffy banks of which are barely passable at any time, and after a rain—well—good Lord deliver us. It would be well for freighters and others to remember the inducements, in the way of good roads and bridges, which Arkansas City affords, and which would save them both time and money by using.
Arkansas City Traveler, October 26, 1881.
While the Walnut was high last week, the water backed over the little bridge north of Searing’s mill, and compelled travelers to go up the bluff.
Excerpt...
[REPORT FROM “W. H.”—NORTHWEST CRESWELL.]
Winfield Courier, November 24, 1881.
A man while crossing at the Salt City Ferry the other day was shooting at some ducks up the river and shot one of the strands out of the long rope that is stretched across the river. This may cost Will Mc. a new rope.
1882
Arkansas City Traveler, January 18, 1882.
To Bolton Tax Payers.
Notice is hereby given that a meeting of the Township Board, of Bolton Township, will be held at the Bland Schoolhouse, on Saturday, January 28th, 1882, for the purpose of auditing the accounts and ascertaining the financial condition of the township. The matter of the Arkansas River Bridge will come before the meeting, and it is hoped that all interested will attend. By order, WM. TRIMBLE, Trustee.
Excerpts...not sure if the following applies to Winfield or Arkansas City!
Cowley County Courant, April 13, 1882.
The Board of County Commissioners met in regular session Monday morning, and have been busy transacting the usual routine of business. All three members of the Board were in attendance.
The petition of D. S. Roach for a ferry on the Arkansas river was granted, and the County Clerk directed to issue license for one year.
Arkansas City Traveler, May 31, 1882.
Election Notice.
To the qualified voters of Creswell Township, Cowley County, Kansas.
NOTICE is hereby given in pursuance of a petition heretofore duly presented to the Township Board of said township, that on the 24th day of June, A. D., 1882, between the hours of 8 o’clock A. M. and 6 o’clock P. M., of said day at the usual place of holding elections in, and for said Creswell Township, Cowley County, Kansas, a special election of the qualified voters of the said township will be held for the purpose of voting upon a proposition to issue the bonds of said Creswell Township, in the amount of two thousand dollars ($2,000) payable with the interest thereon at the Fiscal Agency of the State of Kansas, in the city of New York City, New York. Said bonds to bear interest at the rate of seven percentum per annum, payable semi-annually and said bonds to be payable in not less than five nor more than thirty years, and said bonds to be issued and used for the purpose of building a bridge across the Arkansas River in said Creswell Township, at the following point, to-wit: From the south end of the new portion of the bridge commonly known as the Arkansas River bridge, now extending partly across said Arkansas River, about three-eights of one mile west from the range line, between ranges three and four east, in Cowley County, Kansas, to the south and right bank of said river. Said special election to be conducted according to the general election laws of this State, and those voting in favor of building the bridge as aforesaid shall have written or printed on their ballots “For the bridge and bonds,” and those opposed, “Against the bridge and bonds.” By order of township Board, Arkansas City, Kansas. Uriah Spray, Trustee. Wm. Sleeth, Treasurer, W. C. Mowry, Clerk.
May 30th, 1882.
Arkansas City Traveler, May 31, 1882.
During the rain of last Thursday the small bridge south of the Arkansas River was washed so that it is unsafe to cross with teams.
Excerpts...
Arkansas City Traveler, June 14, 1882. Editorial.
GEUDA’S BOOM.
On Wednesday of last week, in company with J. W. Scott, of Cadiz, Ohio, and his son, C. M. Scott, we made a flying visit to this new and prosperous burg, which is fast becoming one of the most popular health resorts of the West. Driving along on the east side of the Arkansas River, through a magnificent farming country, now adorned with waving fields of golden grain, in some instances already bending before the harvester, we could not help but feel how glorious a country this was of ours. About four miles up the river, from Arkansas City, as Geuda looms into view, one can hardly realize that a few short months ago the present thriving town did not exist; not even on paper. Crossing the river on the ferry, run by W. V. McCormick, we climbed the river bank and came in full view of the town of Geuda, glistening in the sunshine of a bright June day, about one mile distant.
Wishing to see as much country as possible, determined our part to drive home through Bolton Township instead of returning by the ferry, and the panorama of agricultural beauty that greeted our eyes on every side must be seen to be appreciated.
Arkansas City Traveler, June 28, 1882.
The bond election, held in this city last Saturday, for issuing bonds to repair the Arkansas river bridge, carried by a majority of two-thirds of the vote polled.
Arkansas City Traveler, July 12, 1882.
There are five bridge petitions now before the County Commissioners of Sumner County. One of them asks for an appropriation for the Mulvane bridge and the other four ask for new bridges. It is probable that before adjourning the Commissioners will submit a proposition to a vote of the people to construct a system of bridges and to build a courthouse. Such a course would meet with universal favor. S. C. Press.
Arkansas City Traveler, August 16, 1882.
Several new piles were put down at the Arkansas river bridge last week, which will make it safe until the new part is ready to be put in.
Arkansas City Traveler, August 30, 1882.
ARKANSAS RIVER BRIDGE.
The bonds for repairing the above structure, voted some time since, have been disposed of, and the contract for putting in two 70 foot spans and 60 feet of approach embankment to the bridge, has been let to the Missouri Valley Bridge Company, the same to be fully completed by Nov. 1st, 1882.
This leaves about 50 or 60 feet of the approach on the south side yet to be completed before the bridge is in thoroughly good shape, but as this part rests with the people of Bolton township, no delay will result. This is a much needed improvement, and we are glad to see it under way.
Arkansas City Traveler, October 18, 1882.
The three grist mills at this place are bringing new trade from the eastern portion of the county that we lost years ago when the Walnut bridge went out.
Arkansas City Traveler, October 18, 1882.
The Bolton residents begin to inquire why that Arkansas river bridge is not repaired according to contract. The time is up almost for when it was to be completed, and the work has not begun yet. While the river was fordable would have been the best time, but as it is now, the bridge will be closed about the time farmers will be hauling corn to pay taxes.
Arkansas City Traveler, October 25, 1882.
We understand the timbers for the Arkansas river bridge are now at the depot. The bridge cannot be put in shape too quickly.
Arkansas City Traveler, October 25, 1882.
Work commenced upon the Arkansas river bridge this morning.
Arkansas City Traveler, October 25, 1882.
Miraculous Escape.
While Mr. Clevier, of Kaw Agency, was crossing the Arkansas river bridge yesterday, his mules commenced backing from a hole in the floor of the bridge, and backed clear off, falling to the sand below, breaking the wagon almost to pieces, but otherwise doing no material hurt. His wife and child, who were in the wagon, were not hurt in the least, as the bed of the wagon turned over and entirely covered them, thus protecting them from harm.
Arkansas City Traveler, November 15, 1882.
While the men engaged in building the Arkansas river bridge were standing on the second old span from the new bridge, the structure fell with a fearful crash, precipitating the whole party into the river, where the water was about knee deep. No one was seriously injured. Mr. Milks has his back slightly sprained.
Arkansas City Traveler, November 15, 1882.
During the revolution of political affairs last Tuesday, Amos Walton was elected County Commissioner over Henry Harbaugh, one of the best commissioners the county ever had. Many a poorer man for the place might have been elected than Mr. Walton. He is a farmer and a lawyer, familiar with the needs and wants of this section, and especially the township in which he resides. We may now look for some action to have the county do something to support our $20,000 Arkansas river bridge.
[ELECTION: BONDS TO BUILD A BRIDGE ACROSS ARKANSAS RIVER.]
Arkansas City Traveler, November 15, 1882.
Election Notice.
To the qualified voters of Creswell Township, Cowley County, Kansas.
NOTICE is hereby given in pursuance of a petition hereunto duly presented to the Township Board of said township, that on the 7th day of December, A. D., 1882, between the hours of 8 o’clock a.m. and 6 o’clock p.m. of said day at the usual place of holding elections in and for said Creswell township, Cowley County, Kansas, a special election of the qualified voters of the said township will be held for the purpose of voting upon a proposition to issue the bonds of said Creswell township, in the amount of four thousand dollars ($4,000), payable with the interest thereon at the Fiscal Agency of the State of Kansas, in the city of New York City, New York. Said bonds bear interest at the rate of seven per centum per annum, payable semi-annually, and said bonds not to be payable in not less than five years nor more than thirty years, and said bonds to be issued and used for the purpose of building a bridge across the Arkansas river in said Creswell township, at the following point, to-wit: At or near the Southwest corner of section twenty-five (25) of township thirty four (34) south of Range three (3) east or as near thereto as practicable.
Said special election to be conducted according to the general election laws of this State, and those voting in favor of building of the bridge as aforesaid shall have written or printed on their ballot: “For the bridge and bonds,” and those opposed “Against the bridge and bonds.” By order of township Board, Arkansas City, Kansas.
S. J. Mantor, Trustee. Wm. Sleeth, Treasurer. W. D. Mowry, Clerk.
Nov. 12, 1882.
Arkansas City Traveler, November 22, 1882.
The bridge across the Arkansas river is almost completed, and will be ready in a few days to accommodate the public.
Arkansas City Traveler, November 22, 1882.
Remember that on Thursday, Dec. 7th, a proposition will be submitted to vote bonds to the amount of $4,000 for the purpose of building a bridge across the Arkansas river near the canal dam. The bridge is to be built by Creswell township.
Arkansas City Traveler, November 29, 1882.
Owing to an error in the election notice as heretofore published, the election for voting bonds to build a bridge across the Arkansas river west of town will not be held until Dec. 21st, 1882.
Arkansas City Traveler, December 6, 1882.
It is with pleasure we chronicle the completion of the repairs upon the Arkansas River bridge south of town, which is now open to traffic. The condition of this structure has been an eyesore for several months past, but we hope that now it is in thoroughly good shape, it will be kept so in the future.
Arkansas City Traveler, December 20, 1882.
Tomorrow’s vote will decide whether or not we have a bridge across the Arkansas river west of town.
1883
Arkansas City Traveler, January 3, 1883.
The election to vote bonds for building a bridge across the Arkansas River west of town resulted in the bonds being carried by a small majority.
Winfield Courier, February 15, 1883.
High water is worrying the railroad companies. A bridge near Harper is gone and the bridge across the Arkansas at Oxford is in a dangerous condition.
Arkansas City Traveler, February 21, 1883.
Our people were considerably exercised over the high waters last week, but fortunately no damage was done to the milling or bridge interests of this vicinity.
Arkansas City Traveler, February 21, 1883.
The approach to the Walnut River Bridge was swept away during the recent high water. But little inconvenience resulted, however, as the repairs were promptly made under the supervision of W. J. Canfield. The riprapping of the piers was also washed away, but the township board will see that all necessary work is promptly done. The total cost of the repairs will probably be about $300.00.
Arkansas City Traveler, February 21, 1883.
There will be a meeting of the citizens of Bolton Township at 3 o’clock on Saturday, March 3, 1883, to take into consideration a subscription for a bridge over the Arkansas River. Meeting to be held at the Theaker Schoolhouse.
Winfield Courier, February 22, 1883.
The bridge across the Ninnescah on the Santa Fe road was washed out last week and trains on the Caldwell branch are run to and from Wellington by way of this place.
Arkansas City Traveler, March 7, 1883.
An effort will be made to bridge Grouse Creek near the Coburn ford. Such a bridge would accommodate the farmers as well as our Territory friends.
Arkansas City Traveler, March 7, 1883.
A bridge should be constructed across the Walnut River at Harmon’s Ford to enable stockmen to drive to the railroad stock pens, as well as to let the farmers into the canal mills, and into town without driving half a dozen miles out of the way.
Caldwell Commercial, Thursday, March 15, 1883.
Messrs. Hays and Fouts have sold the Willow Springs Ranch to Roberts & Co. The latter firm will run the stage station at the Springs, and in addition build a bridge across the stream at that point for the accommodation of travel. Willow Springs is out of our bailiwick, being directly south of Arkansas City, still we are glad of the change because it will make travel more convenient in the eastern portion of the Strip.
Arkansas City Traveler, May 16, 1883.
The contract for building the bridge across the Arkansas River west of the city has been let and the work commenced.
Arkansas City Traveler, May 23, 1883.
We learn from the Index that the iron bridge across the Walnut, at Douglass, succumbed to the late flood.
Arkansas City Traveler, May 23, 1883.
On last Sunday morning the eastbound freight train on the K. C. L. & S. Railway was precipitated into the Arkansas River by the breaking down of the Oxford Bridge. The engineer went down with his engine to a watery grave. The fireman and brakeman swam ashore. The river was very high and we learn that a car load or two of stock were lost in the wreck.
Caldwell Journal, May 24, 1883.
Last Saturday the railroad bridge across the Arkansas at Oxford went down, taking with it the engine, tender, and one car of horses. The engineer, fireman, and road master were on the engine at the time. The last two managed to get ashore, but the engineer, Howard Finley, was drowned. Up to yesterday his body had not been recovered. We learn that the K. C. L. & S. passenger train had passed over the bridge about fifteen minutes before.
Arkansas City Traveler, June 6, 1883.
No more fording; the bridge south of town is fixed.
Arkansas City Traveler, June 6, 1883.
The bridge across the Arkansas River has been temporarily repaired.
Arkansas City Traveler, June 6, 1883.
Work on the new Arkansas River bridge west of town has commenced.
Arkansas City Traveler, June 6, 1883.
Mr. Ed. Grady, of the Arkansas City Lumberyard, has been awarded the contract for supplying about six car loads of lumber for the construction of the new bridge across the Arkansas River west of town. Three car loads are already upon the ground.
Arkansas City Traveler, June 6, 1883.
BRIDGE FALL.
As Mr. Evans, formerly of Logan County, Illinois, was crossing a herd of cattle on the Arkansas River bridge, last Thursday, the cattle crowded on and were met at the south end of the bridge by two wagons, which blocked the way, and caused the cattle to turn and run, when the south span of the new part of the bridge gave way and about 30 head of stock were precipitated into the river, killing five head and crippling others. The water was shallow and none were drowned. The township levied on the stock for damages, which was compromised by Mr. Evans paying $400. The Bolton Township farmers will be inconvenienced considerably until the bridge is repaired.
Arkansas City Traveler, June 6, 1883.
Mr. Wm. Canfield has been busily engaged upon the temporary repairs upon the Arkansas River bridge broken down by stock last week; as a result thereof, we are glad to state the bridge is once more open to traffic, which will obviate an immense amount of inconvenience to the Bolton farmers.
Winfield Courier, June 7, 1883.
A span of the Arkansas City Bridge was broken down by a herd of cattle Thursday. An attachment was got out and the owner of the cattle made to pay for the breakage. The law business was done from the county attorney’s office at this place by telephone.
Arkansas City Traveler, June 13, 1883.
The body of Finley, who went down with his engine at the Oxford Bridge accident, has not been recovered.
Arkansas City Traveler, June 13, 1883.
Mr. T. E. Moorhead, a brother of Rev. I. N. Moorhead, is in the city. The gentleman is a civil engineer and will superintend the erection of the new Arkansas River Bridge west of town.
Arkansas City Traveler, June 13, 1883.
We last week announced the Arkansas River Bridge as open for traffic. The statement was made by authority and the high waters was the only reason that prevented the bridge being completed and so we trust all those who were misled by us in this matter will at least give us credit for our good intentions.
Arkansas City Traveler, June 27, 1883.
All efforts to raise the engine sunk at the Oxford Bridge accident from the Arkansas River proved unsuccessful. It is thought that one of the new spikes have been driven through the drivers of the engine.
[STATE NEWS.]
Winfield Courier, June 28, 1883.
The new bridge across the Arkansas River west of this city, in our opinion, will be a failure if the board allow the contractor to build it in the place selected by him for that purpose. The approaches on both sides of the river were completely washed out during the last rise, and will continue to wash out every time the river gets on a little high. A dirt fill will not do. If the bridge is constructed at the present location, a good substantial trestle work will have to be built extending fully a hundred feet from the waters edge on either side.
A. C. Democrat.
Arkansas City Traveler, July 4, 1883.
Work upon the new Arkansas River Bridge west of town has commenced.
Arkansas City Traveler, July 11, 1883.
Mr. Ed. Grady, of the Arkansas City Lumber Yard, has secured the contract for the supply of the lumber for the additional 400 feet of the bridge over the Arkansas River west of town. It will take about four car loads of lumber.
Arkansas City Traveler, July 11, 1883.
Recovered.
The body of Howard Finley, the engineer lost at the Oxford Bridge accident, was found by Mr. D. Y. Finney, of Kaw Agency, in a drift in the Arkansas River some ten miles south of the above Agency. The body was fully identified by the articles found upon it, and the authorities of the K. C. L. & S. being notified, a committee consisting of Messrs. Volt and Hildebrand were dispatched for the remains, arriving in our city last Saturday morning when they proceeded direct to the Territory, returning with the body the following day.
Caldwell Journal, July 12, 1883.
From the Wellington Press: The Belle Plaine wagon bridge over the Ninnescah gave way last Saturday evening at 6 o’clock. S. L. McMullen, of Harper, was driving a herd of horses across it. The two spans next to Belle Plaine went through with 50 horses, 9 of which were killed outright, six more were shot in mercy, and several others are cut badly, have eyes put out, etc. The facts in the case seem to be that the bridge was very rotten, and Mr. McMullen drove more horses onto it than the law allows, and that the horses were on a trot. It is very doubtful whether the county is liable for the loss.
Winfield Courier, July 12, 1883.
The bridge across the Ninnescah River near Belle Plaine was broken down Saturday by a herd of ponies. A hundred were driven on at once and two spans of the bridge went down, killing seventeen.
Arkansas City Traveler, July 18, 1883.
Work upon the permanent repairing of the Arkansas Bridge south of town is now in progress.
Caldwell Journal, July 19, 1883.
The wagon bridge across the Ninnescah, at Belle Plaine, went down last Saturday week. The destruction was caused by S. L. McMullen, of Harper, driving about 100 horses across it all at once. Sixteen horses were killed and drowned. It was thought at one time that McMullen ought to be made to pay for the damage to the bridge, but a close examination of the timbers disclosed the fact that they were completely rotten, and the wonder is that the bridge had not gone down sooner. The county will now be under the necessity of putting up a new bridge on the piers, which are said to be in good condition. If the commissioners are wise, they will secure an iron bridge, as it will be cheaper in the long run than a wooden structure.
Arkansas City Traveler, August 1, 1883.
Belle Plaine is to have a new bridge across the Ninnescah at a cost of $2,000.
Arkansas City Traveler, August 1, 1883.
The bridge across the Arkansas south of town was permanently repaired and the floor relaid this week and from this time on we trust no further inconvenience will result from the late accident.
Arkansas City Traveler, August 1, 1883.
August Lorry, Bolton’s genial trustee, has been rather an institution around town while superintending the repairs on the south bridge.
Arkansas City Traveler, August 1, 1883.
We took a walk to the new Arkansas River Bridge last Sunday and were surprised at the progress made; the structure being more than two-thirds way across the stream at that time, and at the same rate of working, its completion may be looked for by the end of the week. Its convenience to parties living west of Arkansas City cannot be underrated and consequently it cannot fail of bringing a good thing to the city as well as the county, a mutual benefit indeed.
Caldwell Journal, August 2, 1883.
County commissioners Sherman and Hunt were in session Monday and Tuesday. The lease existing between Belle Plaine Township and Sumner County was canceled and the township gave a quit claim deed of the bridge to the county. The commissioners then contracted with the Missouri Valley Bridge Works for two spans of an iron bridge on the old piers for $2,000. This is a sensible solution of the difficulty. The bridge is to be completed by November 1st. Wellington Press.
Arkansas City Traveler, August 15, 1883.
Two spans of the Arkansas River Bridge at Great Bend were washed away last Saturday.
Arkansas City Traveler, August 15, 1883.
The Arkansas River was up bank full again this week. It is a good thing to have a bridge when the river is full.
[BRIDGE COMPLETED.]
Arkansas City Traveler, August 15, 1883.
We are glad to chronicle the completion of the bridge across the Arkansas River west of town. This bridge will be a great convenience to the residents in West Bolton and while accommodating them, will materially help the prosperity of our city, in that it will bring to our merchants a large amount of trade that has been forced to go elsewhere.
[NEW BRIDGE.]
Arkansas City Traveler, Wednesday, August 22, 1883.
OUR NEW BRIDGE. Now that our new bridge across the Arkansas River, west of town, is completed and accepted by competent judges, it is well to give Mr. Hill credit for having done a No. 1 job, and contrary to the general rule in such cases, he finished the work ahead of the contract time, for which he deserves the thanks of all to whom the bridge is of benefit.
Arkansas City Traveler, August 22, 1883.
The Arkansas River Bridge west of town is now open for travel, and the residents of the western portion of Bolton Township can now come to our city without making an all day’s trip of it.
Arkansas City Traveler, August 22, 1883.
The Arkansas River Bridge, west of town, has been completed in advance of time and is well done. It is now the duty of those who subscribed to the same and have not paid to do so at once. The papers are at the Cowley County Bank. Gentlemen, call and settle as well and promptly as Mr. Hill has completed your bridge.
Arkansas City Traveler, September 12, 1883.
The widow of H. E. Finley, the engineer who lost his life in the Oxford Bridge accident, last week received a check for $2,000 from the A. O. U. W., of which order deceased was a member.
Arkansas City Traveler, September 19, 1883.
It would be a great convenience to farmers directly east of town to have the Walnut Bridge at Harmon’s ford. Grouse Creek needs a bridge, too, at or near Silverdale, and the road through the sand to the Arkansas Bridge needs reworking. A proposition to vote bonds for these improvements would meet with more favor than the third railroad in Cowley in our estimation.
Arkansas City Traveler, October 10, 1883.
LOST. A plate book with cuttings of fruit, etc., between Arkansas City and Geuda Springs, by way of the new bridge, on Monday, October 8. Finder will please return to the Central Avenue Hotel and receive pay for trouble.
Arkansas City Traveler, Wednesday, October 24, 1883.
Competency.
The muddle-pated ignoramus upstairs seems to be worried this week because someone has told him that Capt. Nipp’s signature is not exactly Spencerian in symmetry. Capt. Nipp’s right hand was unfortunately selected as a lodging place for a rebel bullet during the war, which forces him in many instances to use that useful member, not as he would, but as he can. This misfortune will redound largely to his credit among the loyal and sensible men of this county; however much it may rankle in the bosom of an antiquated fossil who as assessor of this township had not even sense enough to know what ought to be done, but was only selected for that office to advance certain bridge and other interests of some of our citizens. The Democrat may wildly chatter and claw its digits through the air, but the fact still remains that the people will recognize in Capt. Nipp a clear headed businessman of integrity who will see to it that the best interests of Cowley County are secured.
Winfield Courier, December 13, 1883.
Gus Lorry was up from Bolton Monday looking after the interest of that community in the bridge question. He wants to see the county assume the care and maintenance of all the bridges in the county and will take steps to bring his views before the Board at the next meeting. It will relieve Bolton of a heavy load.
1884
[BAD ACCIDENT CROSSING ARKANSAS BRIDGE WEST OF TOWN.]
Arkansas City Traveler, January 2, 1884.
Sad Accident. An accident of the most distressing nature befell Mr. and Mrs. Leach, of West Bolton, as they were crossing the Arkansas bridge west of town last Wednesday afternoon. It would appear that Mr. Leach’s team became scared at the foam blown by the wind below the bridge, and while attempting to pass a buggy, in which were seated Messrs. Chas. Howard and Sam Burriss, commenced to back, breaking the railing and falling backwards into the water. The wagon fell upon Mrs. Leach, and had it not been for Mr. Burriss, who immediately jumped to the rescue, and Mr. Leach, the lady would have drowned. As it was, she remained insensible until she arrived in the city, when she was placed under the care of Dr. Reed, who, upon examination, found one of her legs was broken above the ankle, the ankle being badly bruised, the left arm was broken, also a rib, and the skull badly bruised. At this writing the unfortunate lady is doing as well as could be expected, and we hope may speedily recover from her injuries. The railing of the bridge should be strengthened in some way, for as it now stands, it is no protection at all.
Arkansas City Traveler, January 23, 1884.
There is a dangerous hole in the floor of the south bridge which should be attended to immediately, and thus prevent the breaking of some horse’s leg and the consequent suing of our township for damages. We believe, though, it is in the part of the bridge belonging to Bolton Township. However this may be, it should be repaired at once.
Arkansas City Traveler, January 30, 1884.
Mrs. Leech, who it will be remembered sustained severe injuries by falling from the Arkansas River bridge a few weeks since, we are glad to say is rapidly recovering, and her physician, Dr. R. H. Reed, thinks she will experience no permanent ill effects from the accident.
[BRIDGE NEEDED OVER WALNUT RIVER AT HARMON’S FORD.]
Arkansas City Traveler, February 20, 1884.
The southern part of this county stands greatly in need of a bridge over the Walnut by Harmon’s ford. The Walnut is subject to sudden rises, either from heavy rains or backwater from the Arkansas, and oftentimes farmers are compelled to travel several extra miles in order to reach our market. We believe it would be a paying move for Arkansas City’s businessmen to take hold of this matter. Last fall there were on an average fifteen loads of stone per day hauled across Harmon’s ford, besides about fifty loads of grain, etc., by the farmers. A bridge at this point would greatly facilitate travel and be a blessing to the farmers east of us.
[GROUSE CREEK ON FLOODING RAMPAGE AGAIN.]
Arkansas City Traveler, February 20, 1884.
Grouse Creek was full of water again last week for several days, compelling the farmers to stay at home until the water went down. The Territory folks had to postpone their visit until a more favorable opportunity. It would cost about $1,000 to put up a bridge over this generally placid stream that would answer all purposes for several years, and the TRAVELER for one would like to see it accomplished.
Winfield Courier, February 21, 1884.
The citizens of Oxford have raised $4,000 for a bridge across the Arkansas at that place.
It will be put in at once.
Arkansas City Traveler, February 27, 1884.
A petition to the county commissioners asking them to call an election for the voting of township bonds to build a bridge across the Walnut east of town is being circulated. We need a bridge, but in our judgment this is not the most feasible means for supplying the need.
Arkansas City Republican, March 1, 1884.
A petition, asking that a bridge be built across the Walnut at Harmon’s Ford, has received the necessary number of signers to secure an election. This bridge will be of great benefit to both city and country.
Arkansas City Traveler, March 5, 1884.
Stone repairs are needed upon the bridge over the Arkansas River south of town, and also upon the road leading thereto. The attention of the proper parties is called to this matter.
Arkansas City Traveler, March 5, 1884.
It is only a matter of equity in asking the aid of the county in the matter of constructing a bridge across the Arkansas River at Harmon’s ford, east of town. It is a necessity, and whatever benefits one part of the county indirectly benefits the whole. See the point.
Arkansas City Republican, March 8, 1884.
At a meeting of the assessors last Monday, a committee was appointed to draw up a petition to the county commissioners, and circulate it in the different townships, asking the county to assume control of all bridges in the county and keep them in proper repair.
Arkansas City Traveler, March 12, 1884.
An election is called for the purpose of determining whether Creswell Township shall issue $5,000 in bonds for constructing a bridge across the Walnut River east of town, said election to be held on the 5th of April. That such a bridge is a necessity will be granted by everybody having occasion to cross this uncertain stream. It moreover will be a factor of trade for our city, as during high water many farmers get into the very bad habit of going to Winfield or some other out of the way place to transact their business, which habit will disappear altogether with the advent of a new bridge. We honestly believe it will be for the farmers’ and business interests to carry this election in favor of the bonds. Let there be a full vote in the affirmative.
Arkansas City Traveler, March 12, 1884.
ELECTION NOTICE. To the qualified voters of Creswell Township, Cowley County, Kansas. Notice is hereby given, in pursuance of a petition duly presented to the township trustee, treasurer, and clerk of said township, on the 4th day of March, 1884, that on the 5th day of April, 1884, between the hours of 8 a.m. and 6 p.m. of said day, at the usual place of holding elections in and for said Creswell Township, Cowley County, Kansas, a special election of the qualified voters of said township will be held for the purpose of voting upon a proposition to issue the bonds of said Creswell Township, in the amount of five thousand ($5,000) dollars; said bonds to run ten years, and to draw interest at the rate of seven percent per annum, payable semi-annually, principal and interest payable at the fiscal agency of the state of Kansas, in the city of New York. Said bonds to be issued and used for the purpose of building a bridge over the Walnut River near Arkansas City in said county, at the point, or as near thereto as practicable, where the north line of section thirty one, township thirty-four, south range 4, east, crosses said river, and what is known as Harmon’s ford. Said special election to be conducted according to the general election laws of the state of Kansas, and those in favor of building the bridge as aforesaid, shall have written on their ballots “For the bridge and bonds,” and those voting against the building of the bridge as aforesaid, shall have written or printed on their ballots the words “Against the bridge and bonds.”
By order of the township trustee, treasurer, and clerk of Creswell Township, Cowley County, Kansas. Done at Arkansas City, Kansas, this 4th day of March, 1884.
M. N. SINNOTT, Trustee.
JAS. L. HUEY, Treasurer.
W. D. MOWRY, Clerk.
Winfield Courier, March 13, 1884.
A contract has been let to the Leavenworth Bridge Company to build a combination bridge across the Arkansas River at Oxford at a cost of $6,000. The work is to be completed by the first of June next.
Arkansas City Traveler, March 26, 1884.
Vote for the bridge bonds on the 5th of next month.
Arkansas City Republican, March 29, 1884.
EDITORIAL PAGE: C. T. ATKINSON, EDITOR.
THE PROPOSED BRIDGE AT HARMON’S FORD.
An election has been called by the authorities of Creswell Township, for April 5th, 1884, for the purpose of voting $5,000 in bonds for the erection of a bridge at Harmon’s Ford. Many reasons can be adduced in favor of this measure. The farmers of eastern Creswell have aided the other portions of the township in building bridges. The bridge west of town, the one south of it, and the one at Searing & Mead’s flouring mill. These parties who now seek the bridge at the ford have received but little benefit, while their [WORD BLANKED OUT] have contributed to the erection of these necessary structures. Since the canal has been built, much mud and sand have accumulated at the mouth, and but a slight rain causes the Walnut to be impassable. These persons must then go to our city by the way of the mill, or return home. Someone may say, “Who travels this road?” We would say that the farmers of eastern Creswell, southern Silverdale, and in fact, all the residents of Grouse Creek and the lower Arkansas travel this road. The trade and traders from the Kaw and Osage agencies come to Arkansas City by this route. There is a prospect that the county will assume all responsibility for this bridge, but it may not, and it will not do for us to await such tardy action. If it does, so much the better, but we need run no risk. Much of the grading will be done by private parties. The assurance of such action is the word of such men as George Whitney, F. M. Vaughn, R. L. Marshall, and others, whose words are as good as their bond, and the bond or word of any of these gentlemen is always at par.
Arkansas City Republican, March 29, 1884.
Since the canal has been made from the Arkansas to the Walnut River, the mud carried through it has dammed the mouth of the Walnut and backed the water up to Harmon’s ford, so that it is too deep at times to cross with safety; and inasmuch as there is as great an amount of travel on that road, being the nearest on to Kaw and Osage agencies, Silverdale, and the lower Arkansas and Grouse Creek, a bridge should be put up for the accommodation of the public. Besides most of the stone used for building comes from the bluff directly opposite, and it would be money well invested as a matter of economy. The county will soon take all these bridges upon itself and it would be nothing lost to have one.
Arkansas City Traveler, April 2, 1884.
Vote for the bridge bonds.
Arkansas City Traveler, April 9, 1884.
The bridge bonds election carried last Saturday by 152 majority out of 410 votes cast. The only objection to the election is that the sum is too large by half, and we hope the trustee will see to it that not more than $2,500 or $3,000 are expended on the new bridge. Otherwise, we are satisfied with result.
Arkansas City Republican, April 12, 1884.
The bonds for the bridge over the Walnut River at Harmon’s Ford were carried at the election last Saturday by a vote of 284 to 129.
Arkansas City Republican, April 12, 1884.
J. W. Irons, who lives ten miles east on Grouse Creek, was in the city last Saturday in the interest of the bridge bonds. He called in to see us in the afternoon. Mr. Irons is one of the principal farmers and stock men of his neighborhood. We are always glad to receive calls from such gentlemen.
[BRIDGE MEETING.]
Winfield Courier, April 24, 1884.
On last Saturday afternoon a large meeting was held in the Courthouse for the purpose of discussing the feasibility of the County purchasing the various bridges built over the Walnut and Arkansas Rivers and one over Timber Creek, all of which have been built by the Townships and by individual subscriptions; and also building some others much needed in different portions of the county. It being a fact that all the costly bridges built in the County up to the present time having been built exclusively by the townships and by individual subscriptions, the county itself never having invested a single dollar in any of them, cannot under our present laws expend a single dollar in repair on said bridges, and the burden of keeping them in repair by the townships has become a very onerous one and in consideration of the fact that several townships having control of said bridges, are desirous of selling said bridges to the county for a normal sum, say for one dollar ($1.00) apiece, and thus shift the responsibility of keeping them in repair onto the county. It was thought best by many of the leading citizens, both of the city of Winfield, and also of the several townships, to call a meeting of citizens and discuss the feasibility of the change. The meeting was organized by calling C. A. Bliss to the chair, with H. H. Martin as secretary. A motion being carried that a committee of three be appointed by the chair to draft resolutions expressive of the sense of the meeting, Col. McMullen, William Moore, and Jessie Isenagle were appointed as said committee, who after some deliberation reported the following.
WHEREAS, There are many valuable bridges already built in the county, and
WHEREAS, These bridges have been erected at great cost by the townships building the same, and
WHEREAS, These bridges are kept in repair at the expense of said townships, and the same have become burdensome to the people by whom they were built, and in justice to the taxpayers of said locations ought to be transferred to the county,
Therefore, Resolved, That the county ought to own all the bridges within its limits valued at $500 dollars and over, and further,
Resolved, That it is the sense of this meeting—1st: That the county purchase and own all bridges of the value of $500 and over, and—2nd: erect others when the same may be necessary in the county, having in view the greatest good to the greatest number of people.
The above report of the committee was received and unanimously adopted.
A motion was then made, and carried, that it is the sense of this meeting, that a special election be called to submit to the qualified electors of Cowley County, Kansas, the question of the county purchasing all the bridges of the various townships owning bridges of the value of $500 and over at a nominal sum of, say one dollar ($1.00) each, and of building some others, and if the same cannot be done at a special election, that it be submitted to a vote of the qualified electors of the county at the next general election; if it is found upon further investigation that the county has the power under the law to purchase the same.
A motion being put and carried that a committee of three be appointed to confer with the county attorney in regard to the legality of calling a special election, or of submitting to the qualified electors of the county, the question of purchasing the bridges, and also to ascertain whether the county has the power under the law to purchase said bridges, and if so, to prepare through legal advice petitions to the county commissioners to call said election. L. F. Johnson, of Beaver, W. M. Sleeth, of Creswell, and H. H. Martin, of Vernon, were appointed as said committee, with instructions, if necessary, to call another meeting after such meeting adjourned sine die. C. A. BLISS, Chairman.
H. H. MARTIN, Secretary.
[BRIDGES.]
Arkansas City Republican, April 26, 1884.
At a meeting last Saturday at the courthouse, in Winfield, held for the purpose of discussing the project of the county’s purchasing all the bridges built by the several townships, and costing $500 or over, for the nominal sum of $1.00, it was decided to be the sense of the persons assembled that such action be taken. A committee of three, consisting of L. F. Johnson, of Beaver; W. M. Sleeth, of Creswell; and H. H. Martin, of Vernon, were appointed to confer with the county attorney concerning the legality of calling a special election, or of submitting to the qualified electors of the county the question of purchasing the bridges and also to ascertain whether the county has the power under the law to purchase said bridges, and if so, to prepare through legal advice petitions to the county commissioners to call said election, and with instructions, if necessary, to call another meeting.
Arkansas City Republican, May 3, 1884.
The contract for the Walnut River Bridge will be let May 24, and the bridge should be completed by the middle of July. A bridge would have been very convenient during the last week of high water.
Arkansas City Traveler, May 7, 1884.
River Survey.
We received a pleasant call last Monday from Capt. Burrows and Lieut. F. P. Spalding, who have been lying near our city, on the Arkansas River, waiting instructions the past three days. From these gentlemen we gather the following particulars with reference to the survey which is under the direction of Major M. B. Adams, of the U. S. Corps of engineers, with Capt. Burrows in charge and Lieut. Spalding as assistant, with a force of twenty men. Mr. E. B. Adams is levelman and Mr. M. A. Orlopp recorder of the expedition. The object is to definitely settle the feasibility of the navigation of the Arkansas River between Fort Gibson and this city and possibly Wichita; and the length of river over which the present survey will extend is 315 miles and will take about five months to complete. The corps left Wichita March 31, and to this point report plenty of water. Considerable delay was caused by the west Arkansas River Bridge here, which was so low that it necessitated the removal of the cabin from the boat before it was possible to pass. No difficulty whatever was experienced in going over the dam. In fact, the boys seemed to appreciate the run. Yesterday morning they bade adieu and by this time we presume are within the bounds of the Indian Territory.
Arkansas City Republican, May 10, 1884.
J. K. Sawyer, of Wichita, contractor and bridge builder, and agent of the Wrought Iron Bridge Co., Canton, Ohio, was in this city this week looking at the Walnut River, where the new bridge is to be built. He will put in a bid on the contract.
Arkansas City Republican, May 10, 1884.
Last Wednesday afternoon Mr. Job Farrar and Mr. Foss, Mrs. H. P. Farrar’s father, having in charge Mr. H. P. Farrar’s little son, attempted to cross the Walnut at Harmon’s ford. The water was much deeper than anticipated, and the team, encumbered by the wagon, was soon submerged. Fortunately the wagon-bed became disengaged from the running gear, and floated off. Coming in contact with the branches of a tree, the gentlemen succeeded in saving themselves and the little boy. Both horses were drowned. No stronger argument for a bridge at this ford could be adduced.
Arkansas City Traveler, May 14, 1884.
A Narrow Escape. Last Wednesday afternoon Messrs. J. P. Farrar and James A. Foss, with H. P. Farrar’s little boy, narrowly escaped a watery grave. Mr. Farrar having been informed during the day that teams were crossing at Harmon’s ford, and having business on the side of the Walnut, drove into the stream with no hesitation whatever. The horses, which were small, were no sooner fairly in the water than they began to swim, the swift current carrying them downstream. Fortunately, and before the wagon had time to swing away from the bank, a tree obstructed their progress, when the men jumped out, with the youthful navigator in Mr. Foss’ arms. The wagon and ponies then sank. On Sunday the ponies were fished out and the harness taken from them so that the only loss sustained is that of the team, which is very slight considering the chances in favor of the entire party drowning. The Walnut is a very treacherous stream, rising and falling in a few hours’ time. The bridge soon to be constructed at this ford, however, will put an end to such possibilities as that of last Wednesday.
Arkansas City Traveler, May 28, 1884.
No bids for the bridge across the Walnut River have as yet been accepted by the township board.
Arkansas City Republican, May 31, 1884.
The bids for the work on the bridge to be built at Harmon’s Ford ranged from $5,775 for highest, to $4,650 for lowest. They were rejected and a notice will be given for new bids.
Arkansas City Republican, May 31, 1884.
An accident occurred at the Arkansas Bridge, west of town, last Sunday. The team of a couple from Geuda Springs became frightened, and when lashed, plunged over the embankment, casting the occupants into the mud, breaking the buggy, and otherwise rendering affairs unpleasant. Fortunately the resting place of the persons was soft, and they therefore escaped injury.
Arkansas City Traveler, June 4, 1884.
The bidders for the new bridge over the Walnut, knowing the amount voted, are showing that they are bidding with reference to this amount. They lose sight of the fact that our township board has pledged itself not to go beyond $2,500 in building this bridge, which resulted in the rejection of all the bids opened last week. Don’t be too hoggish, gentlemen.
Arkansas City Traveler, June 18, 1884.
It is to be hoped the road between Arkansas City and the south bridge will be substantially improved with the aid of the township and city appropriations made therefor. It will be a good investment for the city.
Excerpt...
Arkansas City Traveler, June 18, 1884.
Council Proceedings.
Moved and carried that the council appropriate $100 out of any money not otherwise appropriated to repair the road south of the city and north of the Arkansas River bridge.
Arkansas City Traveler, June 18, 1884.
Our Canal.
By far the severest strain upon our canal headgates since their construction was that of the high water of last week, when the Arkansas came within four feet of touching the bridge; yet the gates withstood the immense pressure, despite the fears that the wall would be undermined. Considering the great amount of sand in the river bed, this is pretty good proof of the solidity of the stonework at the headgates. The time will come when there will be solid stone walls up and down the river at this point, with stone bottom to the canal proper, and such other work as may be necessary to place this great enterprise beyond the influence of high water. The owners are devoting all incomes resulting from mill rentals to perfecting this splendid water power, which is today the finest thing of its kind west of the Mississippi. The Arkansas City Water Power company have expended over $100,000 in the construction of this canal and in encouraging mill enterprises, and to this, more than any other agency, we owe our marvelous prosperity as a city. A city with a good water power is always a success, and we have the finest power in the West.
Arkansas City Traveler, July 2, 1884.
The south bridge was broken through last Saturday evening while attempting to cross it with a steam thresher. A force of men were soon at work, and in a few hours the bridge was in shape for travel.
Arkansas City Traveler, July 2, 1884.
Bridge Building.
The township board met last Friday evening to receive and open bids for building the bridge across the Walnut at Harmon’s ford. The following bids were received and passed upon.
Bullene Bridge company, $4,400, with 5 percent discount for cash.
Missouri Valley Bridge company, $4,400.
Smith Bridge company, $4,000.
Kansas City Bridge company, $4,475.
King Bridge company, $4,500.
Raymond & Campbell, $4,535.
Canton, Ohio, Bridge company—iron, $4,300; combination, $3,900.
M. S. Hasie—iron, $4,385; combination, $3,435.
James Hill, combination bridge on piling, $3,806 and $2,500—the former bid for a four-span bridge, each span fifty-two feet.
After carefully considering the question, the contract was awarded to the Canton Bridge company, whose agent is Mr. J. R. Sawyer, of Wichita. The bridge will be of iron, with two spans of seventy-five feet each, and seventy-six feet of approaches. Their bid, $4,300, is $700 less than their former bid, and they give forty feet more bridge.
The bridge near Searing & Mead’s mill, for which the township paid $2,200, is only eighty feet long, and the piers were already furnished, besides which no approaches were built by the contractors. While the sum to be paid for the new bridge is rather more than the people wished to pay, yet the bridge as completed will be the best one in this part of the county, and we hope to soon see it underway.
Arkansas City Traveler, July 9, 1884.
The culvert bridge, this side of the Walnut, nearing Searing & Mead’s Mill, was broken through last Saturday by a steam thresher.
Winfield Courier, May 1, 1884.
SCISSORED PARAGRAPHS.
Interesting Items Gathered from Our Neighboring Exchanges.
OXFORD REGISTER.
The river surveyors unceremoniously cut through the mill dam, to take their boats through, damaging it to the amount of about $300.
Two boats, carrying about twenty-two government surveyors, are anchored about a mile north of the bridge. The object, they say, is to straighten the river if possible, but it seems that the government has taken this mode to use the money appropriated for the improvement of the Arkansas River. This is the third time they have surveyed the river and nothing of any importance has been done.
[BRIDGE MEETING.]
Winfield Courier, May 8, 1884.
THE BRIDGE MEETING.
I notice in the columns of your paper of last week the proceedings of a bridge meeting. I have talked with several of the taxpayers of this township on the subject, and am satisfied that this township would be in favor of the county buying the bridges already built by the several townships; and of building bridges in the future at the expense of the county instead of the townships. But it seems to me that it would be imprudent to hold a special election about the matter. The expense of an election of this county costs about $800. This is a trifle for a county so large and wealthy as Cowley, but it is worth saving; and I would suggest that we take a vote on that matter at the general election in November, and, instead of spending that amount to hold a special election, that it be appropriated to repair the bridges proposed to be bought.
While there may be no law authorizing appropriations by the county to repair bridges belonging to any township, I believe it would be generally approved from the fact that it is right that any bridge that is free for the use of everybody should be kept in repair at the expense of the public. Yours Truly, H. J. SANDFORT.
Winfield Courier, May 8, 1884.
ARKANSAS CITY REPUBLICAN.
The Arkansas River was up three feet above its usual height last week, but has now gone down again.
The contract for the Walnut River Bridge will be let May 24, and the bridge should be completed by the middle of July. A bridge would have been very convenient during the last week of high water.
Winfield Courier, May 15, 1884.
ARKANSAS CITY TRAVELER.
We received a pleasant call last Monday from Capt. Burrow and Lieut. F. P. Spalding, who have been lying near our city, on the Arkansas River, waiting instructions the past three days. From these gentlemen we gather the following particulars with reference to the survey which is under the direction of Major M. B. Adams, of the U. S. corps of engineers, with Capt. Burrows in change and Lieut. Spalding, as assistant, with a force of twenty men. Mr. E. B. Adams is levelman and Mr. M. A. Orlopp recorder of the expedition. The object is to definitely settle the feasibility of the navigation of the Arkansas River between Fort Gibson and this city and possibly Wichita, and the length of river over which the present survey will extend is 315 miles and will take about five months to complete. The corps left Wichita, March 31, and to this point report plenty of water. Considerable delay was caused by the west Arkansas River Bridge here, which was so low that it necessitated the removal of the cabin from the boat before it was possible to pass. No difficulty whatever was experienced in coming over the dam. In fact, the boys seemed to appreciate the fun. Yesterday morning they bade adieu and by this time we presume are within the bounds of the Indian Territory.
Winfield Courier, May 15, 1884.
ARKANSAS CITY DEMOCRAT.
The break in the canal has been repaired, and everything is in apple-pie order again.
Winfield Courier, June 5, 1884.
NEIGHBORING EXCHANGES.
ARKANSAS CITY REPUBLICAN.
An accident occurred at the Arkansas bridge, west of town, last Sunday. The team of a couple from Geuda Springs became frightened, and when lashed, plunged over the embankment, casting the occupants into the mud, breaking the buggy, and otherwise rendering affairs unpleasant. Fortunately the resting place of the persons was soft, and they therefore escaped injury.
Arkansas City Republican, June 28, 1884.
The roads in Bolton Township, south of the Arkansas River Bridge, are in bad condition.
Arkansas City Republican, June 28, 1884.
The time for the reception of bids for the new bridge at Harmon’s Ford expired yesterday. Some nine or ten bids were received; but the board has not held a meeting for their consideration.
Arkansas City Republican, July 5, 1884.
The contract for building the bridge across the Walnut, at Harmon’s Ford, was awarded last Saturday to the Canton Bridge Company, of Canton, Ohio.
Arkansas City Republican, July 5, 1884.
A steam thresher passed over the south Arkansas bridge last Saturday; the floor of the bridge gave way. Through the energy of trustee Sinnott, the place was speedily repaired.
Arkansas City Republican, July 26, 1884.
Over the bridges leading to our city are some fine signs painted by that excellent workman, Ed. Ferguson.
Arkansas City Traveler, July 30, 1884.
The South Bridge.
Much complaint is being heard as to the condition of the south bridge floor, which is badly in need of repair. Our friends in Bolton Township are particularly clamorous on this subject. In this connection we will say our impression is that Bolton owns two-fifths of this bridge, and has agreed to pay two-fifths of the expense necessary to keep it in repair; but we are informed that for nearly two years Creswell Township has borne the entire burden, and that today Bolton Township owes Creswell between $300 and $400 on account of repairing the bridge. This sum, if paid, would be sufficient to place the floor in good condition once more. The interests of the two townships are identical, and they should work in harmony. It is not right for our friends across the river to expect Creswell Township to take entire charge of the bridge, simply because Arkansas City is located therein. The benefits accruing to our businessmen are certainly of no more consequence than is the convenience afforded to the farmers by a substantial bridge. We want to see this bridge kept in good order, even if our township must issue scrip therefor; but we submit that our Bolton Township friends are somewhat behind in their part of the contract, and we fear there is a too general feeling among them to let Creswell do it all.
Arkansas City Republican, August 23, 1884.
The Walnut Bridge.
The report that the Canton Bridge Co., had thrown up the contract for the bridge at Harmon’s Ford is unfounded. From a letter received by W. D. Mowry, we learn that work will be commenced between the 1st and 10th of September and that the bridge will be completed according to contract. Our Walnut friends will now rest easy.
Arkansas City Republican, September 6, 1884.
The timbers for the bridge across the Walnut at Harmon’s Ford have begun to arrive. The timbers are being shipped from Arkansas, and the iron from Canton, Ohio. Mr. Sawyer, the contractor, will be here to commence work as soon as the materials are on the ground, and writes he will have the bridge completed, according to the specifications, by October 3, 1884. This is good news.
Arkansas City Traveler, September 10, 1884.
The contractors have begun hauling lumber to Harmon’s ford for the new bridge. This bridge cannot be built too soon, as that ford is very uncertain. It is very seldom now that it can be used, and then only by those thoroughly acquainted with it. The completion of the bridge will be a great benefit to those living east of the Walnut.
Winfield Courier, September 18, 1884.
A bridge meeting will be held at the Courthouse in Winfield, at two o’clock next Saturday, for the purpose of considering the public bridge question as relating to the people of the county. Let all turn out. Order of Com.
Excerpt...
Arkansas City Traveler, Wednesday, October 1, 1884.
We have today petitions in circulation in this city praying the county commissioners to submit to Cowley’s voters a proposition for the county to purchase the three bridges now owned by Creswell and Bolton Townships. Will the county commissioners act on this before the general election? If Arkansas City, with its Republican majority, defeats King, is anyone foolish enough to suppose the county will help take this bridge burden from our shoulders? In the coming years we may frequently desire to call on the county at large for aid. The county is Republican; so is Arkansas City; and if we do not show a reasonable degree of fairness in politics, we cannot blame the rest of the county for working against us in matters purely local.
Arkansas City Traveler, October 1, 1884.
Mr. J. H. Sherburne came very near losing a horse on the Arkansas River Bridge south of town, last Sunday night. The floor of this bridge is literally full of holes, through one of which Mr. Sherburne’s horse fell, and it was only by careful work that the animal was saved. Our township trustee should make it his business to look after this bridge, and it ought to be fixed with some idea to permanency.
Arkansas City Republican, October 4, 1884.
J. H. Sherburne, while driving across the south Arkansas bridge Sunday evening had his horse fall through a hole in the bridge floor. The horse went through up to his hips, and it was with great difficulty that the animal was removed from his perilous position. Some of the flooring had to be removed in the operation.
Arkansas City Republican, October 4, 1884.
Parties living in Bolton Township coming to Arkansas City the first of the week had to go around by the way of the west bridge, on account of the south bridge being repaired.
Arkansas City Republican, October 4, 1884.
S. K. Sawyer, the contractor for the Harmon’s Ford bridge, arrived in Arkansas City Thursday.
Arkansas City Republican, October 4, 1884.
A letter from Canton Bridge Company to Geo. Whitney states that the piers and irons started from Canton on the 25th of last month.
Excerpt...
Arkansas City Traveler, Wednesday, October 8, 1884.
MR. SCHIFFBAUER AS A LEGISLATOR.
“If wishes were horses, all could ride,” and if promises made during a canvass were all that is required to secure election, the result would be simply narrowed down to a soft-soap basis. The man who could make the most plausible promises would reap the largest harvest of votes. This tickling business seems to have been largely adopted by our worthy mayor in his search for support for the legislature, and the lavishness with which he scatters his promises proves that they cost him nothing, and also proves that they are worth no more to the voter. Right here we wish to state that whatever we say concerning Mr. Schiffbauer has been gained from reliable Democratic or independent sources, and is not published with any desire to misrepresent him. We are credibly informed that our mayor tells his independent and Democratic followers that the bridge south of this city should be assumed by the state, “and if I am elected, I will see that it is done,” says Frank. This is obviously a bid for Bolton Township’s vote. It is a very seductive promise, and if Bolton Township were peopled with ignorant voters, it might have its desired effect. But such a statement shows a lamentable lack of intelligence on the part of Mr. Schiffbauer, and augurs ill for his success as a creditable representative. There isn’t a bridge in Kansas assumed by the state; there isn’t a bridge in the United States assumed by any state. There have been laws passed in our state legislature authorizing different counties to assume the bridges therein, when certain conditions have been complied with, and this law is in force in Cowley County today; and Mr. Schiffbauer’s election to the legislature can have no influence whatever on the bridge question—even supposing this to be his motive for running.
We will change this statement. His election would have some influence. He could not be elected without a large Republican vote in Creswell and Bolton Townships, and, as we said last week, this would simply cut us off from the county and leave us with no hope for aid from outside townships in the future. This is not mere idle talk. It is solid fact, as our people will realize sooner or later. We do not say that Mr. King’s election guarantees certain relief in bridge matters, or any other special legislation; but we do say that his defeat through Republican disaffection in this city will go largely toward drawing the hostility of the entire county upon us.
We cannot believe that Bolton Township’s voters are so easily fooled as to allow Mr. Schiffbauer’s eager promises to mislead them. He has never been accused of being a special friend of the farmer, freighter, or laboring man, and nothing but his sublime cheek enables him to approach these people for their votes—that and his determination to “get there” by any means in his power.
Arkansas City Republican, October 11, 1884.
In each township of Cowley County petitions are in circulation asking that the county commissioners submit a proposition to the lawful voters of our county for the purchase of the bridges in the county. The two bridges across the Arkansas River should at least be owned by the county above all others. The Arkansas is a government stream and does anyone else know of bridges being owned by the township, when they span a government stream. All bridges within a county should be owned and sustained by the county, for are they not a benefit to the people at large as well as they are a great benefit to the community in which they are located.
Arkansas City Republican, October 11, 1884.
S. Matlack had Ed. Ferguson place at each one of the canal bridges a nobby sign advertising his stock.
Excerpt...
Arkansas City Republican, October 11, 1884.
Beaver Briefs.
Beaver Township is to have a bridge across the Arkansas River.
Arkansas City Traveler, October 15, 1884.
A cattleman from the Territory was in the city on Monday of this week, and remarked to one of our merchants that he would like to do his trading here, but there was never any certainty that our south bridge was fit to cross, which often influenced him and his friends to go elsewhere. There are many just such instances as this. The bridge now is in a very dangerous condition, and the township trustee or city authorities should see to it that something is done toward repairing it, and done speedily, too. We might as well have no bridge at all as to have one full of holes.
[BRIDGES.]
Winfield Courier, October 16, 1884.
The County Commissioners have decided to purchase at a sum not to exceed five dollars all the main-stream bridges in the county, for which an election proclamation is published elsewhere. They will also span the Arkansas near Tannehill with a bridge.
Election Proclamation.
STATE OF KANSAS, COWLEY COUNTY. ) ss.
I. G. H. McIntire, Sheriff of said County, do herein and hereby proclaim and make known to the electors of said County that there will be a general election held in said County at the several election districts therein, on Tuesday, the 4th day of November, A. D. 1884, for the purpose of choosing one President and one Vice President of the United States, one member of Congress for the Third District of the State of Kansas. And the following State officers of the State of Kansas, one Governor, one Lieutenant Governor, one Secretary of State, one Auditor, one Treasurer, one Attorney General, one Superintendent of Public Instruction, one Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, and one Associate Justice of the Supreme Court. Also the following District officers: One Judge of the District Court of the Thirteenth Judicial District; one State Senator for the 27th Senatorial district of the State of Kansas, one Representative for the 66th Representative District of the State of Kansas, one Representative for the 67th Representative district of the State of Kansas, and one Representative for the 68th Representative district of the State of Kansas. Also the following county officers: Clerk of the District Court, Probate Judge, County Attorney, Superintendent of Public Instruction, and a member of the Board of County Commissioners for the First Commissioner district of said County.
And I, the said G. H. McIntire, by order of the Board of County Commissioners do further proclaim and make known that whereas the Board of County Commissioners of Cowley County, Kansas, have determined that it is necessary to purchase at a sum not exceeding five dollars and forever after maintain a certain iron bridge across the Walnut River at a point about 150 feet north of the ½ [?Could be 1/4 or 1/8..hard to read?] section line running east and west through section No. 20, township No. 34 south, of Range No. 3 East in said County, said bridge being near Searing & Meade’s mill, and has been constructed 8 years and originally cost $3,500, and has a 90 foot span and 30 foot span approach and made of iron with plank floor, in good condition; that an election will be held at the time and places aforesaid for the purpose of determining whether the County shall purchase said bridge at a sum not to exceed five dollars. The ballots in favor of said proposition shall have written or printed thereon, “For the purchase of the iron bridge across the Walnut River near Searing and Meade’s mill,” and those against said proposition shall have written or printed thereon, “Against the purchase of the iron bridge across the Walnut River near Searing & Meade’s mill.”
And, whereas, the Board of County Commissioners of said County have determined that it is necessary to purchase at a cost not to exceed five dollars and forever after maintain the wooden bridge across the Arkansas River about a half mile west of Arkansas City, near the half section line running east and west through sections 25 and 26, township No. 34, Range No. 3 east, in said County, said bridge being built on piles driven 15 to 20 feet deep and is 800 feet long, built about one year ago of wood, cost $5,000. Therefore, I do further proclaim and make known by order of said Board of Commissioners that an election will be held at the time and places aforesaid for the purpose of determining whether the county shall purchase said bridge at a cost not to exceed five dollars. The ballots in favor of said proposition shall have written or printed thereon, “for the purchase of the wooden bridge across the Arkansas River about half mile west of Arkansas City,” and the ballots against that proposition shall have written or printed thereon, “against the purchase of the wooden bridge across the Arkansas River about a half mile west of Arkansas City.”
And, whereas the Board of County Commissioners of Cowley County, Kansas, have determined that it is necessary to purchase at a cost not exceeding five dollars and forever after maintain the combination bridge situated about one mile south of Arkansas City in said county across the Arkansas River at a point about 10 rods east and six rods south of the southwest corner of lot No. 4, in section 36, township 34, range 3 east, in said Cowley County, said bridge being about 750 feet long, partly iron and partly wood, the iron part 3 years old and the wood part 5 years old and cost $10,000. Therefore, I do further proclaim and make known by order of said Board of Commissioners that an election will be held at the time and places aforesaid for the purpose of determining whether the county shall purchase said bridge at a cost not exceeding five dollars. The ballots in favor of said proposition shall have written or printed thereon, “For the purchase of the combination bridge across the Arkansas River about one mile south of Arkansas City.” The ballots against said proposition shall have written or printed thereon “Against the purchase of the combination bridge across the Arkansas River about one mile south of Arkansas City.”
And, whereas the Board of County Commissioners of Cowley County, Kansas, have determined that it is necessary to purchase at a cost not exceeding five dollars and forever after maintain the iron bridge across the Walnut River about a half mile west of the south part of the city of Winfield in Vernon Township and in the southwest quarter of section 29, township 32 south of range No. 4 east in said Cowley County, said bridge being built of iron with stone peers and abutments, one span 120 feet with two iron span approaches, one 26 and the other 30 feet, built in 1877 and now in good repair and cost $4,000. Therefore, I do further proclaim and make known by order of said Board of County Commissioners that an election will be held at the time and places aforesaid for the purpose of determining whether the county shall purchase said bridge at a cost not exceeding five dollars. The ballots in favor of said proposition shall have written or printed thereon, “For the purchase of the iron bridge across the Walnut River in Vernon Township,” and those against said proposition shall have written or printed thereon, “Against the purchase of the iron bridge across the Walnut River in Vernon Township.”
And whereas the Board of County Commissioners of Cowley County, Kansas, have determined that it is necessary to purchase at a cost not exceeding five dollars and forever after maintain the iron bridge across the Walnut River about a half mile south of the city of Winfield in Pleasant Valley Township, Cowley County, Kansas, said bridge being built of iron span 150 ft. with two iron approaches and stone abutments built in 1877; in fair repair, cost $4,500; therefore, I do further proclaim and make known by order of said Board of County Commissioners that an election will be held at the time and place aforesaid for the purpose of determining whether the county shall purchase said bridge at a cost not exceeding five dollars. The ballot in favor of said proposition shall have written or printed thereon, “For the purchase of the iron bridge across the Walnut River about a half mile south of the city of Winfield in Pleasant Valley Township,” and the ballots against said proposition shall have written or printed thereon, “Against the purchase of the iron bridge across the Walnut River about a half mile south of the city of Winfield in Pleasant Valley Township.”
And whereas the said Board of County Commissioners of Cowley County, Kansas, deem it necessary to build a bridge across the Arkansas River about 525 feet south of the half section line running east and west through the middle section of twenty-one (21), township thirty-three (33), range three (3) east in Beaver Township, Cowley County, Kansas, said bridge to be built of iron, with stone and iron piers and abutments, length 300 feet, width 14 feet, the estimated cost of which is $6,500 dollars.
Therefore, by order of the said Board of County Commissioners, I do further proclaim and make known that there will be an election held at the time and place aforesaid for the purpose of determining whether the county shall build said bridge at the estimated cost thereof, the ballots in favor of said proposition shall have written and printed thereon, “For the building of the Iron bridge across the Arkansas River in Beaver Township,” and the ballots against said proposition shall have written or printed thereon, “Against the building of the Iron bridge across the Arkansas River in Beaver Township.”
And Whereas the said Board of Commissioners of Cowley County, Kansas, deem it necessary to build an iron bridge across the Walnut River near the section line between sections seven (7) and eighteen (18), township thirty-one (31), range No. four (4) east in Fairview Township, Cowley County, Kansas, the estimated cost of which is $4,500, said bridge to be built of iron, with stone piers, and is 280 feet long.
Therefore, by order of the said Board of County Commissioners, I do further proclaim and make known that there will be an election held at the time and places aforesaid for the purpose of determining whether the county shall build said bridge at the estimated cost thereof.
The ballots in favor of said proposition shall have written or printed thereon “For the building of the Iron bridge across the Walnut River in Fairview Township,” and the ballots against said proposition shall have written or printed thereon, “Against the building of the Iron bridge across the Walnut River in Fairview Township.”
And I do further make known that two ballot boxes will be necessary at each voting precinct, one for the votes for National, State, District, and County officers, and one for the votes on the bridge propositions.
In witness whereof I have hereunto set my hand as the Sheriff of Cowley County, Kansas, at my office in the city of Winfield, this 13th day of October A. D. 1884.
G. H. McINTIRE, Sheriff.
Excerpt...
Arkansas City Republican, October 18, 1884.
“Schiffbauer as a Legislator.”
Editors Republican:
GENTLEMEN: Knowing as I do that you are my political opponents in this campaign, yet I still believe there is still honor and fairness enough in journalism to allow you to publish the following statement in answer to an article published in the Traveler under the title of “Schiffbauer as a Legislator.” The amount of truth there is established in that article I will attempt to show; and I leave the matter to those who were present and heard all the remarks I made whether or not I have made a true statement.
In the first place, Mr. Traveler, you say that article was not with any desire to misrepresent me, and that your information was gained from good and reliable independent and Democratic sources. A little further along you state that my supporters are not a very choice part of the community. Then your independent informants cannot be thoroughly reliable according to your views, can they?
I never at any time made the statement you mention to the effect that the bridge south of town should be assumed by the state; nor did I make any statement at any time that could be tortured into meaning this. I did say, and I repeat it here, that all bridges now built and maintained by the various townships in the county, should be assumed and maintained by the county. And all bridges hereafter to be built, costing to exceed two hundred dollars, should be built by the county and maintained the same as other bridges, by the county. You say there have been laws passed in our state legislature authorizing different counties in the state to assume the bridges therein when certain conditions have been complied with, and this law is in force in Cowley County today. Then why under the sun is the law not enforced, and thereby relieve the township from this burden which has been borne with patience so long.
You say further Mr. Schiffbauer’s election could have no influence whatever on the bridge question. Now I want to cite you to the laws of Kansas of 1883, to the laws passed by our state legislature and senate in relation to bridges. I refer you to house bill No. 205, page 90; senate bill No. 221, page 90; house bill No. 296, page 95; house bill No. 301, page 97; senate bill No. 264, page 99; house joint resolution No. 9, page 100; senate bill No. 28, page 104; senate bill No. 124, page 111; senate bill No. 69, page 114; and so on. You can find on pages 119, 131, 129, and 133. Now, why the necessity of these acts, if, as you say, our representative can have no influence; why did our representative two years ago pledge himself to secure a similar act to those cited to above; if he had, or could have nothing to do with bridges? He was and is an expounder of Coke, Blackstone, and constitutional laws and ought to know; was he the hypocrite you picture me to be? It does seem to me you judge me by the rest of your party.
About the time I came to your city, the bridge south of town was washed away by the freshet, and Creswell Township was bonded to her utmost limit, and the vexed question was how to replace that bridge. And I then said that in my opinion the general government should give us an appropriation sufficient to place a new bridge across there, and I believed they would do so if the matter was properly presented; and I still hold that opinion. And it is the duty of the best senator the United States ever had (?) to assist us in this matter, as he knows as well as anyone else, that this bridge is used fully as much for the benefit of the Indians and military departments as by the citizens of this state; and an appropriation of this kind would be quite as judiciously expended as the $20,000 to $50,000 expended on this same stream, in the shape of some cadet of the U. S. Engineer corps surveying and estimating the number and extent of the sand hills and snags between Wichita and Little Rock.
F. P. SCHIFFBAUER.
Arkansas City Republican, October 18, 1884.
Parties living east of the Walnut say that water has backed up to the bridge at Searing & Mead’s mill owing to the canal sand. We wonder what has become of our bridge men.
Arkansas City Republican, October 18, 1884.
Our south bridge, parties tell us, is sadly in want of repairs. The Indians claim they will not cross it unless it is kept in a better condition. Lafe Merritt inspected it for the agent at his town and will report its condition when he returns.
Arkansas City Republican, October 18, 1884.
The petitions of the several townships of Cowley County asking the county commissioners to submit the propositions to the legal voters of said county for the purchase of the bridges within the county at $5 per bridge was granted at their session of last week, and an election was called for on November 4, 1884. In the county there are five bridges to be purchased: one across the Walnut near Searing and Mead’s mill; one south and one west of Arkansas City spanning the Arkansas River; then, one across the Walnut in Pleasant Valley township. [CONFUSING! I COUNT ONLY FOUR MENTIONED ABOVE.]
The notice of election also calls for erection of two bridges, one upon the Arkansas in Beaver Township, and one to span the Walnut at Fairview.
A separate ballot box from the one used to deposit the votes for the national, state, and county candidates will be had for the votes on the bridge question. This proposition is one which all should stand united upon. It is not political; therefore, all should pull together. It is a subject of vast importance to each and every citizen of Cowley county. What enriches one township augments the remaining ones. Let us all put our shoulders to the wheel and on the first Tuesday in November vote for the purchase and erection of said bridges.
Arkansas City Republican, October 18, 1884.
Clippings from the Courier.
The county Commissioners have decided to purchase at a sum not to exceed five dollars all the main-stream bridges in the county, for which an election proclamation is published elsewhere. They will also span the Arkansas near Tannehill with a bridge.
Excerpt...
Arkansas City Traveler, Wednesday, October 22, 1884.
SCHIFFBAUER AS A LEGISLATOR.
Our worthy and intelligent mayor occupied two columns of the Republican last Saturday in answering our article of two weeks ago. His denials are accompanied with such reservations as to make them a tacit admission of the truth of our assertions, and to still more thoroughly convince us of his unfitness for the office to which he hopes to be elected. He starts out by disclaiming the assertion that the bridge south of town should be assumed by the state, and says he meant the county; then a little further on he explains that what he did say was that the general government “should appropriate a sufficient sum to place a new bridge across there, and I believe they would do so if the matter was properly presented, and I still hold that opinion.” This is all very pretty in theory, and was probably suggested to Frank because of his long experience in dabbling in government contracts; but even a man so thoroughly familiar with the liberality of the government as is Frank never heard of the United States making such an appropriation as he calls for. Nor do we believe he is foolish enough to believe in such a possibility himself. It is simply a very nice piece of bait to throw out in the hope that hungry and dissatisfied voters will catch at it.
Mr. Schiffbauer is not the first nor the only man who has advocated the county’s assuming our bridges, and in questioning our statement as to the law in regard to our bridges, he only displays more of that ignorance and stupidity which has thus far characterized his campaign. There is, and has been for years, a law authorizing Cowley County to assume the bridges of the county. Why isn’t it enforced? Because our county commissioners have always been instructed by the county attorney that this question must be decided by ballot, and that the bridges could not be accepted as a gift, but must be purchased, the county paying therefor a nominal sum. The question has never been submitted to the people for the simple reason that heretofore it has been impossible to carry it; but for your special edification, Frank, we will say that one week from next Tuesday, Cowley County votes on this question, thus relieving you of the responsibility of securing an appropriation from the general government.
Arkansas City Traveler, October 22, 1884.
Our south bridge is now fixed and in good repair, which will be welcome news to the many who travel over this thoroughfare. Moreover our trustee says it will be kept in good condition continually hereafter.
Arkansas City Republican, October 25, 1884.
We have learned that 4,000 feet of hard lumber has been laid on the south Arkansas bridge. The bridge is now in good condition.
Arkansas City Republican, November 8, 1884.
Creswell says unanimously for Cowley to buy the bridges.
Arkansas City Traveler, November 12, 1884.
Trustee Whitney informs us that the material for the bridge to be built over the Walnut River at Harmon’s ford is now on the road and the bridge builder is expected daily, when the work will be commenced and pushed to completion without delay.
Arkansas City Republican, November 15, 1884.
Another car load of bridge iron and timber for the Harmon’s Ford Bridge arrived the first of this week. The material is nearly all here and work will commence at once.
Arkansas City Republican, November 15, 1884.
Hip, Hurrah. Work commenced on the bridge at Harmon’s Ford yesterday noon and will be pushed as rapidly as possible.
Arkansas City Republican, November 15, 1884.
Work on the bridge across the Walnut at Harmon’s ford commenced yesterday. The remainder of the timber has been shipped and will be here shortly. The head bridge builder is here now.
Winfield Courier, November 13, 1884.
The Bridges.
The bridge questions voted on last week were nearly as uncertain as the New York returns. The result is: For the purchase of the Walnut River bridge south of Winfield, carried by 21 majority. For the purchase of the Walnut River bridge west of Winfield, carried by 22 majority. For the purchase of the Arkansas River bridge west of Arkansas City, lost by 2 majority. For the purchase of the bridge south of Arkansas City, lost by five majority. For the building of the iron bridge across the Arkansas River in Beaver Township, lost by 27 majority. For the building of the iron bridge across the Walnut River in Fairview Township, carried by 334 majority. This matter of the county purchasing the bridges already built, at $5.00 each, seems to be a mistake. The Statute provides that the county cannot at any time appropriate more than the original appropriation for repairing or maintaining a bridge. Thus, if the county buys these bridges at $5.00 each, it can never spend more than $5.00 each in keeping them up. The bridges that were defeated, with the exception of the Beaver bridge, are better off than those which carried. Arkansas City and Winfield both voted solid for the bridges.
Arkansas City Republican, November 15, 1884.
Winfield voted solidly for the purchase of her bridges and scratched Arkansas City’s. Unintentionally Winfield when she scratched us did us a favor. As it is now the Winfield bridges are on the county and only $5 can ever be appropriated for the maintenance of them. Our bridges remain on the township yet. If Winfield had acted squarely, and voted solidly as the Courier stated she did for the purchase of Cowley’s bridges, all our bridges would now be in the same fix as Winfield’s and only $5 could have ever been expended for the maintenance of Cresswell’s bridges in the future. He that scratches last scratches best and longest.
Arkansas City Republican, November 15, 1884.
Between 6 and 7 o’clock Tuesday evening while J. C. Coulter, of West Bolton Township, was crossing the west Arkansas bridge, with a traction-engine, a span of the bridge gave away, precipitating the engine and three men into the river. Mr. Coulter was pretty badly bruised about the neck and shoulders, Shannon Herrin had his hip injured, and Edward Klepzig his knee. Fortunately none were seriously hurt. Immediate steps were taken to remove the engine and repair the bridge. Mr. Coulter had purchased the engine of Mr. Herrin and was taking it home when the accident occurred. The engine was considerably damaged by the fall.
Arkansas City Traveler, November 19, 1884.
During the time the west bridge was down, the Arkansas was forced just below the dam.
Arkansas City Traveler, November 19, 1884.
The breaking of the West bridge by a steam engine last week showed its immense usefulness to Arkansas City. It was a matter of comment that it kept nearly one-half of our farmer friends from town and materially affected trade until it was repaired.
Arkansas City Traveler, November 19, 1884.
Work commenced on the bridge to be built across the Walnut at Harmon’s ford on last Friday.
Arkansas City Traveler, November 19, 1884.
The material is all on the ground for the new bridge at Harmon’s ford and work will be prosecuted rapidly.
Arkansas City Republican, November 22, 1884.
J. C. Coulter’s traction engine, which fell through the bridge, was removed from the Arkansas and the bridge repaired by last Saturday night.
Arkansas City Republican, November 22, 1884.
Work is progressing rapidly on the Harmon Ford Bridge. It will be completed in about ten days from today. This will be the most substantial bridge in the county.
Arkansas City Republican, November 22, 1884.
We are informed that we were too previous in accusing Winfield of scratching Arkansas City on the bridge question. The Courier was right for once and we gladly correct.
Arkansas City Traveler, December 3, 1884.
There was a rumor current in Winfield Tuesday that one of our bridges had broken down and killed two or three men. It was a mistake.
Arkansas City Traveler, December 3, 1884.
We now have a grocery and meat market near the west bridge.
Winfield Courier, December 4, 1884.
Shooting Scrape.
DIED. Last Saturday as Mr. David Hahn, of Vernon, was crossing the toll bridge at Oxford he got into an altercation with the gate-keeper, which resulted in the keeper shooting him through the breast, from the effects of which he died Monday. The shootist was arrested and is now confined in jail at Wellington. Mr. Hahn said that he had a row with the keeper about the toll and finally told him he would pay it, and while getting out his pocket book, the fellow shot him. The keeper says that Mr. Hahn came at him with a wagon rod and he told him to stand back; but he kept coming, so he shot. Mr. Hahn was one of the largest farmers on the Arkansas Valley and came here from Indiana some two or three years ago.
Arkansas City Traveler, December 10, 1884.
Our west bridge is in a deplorable condition, full of holes and breaks. It has been condemned.
Arkansas City Republican, December 13, 1884.
DIED. David Hahn, living near Oxford, was fatally shot last Saturday morning by Simeon Baughn, the tollgate-keeper. Mr. Hahn was on his way to Oxford, and arriving at the toll-bridge spanning the Arkansas, found the gate locked, and attempted to burst the lock. About this time Baughn arrived and in the war of words which followed, Hahn was cruelly shot by Baughn. Baughn gave himself up and is now in jail at Wellington.
Winfield Courier, December 18, 1884.
MARRIED. John J. Hahn and Emma L. Cromer were married at Oxford last week. John is a son of Mr. David Hahn, who was killed by the Oxford bridge keeper week before last.
Winfield Courier, December 18, 1884.
We are informed that Mr. Buffington, who owns the Pontoon bridge on the Arkansas near Oxford, will take it to or near Arkansas City.
Winfield Courier, December 18, 1884.
The new free bridge across the Arkansas River, at Oxford, was opened to public travel last week. It is pronounced a very fine and substantial structure.
Arkansas City Republican, December 27, 1884.
Work is progressing slowly on the bridge at Harmon’s Ford. The cold weather makes work almost impossible. At present teams are crossing on the ice.
Arkansas City Republican, December 27, 1884.
Shall Bridges Be County Property?
There seems to be a general desire to place the bridges in charge of the county. The expense of keeping them up falls heavily on the townships in which they are located, while the public at large do most of the traveling over them. We understand that petitions will be presented to the members of the legislature from this county asking that they try to secure legislation covering these points. Courier.
Arkansas City Traveler, December 31, 1884.
The new bridge across the Arkansas River at Oxford has been opened to the public, who can now cross free of charge. It is a fine bridge and an ornament to Sumner County.
Udall Sentinel.
Arkansas City Traveler, December 31, 1884.
Bridge Meeting.
At a meeting of the voters of Creswell Township, Monday, December 29, business pertaining to the township was transacted, after which the subject of maintaining certain bridges was brought up for discussion. We know that certain bridges have been built and maintained for the benefit and accommodation of other townships and corporations almost exclusively. Now the question is who must support these bridges. So far Creswell Township has been taxed to build and support said bridges, but the fixed determination at the present is to throw off this oppression. Not because we are opposed to internal improvements, or any legitimate expenditure of money whereby we may be benefitted to any reasonable extent.
Speeches were made by F. M. Vaughn, G. Kirkpatrick, R. L. Marshall, and A. B. Sankey. Mr. Kirkpatrick proposed to make said bridges self-supporting by making them toll bridges. Mr. Vaughn proposed to have the bridges vacated and closed, as they are the private property of the township. Others proposed different schemes. It was agreed by all, however, that the supporting of said bridges was an injustice and an imposition. It was thereupon
RESOLVED, (1) That the grievance be placed in the hands of a committee appointed by the chair. (2) That this committee be instructed to bring the matter before the county Commissioners, and to decide what steps should be taken toward righting the wrong. (3) That the Clerk be authorized to present a copy of these proceedings to the different papers of Arkansas City for publication. R. L. MARSHALL, President.
S. E. POLLOCK, Secretary.
1885
Arkansas City Traveler, January 21, 1885.
During the late high waters, Grouse Creek was past fording for nearly a week; obstructing the mails from the east and delaying freighters on their way to and from the Territory. It does seem there is enough travel on the roads east to justify a bridge over Grouse, and the TRAVELER would like to see one.
Arkansas City Traveler, January 21, 1885.
We are informed that the pontoon bridge across the Arkansas River at Oxford is for sale very cheap. Now, would it not be of advantage to our little city to buy the bridge and move it down the river till opposite here, for the accommodation of the people on the east side of the river? It would bring a large trade to this place that now goes to Arkansas City. We think money enough could soon be raised by subscription to buy it. Let us talk the matter up and see what can be done. Geuda Springs Herald.
If this bridge is for sale cheap, it would pay someone to put it on the Arkansas River at the mouth of Grouse as a toll bridge and accommodate the travel along the State Line.
Arkansas City Traveler, January 28, 1885.
The Walnut Bridge is now completed and is said to be one of the finest in the state. We will visit it next week, and describe it fully.
Arkansas City Traveler, January 28, 1885.
A man who was working on the Walnut bridge had a narrow escape Tuesday morning. He was working on the railing and, making a misstep, fell 17 feet onto the solid ice, happily lighting on his feet; otherwise, he would undoubtedly have been killed.
Arkansas City Traveler, January 28, 1885.
J. K. Lawyer, of Wichita, who is doing the work on the Walnut bridge, came down Friday last. He says his work will be completed this week.
Arkansas City Republican, January 31, 1885.
The recent bad weather has delayed the work on the bridge at Harmon’s Ford. Trustee Whitney informs us that should good weather prevail a few days, the bridge would soon be completed.
Arkansas City Republican, February 7, 1885.
The Harmon’s Ford Bridge is completed and is used to an advantage by the farmers coming to our city to do their trading.
Arkansas City Traveler, February 11, 1885.
Grouse Creek has been on a bender again. The mail was delayed here four or five days last week on account of high water, and the suggestion of the TRAVELER for the purchase of the Oxford pontoon bridge is more pertinent than ever.
Arkansas City Traveler, February 11, 1885.
The Cambridge News says T. O. Smith came very near drowning his team last week. His wagon was loaded with hay, and as he was crossing a stream it was swept down by the current about two rods, when he succeeded in cutting the horses loose and swimming ashore.
Arkansas City Traveler, February 11, 1885.
Dam Badly Broken.
Last Saturday morning it became known on the streets that the dam in the Arkansas River had given way before the crush of ice. We, in company with many interested persons, hurriedly made our way to the river. Here we found the damage much greater than was expected. The ice had by immense pressure, displaced the top of the dam and the consequent rush of the packed ice and long repressed floods, carried away about 150 feet of the dam and the same length of the bridge above it. This accident will compel the stoppage of the mills on the canal for three or four weeks, and the loss of employment to their many employees just when it is, perhaps, the most needed. The worst feature in the case, is, that all the farmers west of us will be compelled to go round by the South bridge, lengthening the distance by from two to four miles. This will cut us off from a great deal of trade we have been getting, which will now go to Geuda. As long as the high water lasts, there is little hope of being able to do anything, and we fear this will last for a month or so yet.
Arkansas City Republican, February 14, 1885.
Just after we went to press last week, word reached us that the dam across the Arkansas west of town had gone away. Also the bridge. It proved partly true. About 125 feet of the dam was carried away and about the same number of feet of the bridge was taken. The damage done to the dam cannot yet be estimated as the floating ice and high water will not permit a boat in its current. The water in the canal is so low that the flour mills have been stopped. Nothing can be done until the swollen waters subside and then quite a while will be consumed in repairing the break. The immense pressure of the ice against the bridge pilings caused them to give away and the dam, at the same time. This catastrophe will furnish several laborers employment for a time at good wages. “It’s an ill wind that blows no one any good.”
Arkansas City Traveler, February 18, 1885.
The immense crowd which was on our streets last Saturday evidence that Arkansas City has not lost any of her prestige as a business point. The crowd was certainly as large as ever was on our streets when there was no excitement or entertainment. And this was the case when the west bridge was down, which necessarily cut off many who would otherwise have been here.
Arkansas City Traveler, February 18, 1885.
The Ninnescah bridge, near Oxford, was somewhat injured by ice Saturday.
Arkansas City Republican, Saturday, February 21, 1885.
Senator Jennings has introduced at the senate a bill in regard to the building and maintenance of bridges. It contains 20 sections and is quite too lengthy for the REPUBLICAN to go into detail. Section 10 of the bill provides for a bridge fund and is as follows.
“The county commissioners of the several counties in this state are authorized to levy a tax annually on all taxable property of the respective counties of this state, not exceeding five mills on the dollar, for the purpose of providing a bridge fund, to be expended under the provisions of this act.”
Sections 12, 13, and 14 concern us more directly and are as follows.
SEC. 12. All bridges constructed under the provisions of this act, shall thereinafter be repaired and kept up jointly by the township, in which said bridge is located, and the county; the township bearing one-third and the county two-thirds of such expense.
SEC. 13. All bridges proposed to be built under this act, over any stream or other place requiring such bridge, and across the boundary line between two townships in the same county, the election for such bridge shall be called in each township at the same time and in the same manner as hereinbefore provided for holding the election in one township; and if a majority of the votes cast in each township shall be in favor of the proposition, then the board of county commissioners shall levy and collect from each of said townships one-sixth the cost of such bridge, which shall be expended as herein provided.
SEC. 14. The board of county commissioners of the counties of this state shall hereafter appropriate out of the bridge fund of their respective counties, money sufficient to pay two-thirds of the necessary repairs and expenses of keeping up any bridge or bridges already built by township or townships, or by the county, where the original cost exceeds $300; and such township or townships in which such bridge or bridges are located, shall pay one-third the expenses of the repairs and expenses out of the road and bridge or other tax fund of such township or townships.
This bill to us appears to be a good one, yet there may be some flaws in it. Anyway, it is head and shoulders above any law we have in regard to bridges.
Arkansas City Traveler, February 25, 1885.
County and Township Bridges.
We make the following extracts from the Senate Bill introduced by Senator Jennings. The bill makes provision for the defects in the present law and has the merit of exceeding practicability.
Be it enacted by the Legislature of the State of Kansas:
SECTION 1. Whenever the trustees of any township in any county of this state shall present to the board of county commissioners of his county a petition, signed by two-fifths of the resident taxpayers of each township, praying for the construction of a bridge within said township, at a point to be mentioned in said petition, the necessary cost of which will exceed five hundred dollars, the board of county commissioners of above named state shall inquire into the facts set forth in such petition, and if said board deem the building of said bridge of sufficient public necessity and utility, it shall determine upon a plan, the kind of materials to be used, and estimate the cost thereof.
SECTION 2. The said board of county commissioners, after determining the necessity and public utility of building a bridge under section 1 of this act, shall submit to the qualified electors of the township in which said bridge is proposed to be built, at a special election to be held for that purpose, a proposition as to whether said township shall pay one-third of the cost of building said bridge; which proposition shall state the precise point at which such proposed bridge is to be constructed, the kind of materials to be used, and the estimated cost of the same. At least twenty days’ notice of the time and place of holding said election, either by publication for three consecutive weeks in some newspaper of general circulation in said township, or by posting up printed notice thereof in not less than eight conspicuous places in said township.
SECTION 10. The county commissioners of the several counties in this state are authorized to levy a tax annually on all the taxable property of their respective counties, of not exceeding five mills on the dollar for the purpose of providing a bridge bond, to be under the provisions of this act.
SECTION 11. The board of county commissioners shall have the executive control of letting all contracts under the provisions of this act, and making payments therefor, and the county treasurer shall pay out no money out of this bridge fund to be expended under the provisions of this act, except upon a warrant signed by the chairman of such board and attested by the county clerk. Provided further, No money shall be paid to any person, company, or corporation contracting to build such bridge, until all the materials for such bridge are on the ground: And provided further, That not more than half the cost of building such bridge shall be paid until such bridge is completed and accepted by said board.
SECTION 12. All bridges constructed under the provisions of the act shall thereinafter be repaired and kept up jointly by the township in which said bridge is located, and the county; the township bearing one-third and the county two-thirds of such expense.
SECTION 13. All bridges proposed to be built under this act, over any stream or other place requiring such bridge, and across the boundary line between two townships in the same county, the election for such bridge shall be called in each township at the same time and in the same manner as hereinbefore provided for holding the election in one township; and if a majority of the votes cast in each township shall be in favor of the proposition, then the board of county commissioners shall levy and collect from each of said townships one-sixth the cost of such bridge, which shall be expended as herein provided.
SECTION 14. The board of county commissioners of the counties of this state shall hereafter appropriate out of the bridge fund of their respective counties, money sufficient to pay two-thirds of the necessary repairs and expenses of keeping up any bridge or bridges already built by township or townships, or by the county where the original cost exceeds $300; and such township or townships in which such bridge or bridges are located, shall pay one-third the expense of the repairs and expenses out of the road and bridge or other tax fund of such township or townships.
SECTION 16. Whenever the township shall declare on the records of that township that the building of a bridge is necessary at some point in their townships, and that the cost of the same will be less than five hundred dollars and more than one hundred dollars, then the township trustee shall immediately present a copy of the record of that action of such board to the board of county commissioners, and if said board deems the building of such bridge practicable and of sufficient public utility, and that it will cost less than $500 and more than $100, said commissioners may build the same as provided herein for the building of other bridges, without an election for that purpose being held in the township or townships where such bridge is located.
SECTION 17. All bridges in the counties in this state costing one hundred dollars or less shall be built and repaired exclusively by the township in which they may be situated.
SECTION 19. This act shall take effect and be in force from and after its publication in the statute book.
Arkansas City Traveler, February 25, 1885.
In view of the fact that the west bridge is down and that this in consequence cuts off a large amount of trade from our city, it is pertinent to ask what is to be done. It is not likely that the township will be in any hurry to rebuild it. It will not benefit the township, so much as it will the city. For this reason we think the township will hardly be very energetic in the matter. As to Bolton’s cooperation, we think there is little hope judging from the past. The rebuilding of the bridge then falls on to the city, unjustly but necessarily. The proposition by Major Sleeth presents the quickest solution of this question. It is in effect this: The businessmen of Arkansas City are the ones to be most directly benefitted. Let them contribute the amount necessary—not more than $100 or $500. This amount would, when divided proportionally, amount to $25 each. This is the quickest solution. A more just one would be for the businessmen to contribute half the amount necessary, and the city to furnish the other half; for what benefits one class, also helps the city. Of the amount to be given by the City, the businessmen will, of course, pay a large proportion, as they pay more taxes a great deal than other citizens. This will in the end amount to the businessmen paying three fourths, or, at least three fifths, of the amount—a very fair proposition. Our city cannot afford to wait on the dilatory action of the township. Every day the bridge is down means dollars out of the pockets of our businessmen, consequently so much from the prosperity of the City. If our businessmen and citizens take a proper view of the matter, the west bridge will soon be ready for crossing.
Arkansas City Republican, Saturday, March 7, 1885.
How to repair the bridge across the Arkansas west of town is agitating our citizens. The township refuses to repair, and the city has no right to appropriate any money for that purpose. Every day that bridge is down, our businessmen lose nearly all of that trade out west. Something ought to be done to have it repaired.
Arkansas City Traveler, March 11, 1885.
Crowds flocked to the soldiers’ camp Sunday, and to the new iron bridge on the Walnut. Every hour of the beautiful day was exhausted by our citizens, riding or walking.
Arkansas City Republican, March 14, 1885.
J. S. Alter, while hauling some cane seed across the Arkansas bridge Monday, came near having a serious accident. Mr. Alter drives a handsome team and one of his horses stepped his foot in a hole. Fortunately, the horse was gentle and escaped uninjured. J. M. Moore was immediately sent down by the mayor to make repairs on the bridge. He laid over 1500 feet of hard lumber in re-covering the floor.
Arkansas City Republican, March 14, 1885.
The west bridge across the Arkansas River is to be repaired. The township refused to aid in the repairing, so a petition was circulated among our citizens asking for help. Also, one in West Bolton Township. All responded as liberally as they could. Arkansas City realizes how much trade she loses by not having the bridge up, and West Bolton learns she is cut off from the best trading point in Southwestern Kansas. Several hundred dollars have already been raised. We are informed that some $500 is needed to put the bridge in proper condition.
Arkansas City Republican, March 21, 1885.
Nearly $500 have been subscribed to repair the west Arkansas River bridge. Even after Arkansas City has put the bridge in proper shape, who is going to keep it in repair? The townships refuse to aid any; the city, county, and state have no law by which they can aid. We need a bridge law of some kind very badly.
Arkansas City Republican, Saturday, April 18, 1885.
Gardner Mott agrees to repair the west bridge across the Arkansas satisfactorily for $700. J. W. Hutchison and others are rustling around this week hunting subscriptions.
Arkansas City Traveler, May 20, 1885.
In the Council meeting on Monday evening some bills were presented by the road commissioner for repairs on the south canal bridge. A difficulty was encountered in acting upon them. The bridge is outside of the city limits, and the cost of repairing is not fairly chargeable upon city taxpayers. Creswell Township is properly chargeable with the cost of repairing the bridge, but our neighbors seem negligent in their duty. Our merchants suffer in their trade if the approaches to the city are closed, and hence the necessity of keeping them in order. The bills were trifling, amounting to but $11.00 for a few planks and the labor of setting them, but the question of legality was involved; hence they were referred to the finance committee.
Arkansas City Traveler, May 20, 1885.
A MOIST TIME.
Drouthy Kansas Tries Its Head At A Deluge.
We have delayed writing this weather article till the last hour, before going to press, in the hope that Pluvius would step aside and give old Sol a chance to right things. But the clouds continue to “drop fatness down,” until we are all surfeited with such unsparing beauty and now pray to be put upon leaner diet. The long continuance of wet weather has saturated the earth and filled every stream to repletion. On Sunday a serious and rapid rise in the Arkansas was noticed, and this arrested the outflow of the Walnut, causing that stream to overflow its banks. In the afternoon crowds were attracted thither; and as the water crept along the road leading to the Harmon bridge, and overflowed the fields on each side, vehicles were brought into requisition, and curious spectators were forced across. The river went bounding by, carrying float and driftwood on its turbid surface and steadily increasing in volume.
About three p.m., the water had reached to within four feet of the bridge and was spreading out on both sides rapidly. A settler living in a cabin near the bridge, finding the swelling tide approaching his door, loaded up his household goods in a hurry and took up a drier station near the railroad track.
The canal also took on the character of a torrent and stormed through the raceway like a young Niagara. Quite a crowd of our citizens gathered in the vicinity of the mills, where they commanded a view of the swollen stream spread out like a second Mississippi. Now and then a carcass would be carried along in the flood; and it was reported that a team of horses entangled in their harness floated by. At McDowell Bro.’s slaughter-house, the flood encroached so closely on their grounds that one hog was washed away; and to save further loss, their fine herd of 150 porkers and a number of steers in the pen were driven to another enclosure.
On Monday the Walnut made another rise, reaching almost to the railroad depot, and its stormy torrent has since been fed by the heavy showers that have fallen at intervals. No such flood has visited this region since 1875, and there is no doubt that serious damage will result.
In other parts of the state the washing away of bridges and other damage are reported. A bridge went out between Burden and New Salem, and two spans of the Southern Kansas bridge at Grenola were washed away. In Winfield the water backed up to the courthouse, trains were delayed, and construction trains put out for repairs. Yesterday afternoon the streams at this point were sinking, and our citizens are comforting themselves with the belief that the worst is over.
Arkansas City Traveler, June 10, 1885.
The west bridge across the Arkansas, from which two spans were washed away during the late rain storm, has been repaired, and on Monday was reopened to traffic. The cost of the repairs was $750, the city council appropriating $60 towards this amount, the remainder being raised by subscription among our businessmen.
Arkansas City Traveler, June 10, 1885.
THE APPROACHES TO THE CITY.
Injuries Inflicted on Our Merchants by Bad Roads and Broken Bridges.
We want a law of the Legislature passed, requiring county commissioners to build necessary bridges and keep them in repair, and also to maintain the roads in proper condition for the passage of teams. As the case now stands, there is a dead lock in keeping the approaches to Arkansas City open. Two spans of the west bridge crossing the Arkansas were swept away during the freshet, shutting off that avenue to the outlying country. On that road leading to the territory, over which there is constant and heavy traffic, a quagmire is encountered, through which teams flounder and in which loaded wagons bog, and from which no amount of lashing or profanity will extricate them.
Our city officials say that after heavy rains and at the opening of spring, when the frost leaves the ground, every approach to the city is well nigh impassable, and the loss to our merchants (because of this impediment to travel) foots up to many thousands of dollars during the year.
The repair of roads and bridges lying outside the city limits, over which general traffic passes, lies with the county; and the county commissioners, who, from any feeling of jealousy or other selfish cause, neglect to perform this important duty, are false to the trust reposed to them by the people, and this neglect becomes oppressive and unjust.
Persons who suffer by bad roads and broken bridges appeal to our city council for redress of their grievances. They set forth the injury they sustain, and estimate the amount of money necessary to remove the evil. Our city fathers are fully conscious of the fact that the city suffers equally with these individual petitioners, in having the highways impeded, but they have no authority to devote the city funds to any such use, and hence they are powerless to act. We mentioned in our report of the council proceedings last week the application of a resident of Bolton Township (Isaac Adams), for the use of four wagons and teams for five days, to aid him in draining and filling up that breeding place of malaria, the slough on this side of the south bridge crossing the Arkansas. He said he had timber in his possession belonging to the township which he could use in building a flume, but teams were required to procure brush, and haul earth to fill up the festering hole. The sum of $50 would pay for the work needed, but there was no authority vested in that body to vote the money. As an expedient the street commissioner was instructed to visit the merchants and raise the necessary amount of road tax from them, it being supposed they would countenance the irregularity as the object in view was the furtherance of their own interest. This loose-jointed way of whipping the devil around the stump is forced upon our citizens because of the refusal of the county commissioners to perform their duty, and this is why we say a state law should be passed requiring such bodies to keep bridges and roads in repair, and then if they neglect them, there is a chance to get after them with a mandamus.
Excerpt...
Arkansas City Traveler, June 10, 1885.
Council Meeting.
The City Council met in adjourned meeting on Monday evening, the mayor and Councilmen Thompson, Dean, Dunn, Hight, and Bailey present.
The following bill was acted on: A. V. Alexander & Co., lumber for south bridge, $15.15, to be paid by Bolton Township.
Arkansas City Republican, Saturday, June 13, 1885.
An Unjust Criticism.
EDITOR OF THE REPUBLICAN: SIR: I desire to call the attention of the public to the following quotations from the “Traveler” of the 16th.
“The repair of roads and bridges lying outside the city limits, over which general traffic passes, lies with the county; and the county commissioners, who, from any feeling of jealousy or other selfish cause, neglect to perform this important duty, are false to the trust reposed to them by the people, and this neglect becomes oppressive and unjust.”
And again from the same article: “This loose-jointed way of whipping the devil around the stump is forced upon our citizens because of the refusal of the county commissioners to perform their duty, and this is why we say a state law should be passed requiring such bodies to keep bridges and roads in repair, and then if they neglect, there is a chance to get after them with a mandamus.”
I now publish from statutes of 1885.
“SECTION 1. The township trustee, clerk, and treasurer of each municipal township in the state shall constitute a board of commissioners of highways and township auditing board for their respective townships.
“SECTION 5, same chapter. The said board shall have charge of the roads and bridges of their respective townships, and it shall be their duty to keep the same in repair, and to improve them as far as practicable. Whenever the available means at their disposal will permit, they shall construct permanent roads beginning where most needed.”
I have only this to say, that ignorance is no excuse for an editor in criticism of public officers when the means of knowledge are easy of access, and further, that public officers have sufficient to answer for in proper criticism for errors of judgment in matters for which they are responsible, without unjust criticism in regard to matters entirely out of their control.
A. WALTON.
Arkansas City Republican, June 13, 1885.
At one o’clock last Saturday the west bridge across the Arkansas was completed. Seven new spans were put in. The cost of the repairing was $750. The breakage was caused by the ice washing down the river last winter.
Arkansas City Republican, Saturday, June 20, 1885.
The Globe-Democrat describes a steamboat intended for Kansas waters.
“Wednesday morning a small towboat, intended for the upper waters of the Arkansas River, left this port for her destination, Arkansas City, Kansas. The distance she will have to travel before arriving there is over 1,400 miles. The boat was built at Carondelet, by Allen & Blaisdell, is 75 feet long, 15 feet beam, and 3 feet hold. The hull is built entirely of the best boiler steel, is provided with engines of the stern-wheel type, 8 inches diameter by 42 inches stroke, with boiler of fifty horse power. She draws only twelve inches of water and is destined to go under a bridge with only twelve feet clearance. Attempts have been made heretofore to navigate the shallow waters of the upper rivers and smaller streams, but this is the first boat built, with abundant capital at hand, to develop the navigation in a proper manner.”
Arkansas City Republican, June 27, 1885.
A bridge across Grouse Creek is still being discussed. A portion of the township wants the bridge in the southern part and a good many desire it to be located at Gilstrap’s Ford. We are informed that Spring Creek Township says it will give $1,000 towards building a bridge at Estus’ Ford. The township, it is claimed, is unable to build two bridges. Estus’ Ford is between the points mentioned above; and as Silverdale is not likely to come to an agreement as to where the bridge will be, we will suggest that it be put at Estus’ Ford and accept Spring Creek’s proffered aid.
Arkansas City Republican, July 4, 1885.
Estus Ford is a good place to locate the Grouse Creek bridge.
Arkansas City Republican, July 4, 1885.
Ike Harkleroad was in again from Silverdale. He is still working on the Grouse Creek bridge question. He informs us that about all have concluded that Silverdale Township was not able to build two bridges and now the location is the bone of contention. If the bridge is built at Estus Ford, Spring Creek Township will aid. This place is between the Gilstrap Ford and where the southern portion of the township desired the bridge located. From what we can learn, a bridge at Estus Ford on Grouse Creek would be of the most benefit to the greater number.
Arkansas City Republican, Saturday, July 11, 1885.
THE KANSAS MILLERS.
Anchors at Harmon’s Ford Bridge, July 8, 1885, at 5 p.m.
Wednesday afternoon Allen Ayers spread the glad tidings to the effect that the steamer had arrived. For a time it was hardly credited, but soon wagon loads of people were seen going to Harmon’s Ford. On arriving there we saw the long looked for steamer, the “Kansas Millers.” Capt. Moorhead, Fred Barnett, and “Robinson Crusoe” were there. The steamer left St. Louis June 13 and made good time when running a safe voyage, and surpassing the most sanguine expectations of Capt. Moorhead. She would have been here July 4, according to promise, but the drift wood and high water at Tulsa would not permit the steamer to go under the bridge. The railroad company are building a higher bridge, which is nearly completed.
The boat is a novel one indeed, and has to be seen to be appreciated. On several other occasions the REPUBLICAN has given a description of the steamer and it is as we have stated heretofore. In traveling, the steamer averages about seven miles per hour on the Arkansas. It has been practically demonstrated that small boats could run on the river to this point. We will now have a southern outlet. Barges will be built and the steamer will soon be towing great cargoes of flour down to the “tooth-pick.”
For a time the steamer will be used as an excursion boat until the steel barges are built. Fred Barrett will be in command and Capt. Barnes will be the pilot.
All the way up the river, the “Kansas Millers” made the best time of any craft. Sand bars were no hindrance. Capt. Moorhead tells us that any bar he ran onto, he either was able to go across or back off. It was impossible to stick the steel bottomed steamer. He was 20 days in traveling 1,791 miles, the distance by river from St. Louis to Arkansas City.
Arkansas City Republican, Saturday, July 11, 1885.
J. H. Gilstrap was over from Silverdale Tuesday. He wants two bridges built across Grouse Creek: one in the upper part and another in the lower part of the township. He says they are plenty able to vote the bonds for the bridges.
Arkansas City Republican, July 18, 1885.
The grove along the banks of the Walnut River below the Harmon Bridge landing would, if properly cleaned up, afford an elegant park for picnic and excursion gatherings. At the landing, the “Kansas Millers” would be ready to take the picnic parties down the river.
Excerpt...
Arkansas City Republican, Saturday, July 18, 1885.
Council Proceedings.
Council met in adjourned session Monday evening with Mayor Schiffbauer, Councilmen Davis, Dunn, Dean, Thompson, and Hight present; Hill and Bailey absent.
Bill of Gardener Mott of $40.55 for lumber west bridge, allowed.
Arkansas City Republican, Saturday, July 25, 1885.
Answer to T. D. Ross.
ED. REPUBLICAN: In an article written by T. D. Ross, I will say he proves himself to be a terrible ignoramus or doesn’t try to inform himself when he says our city dads allowed 29 days work in June when the bid says May, and June also. When he says I hire help on the street, if he has any common sense, he knows that I have not hired a day’s work done this spring. Now, Mr. Ross, you are mad because the street commissioner would not let you put your rotten manure in that fill at west canal bridge to pay your occupation tax and beat the city. Oh, you are a nice man to holler reform. When the street commissioner came in your ward, you and yours were the last men to come out and work or pay, which you have not done yet. You may be an honest man, but things don’t look that way to a man up a tree.
J. M. MOORE, Street Commissioner.
Arkansas City Traveler, July 29, 1885.
Mr. Bonsall has left with us some fine photographic views of the Hasie and Commercial block and of the raging Arkansas in the neighborhood of the west bridge at the time of the recent flood.
Arkansas City Republican, August 1, 1885.
Judge Bonsall presents the REPUBLICAN with two splendid views this week. One was taken at the west bridge at the time the Arkansas was on such a high, and the other is of the Hasie and Commercial blocks.
Arkansas City Republican, August 1, 1885.
The pupils of the Christian Sunday school are holding a picnic today in the grove at Harmon’s Bridge Landing.
Excerpts...
[EXCURSION DAY.]
Arkansas City Republican, Saturday, August 8, 1885.
Thursday was excursion day. At about 10 o’clock a.m., the train arrived from Wichita with four passenger coaches and a mail car, loaded to their utmost capacity with some 400 excursionists. A large crowd of our citizens were down at the depot to meet the visitors, but the train pulled on down to the road leading to Harmon’s Bridge.
A large body of the people went to the beautiful grove adjoining the steamboat landing, while a still greater portion came up to the city to enjoy a first-class meal at our hotels. After dinner a goodly number went down to the river to enjoy a ride on the steamer, which made frequent trips up and down the Walnut. The Wichita Cornet band was in attendance and enlivened the occasion with some choice music.
Arkansas City Republican, Saturday, August 15, 1885.
The Traveler appears to be fond of finding fault with Amos Walton. A short time ago it gave him a half-column notice in regard to his duties as a commissioner in attending to the repairing of roads, bridges, etc., severely condemning him. After Mr. Walton had informed the editor of the Traveler through the REPUBLICAN, that the township trustees attended to such matters, he came to Mr. Walton and apologized; but did not make any correction in the paper, which is due any misrepresented citizen.
The Traveler, in regard to the Grant memorial exercises, says: “Comrade Amos Walton delivered the eulogy in behalf of the post, but as he appeared to address his remarks to the opposite wing of the stage, they were unfortunately lost to the audience. Those on the stage who caught his address say it was able, touching, and appropriate.”
A representative of the REPUBLICAN was sitting in the gallery at the time Mr. Walton made his address, and with the exception of the first few sentences, he heard and appreciated the address. ‘Tis true Mr. Walton only partly faced the audience, but we must remember that his address was to his comrades. We fail to see the cause of the Traveler’s captiousness.
Arkansas City Republican, August 29, 1885.
Eight lives have been lost in the Walnut during the past month owing to the failure to build the bridge at the Dunkard Mills that the county voted should be built there. Eight lives have been placed in the scale against a $6,000 bridge and still their value is too light to pull up the bridge and have it put in place where it is so much needed. When the necessary number of human lives have been sacrificed on the altar of official slothfulness and indifference, then and not till then will the demands of an afflicted people be recognized and allowed. Udall Sentinel.
Arkansas City Traveler, September 2, 1885.
A meeting of our citizens will be held in Meigs & Nelson’s real estate office this (Wednesday) evening, to take steps to put the west bridge into permanent repair. A full attendance is requested.
Arkansas City Republican, Saturday, September 5, 1885.
Bridge Meeting.
A meeting was held in the office of Meigs & Nelson to take into consideration the condition of the bridge west of town. Amos Walton stated the bridge was almost impassable in its present condition and that the Chicago Lumber Company would furnish 2-inch oak plank delivered at depot for $35. Judge Kreamer was appointed chairman and I. H. Bonsall secretary. On motion, offered by H. O. Meigs, it was resolved that it was the sense of the meeting to raise $700 to put the said bridge in good and safe condition. On motion a committee appointed was to circulate a subscription paper to raise that sum with authority to see that the money was properly expended in purchasing the lumber and repairing the bridge. H. O. Meigs, John Kroenert, and Amos Walton were appointed, Mr. Walton agreeing to look after the business in Bolton Township. A motion was made that the committee see if the city council would not donate something to help repair the bridge and was carried. On motion the meeting adjourned to meet at Meigs & Nelson’s office next Wednesday evening, Sept. 9th, 1885, at which the committee is to report what progress it has made. Mr. Walton was instructed as one of said committee to keep the bridges in repairs until lumber arrives to put in an entire new floor, and he was empowered to purchase lumber for temporary repairs. W. D. KREAMER, Chairman.
I. H. BONSALL, Secretary.
Arkansas City Republican, September 5, 1885.
S. E. Maxwell Takes a Tumble.
Wednesday S. E. Maxwell started to cross the south Arkansas River bridge. Just as he got up far enough upon the approach within a few feet of the flooring, he saw another team about middle way of the bridge coming across. Mr. Maxwell attempted to back his team far enough down the approach to allow the other one to pass. They became frightened and as the approach is very narrow, backed over the edge into the river. The buggy was upset and broken, besides the team being injured pretty badly by falling over the barb wire fence running alongside the approach. Mr. Maxwell was uninjured. He gathered up the remains of the wreck, removed his team from the sand bar off the “Rackensack,” and returned home. People and teams will keep going over this approach until someone will have to pay an injured party a big sum of money for damages. This makes about the fourth person in the last 12 months.
Excerpts...
Arkansas City Traveler, September 9, 1885.
COUNCIL MEETING.
Our City Fathers Have a Rocking Time Together.
The meeting of the city council, on Monday evening, was a lively one, and the session lasted four hours. The mayor re-appointed the committees in order to assign Mr. A. D. Prescott, the new third ward member.
A committee consisting of ex-Police Judge Kreamer, Amos Walton, N. T. Snyder, and Meigs, applied for assistance in the work of laying an oak flooring on the west bridge. Its present insecurity kept trade away from the city, and a pine floor was continually wearing into holes. At a meeting of citizens held in Meigs & Nelson’s office on Saturday evening, it was computed that an oak floor would cost $700, and the above named committee was appointed to collect the amount by enlisting subscriptions from our businessmen. About $300 had been subscribed; but all referred the committee to the city council for aid.
Mr. Dunn thought the expenditure of such a sum on a bridge that was likely to be carried away next winter, injudicious. The piling was loose and the whole structure in an insecure condition. He would rather see money spent in permanent improvement.
The mayor said the council had no shadow of authority to devote the public money to any such purpose. If the gentlemen chose to assume the responsibility, well enough. The council had voted $65 to the repair of the bridge on a similar occasion, and it could exercise a similar discretion again. He was satisfied that taxpayers would raise an objection.
Mr. Dean said the repair of the west bridge was more essential to our businessmen than mending the city streets. A large amount of trade was lost to our city because of its dangerous condition, and money voted by the council to put it in fit condition for travel would certainly be approved.
Mayor Schiffbauer remarked that the people of Arkansas City would soon find themselves without bridges, and they wanted stirring up to a knowledge of this fact. There is no law in the state to define the duty of county or township in the matter. Last year Senator Jennings introduced a bill in the legislature, requiring county commissioners to appropriate money towards building necessary bridges, and if the cost was over a certain amount to bill them entire. But the measure did not pass. Now that our city is set apart from the township, the council is without authority to devote money to such a purpose, the township won’t do it, and the county cannot. There is thus no way on God’s earth to build necessary bridges, or keep old ones in repair.
Excerpt...
Arkansas City Republican, Saturday, September 12, 1885.
Council Proceedings.
The city council met in regular session Monday evening with Mayor Schiffbauer, Councilmen Prescott, Davis, Hight, Dean, and Dunn present, and Hill and Bailey absent.
A committee, consisting of Messrs. Meigs and Kreamer, asked that an appropriation be made to repair the west bridge, which was refused on the ground that the city had no authority.
Arkansas City Traveler, Wednesday, September 16, 1885.
FROM OUR EXCHANGES.
Oxford Register: If nothing more happens to prevent work, the entire force will commence on the Arkansas bridge at this point the first of next week. The reason they did not commence sooner was on account of their inability in getting material here. One load of piling came two weeks ago; one load of timber came yesterday, with a report of two more loads on the road. Ed. Reams has been here several days, and the whole force will be on hand by Monday ready to go to work.
Excerpts...
Arkansas City Traveler, September 23, 1885.
City Council.
A regular meeting of the city council was held on Monday evening, Councilmen Bailey and Hill absent.
A. A. Newman asked that they annex the portion of land between the city and the west bridge to bring that structure within the corporate limits and give the council power to keep it in repair. Referred to committee on streets and alleys.
Arkansas City Traveler, September 23, 1885.
The West Bridge.
Some time ago a meeting was held in Meigs & Nelson’s office to devise means for planking the West bridge with oak lumber. The pine flooring laid down along that shaky piece of river architecture wears into holes a few days after the spikes are driven, and such inadequate material is a constant bill of expense. The cost of the oak flooring was figured up at $700, and a committee appointed to raise the wind. Several of our merchants were called on, who subscribed $25 or $50, as they felt able; but such a method of keeping the approaches to our city open was felt to be burdensome and inequitable, and the committee before half the necessary money was raised, was referred to the city council for aid. But an appeal made to that body was an idle expenditure of effort. The mayor informed his applicants that the council had no authority to expend any portion of the city revenue in a bridge lying outside of the corporate limits, and the citizens of West Bolton did not feel themselves called on to bear the expense. It was true the city council, on previous occasions, had devoted public money to a similar use, but they had escaped censure by the acquiescence of taxpayers. There was no money at that time in the city treasury to supply to the purpose then in hand, and either the sum necessary must be raised by voluntary contribution, or the bridge must go unrepaired.
It has gone unrepaired to this day, and how much is lost to our merchants in the way of trade diverted, it would be hard to compute.
Yesterday J. D. Eckles attempted to cross the bridge with a light vehicle, having a lady for his companion; he saw the floor was full of holes, but hoped by careful driving to escape accident. The animals picked their way along till half over the bridge, when the hind leg of one went through. This is a wretched misadventure to a man with a day’s journey before him. Mr. Eckles helped his horse out of the hole, and led the team over the rest of the bridge. The animal’s leg was grazed and torn some, but he was not rendered worthless for life, as there was great danger of his being. This bridge question is a perplexing enigma, and the man has not yet been found in our community who can solve it.
Excerpts...
Arkansas City Republican, Saturday, September 26, 1885.
Council Proceedings.
The city council convened in regular session last Monday with the following members present: Mayor Schiffbauer and Councilmen Prescott, Davis, Dean, Thompson, and Hight.
The allowance of bills occupied the attention of the August body first and the following action was taken on those coming up.
Chicago Lumber Co., lumber for canal bridge, $2.83; allowed.
The request of A. A. Newman and others to annex a certain portion of land belonging to the water power company to the city in order that the west Arkansas River Bridge might be in the city limits, was by motion referred to the street and alley committee.
Excerpts...
Arkansas City Traveler, October 7, 1885.
Council Proceedings.
The city council met in regular session on Monday evening, at 7:30 o’clock; Councilman Thompson presiding, Mayor Schiffbauer being detained at home owing to the sickness of his wife. All the members were present except Bailey and Hill.
Mr. Dunn, on behalf of the street committee, said the proposition to annex that portion of land between the city and the west bridge in order to bring that structure within the city limits, had been referred to the wrong committee. His committee was not ready to report on the subject.
Excerpt...
Arkansas City Republican, October 17, 1885.
From Another Correspondent.
Who has charge of the west bridge? That fellow with seven heads and ten horns should have it for kindling wood.
Excerpt...
Arkansas City Traveler, October 21, 1885.
Council Proceedings.
The City Council met in regular session on Monday evening, all the members present, acting Mayor Thompson in the chair.
Mr. Thompson called the attention of the council to the condition of the bridge across the canal. It was now impassable for teams, and the canal company held themselves under no obligation to repair it. It was necessary for the council to take action, or approach to the city by that thoroughfare would be cut off. He mentioned the case of a horse having died this week through injuries sustained from falling through the bridge. The road commissioner was instructed to make the necessary repairs.
Excerpts...
Arkansas City Republican, Saturday, October 24, 1885.
Council Proceedings.
The council met in regular session Monday evening. Members present were councilmen Thompson, Dunn, Dean, Hill, Hight, Bailey, and Prescott. C. G. Thompson, acting mayor, presided.
It was moved and carried that the city repair the south canal bridge.
Arkansas City Republican, October 24, 1885.
T. McDonald, while driving across the south canal bridge, about two weeks ago with his team, had one of the animals step its hind leg into a hole in the flooring. The animal fell and sustained injuries from which it died last Friday. Mr. McDonald valued the horse at $125 and is considerably inconvenienced by the accident. Something should be done with these canal bridges. Let them either be made safe or removed entirely.
Arkansas City Republican, Saturday, October 31, 1885.
The Citizen’s Executive Committee was called together yesterday and met in Judge Pyburn’s office for the purpose of taking steps to plank the west bridge over the Arkansas. A. A. Newman, Maj. Sleeth, and T. H. McLaughlin were appointed as a committee to solicit aid, and were instructed to purchase lumber and repair the bridge. Our friends west of the city will in a few days be able to communicate again with us over a new bridge.
Arkansas City Traveler, November 4, 1885.
On Friday as a man, whose name we have not learned, was returning from the territory with a load of wood, while descending the hill on the other side of the Arkansas River Bridge, his loaded gun fell to the ground, and exploding, the charge splintered the hind leg of one of his mules. The animal had to be killed to relieve it from its suffering.
Arkansas City Traveler, November 4, 1885.
The Caldwell Journal editor shows a level head. He says: “The money necessary to buy the Wellington fair grounds and pay the debts hanging over it would build five or six good bridges in the county. Let us not go into the show business as a county until we have plenty of bridges over which to pass to the county seat.”
Arkansas City Traveler, Wednesday, November 11, 1885.
Oxford Register: By urgent solicitation of some of Oxford’s leading citizens, the county commissioners appropriated $500 more for the Arkansas bridge last week, and for this amount Mr. Reams has agreed to extend the bridge ninety feet longer, thus taking it clear to the east bank.
Arkansas City Republican, November 14, 1885.
The soldiers in crossing the south canal bridge on their way to Chilocco broke it almost down. It has since been repaired by the city.
Arkansas City Republican, November 14, 1885.
A team belonging to McDowell Bros., went through the south canal bridge Thursday. One animal went entirely through the flooring into the canal. It was a fall of about 15 feet, but the water saved it from being injured, except slightly. Fortunately, the team was gentle, and in about two hours of hard unceasing labor, it was extricated and put on solid footing.
Arkansas City Traveler, November 18, 1885.
As the McDowell Bros.’ wagon was returning to town from their slaughter house last Thursday, in crossing the canal bridge, one of the horses dropped through a small sized hole and hung suspended by the harness. The animal was unhitched and he dropped into the water, whence he was rescued after a good ducking.
Excerpt...
Arkansas City Republican, Saturday, November 21, 1885.
Bolton Items.
Our trustee has repaired the approach to the north end of the river bridge, which place had been a terror for some time. Oak planks have been placed on it instead of the old pine ones.
Should the Territory be opened for settlement, an iron bridge would be necessary instead of the present wooden bridge south of our city. A toll bridge, too, would seem in our judgment, to be the next best thing.
Arkansas City Republican, December 5, 1885.
Since its organization, the board of trade has taken upon itself the duty of flooring the west Arkansas River bridge. Last week the lumber was sent for. This week one car-load arrived and another is expected daily. About half of the bridge flooring has been laid. The board of trade is an excellent institution to do good for a town.
Arkansas City Republican, December 19, 1885.
The west bridge across the Arkansas has been entirely floored.
Arkansas City Republican, December 19, 1885.
Whenever a bonus is to be raised to secure an enterprise in Arkansas City, when there is a fund to be secured for the planking of our numerous bridges, to whom is the paper presented for subscription or donation? The REPUBLICAN answers, “The merchants.” No auction firm ever donated a cent for the up-building of Arkansas City. All that have come to this city have paid a smaller sum of money as occupation tax than any dry goods firm in the city, and yet the Traveler says this is only an unavoidable incident to trade. Will our merchants support a paper that strives to up-build foreign bankrupt auction firms to their detriment when they are the cause of its existence? We think not.
Arkansas City Republican, December 19, 1885.
Winfield had a big blow out last Friday night a week, and succeeded in raising $350 less toward building a railroad than we raised to plank a bridge, and it wasn’t a good day to plank bridges either.
Excerpts...
Arkansas City Traveler, December 23, 1885.
CITY COUNCIL PROCEEDINGS.
A petition numerously signed was next read asking that a substantial bridge be built over the Water Power Co.’s canal on the grade made necessary by the railroad track on Central Avenue; also to have the railroad company grade that avenue so as to make a convenient and safe crossing over their track.
Mr. Hill being called on to express his views said the bridge asked for ought to be 36 feet wide and the road through the swamp should have a width of 40 feet. A large amount of material would be needed to fill in, and he didn’t know where it was to be obtained; certainly not within a reasonable distance. He would have a wide avenue opened through the swamp, and a sluice hole made to let the water off. It was necessary the swamp should be removed. The city is growing; and here is a fever hole diffusing infection. The level of the Arkansas River is seven feet lower, and the swamp could be drained into the river by means of a ditch.
Mr. Prescott. “What would be the cost of such a ditch?”
Mr. Hill. “The cost would not exceed $250.”
After an informal debate, the petition was referred to the committee on streets and alleys.
Mr. Hight said the people on Central Avenue want cross walks. The council was familiar with the bad condition of the road there, and the crossings asked for were needed. Labor and material are cheap now, and the work could never be done more advantageously. He moved that four crossings be put in.
Mr. Bailey. “What is the matter with Fourth Avenue? Why can’t the people there have crossings?”
Mr. Prescott said a number of property owners living on Eighth Avenue were willing to lay sidewalks in front of their lots, but they first desired to have a grade established.
Mr. Dean remarked that every time a survey was made, a different level was reached. The present county surveyor might establish one grade, but his successor would give a different one. The matter went over without motion.
Excerpts...
Arkansas City Republican, December 26, 1885.
Council Proceedings.
The council convened in regular session last Monday evening. All members were present except Capt. C. G. Thompson.
A petition of certain residents to have a bridge placed across the canal at the crossing of the canal and Central Avenue and street graded to correspond, was read and referred on motion to the committee on streets and alleys.
1886
Arkansas City Republican, January 2, 1886.
As soon as the 5th avenue K. C. & S. W. Depot is completed, a bridge will be placed across the canal and 5th Avenue graded up and made the main thoroughfare to the two depots. Soon we will have telegraphic service along the K. C. & S. W. Road. The poles are up along the line between here and Beaumont, and the wire has been attached as far this way as Latham.
Believe the following refers to bridge at Wichita...Arkansas City had only 4 wards.
Arkansas City Traveler, January 6, 1886.
The Eagle of yesterday says: “The Arkansas river looked quite Icelandic yesterday. It was not quite frozen over, but the ice was piled up glacier like along the bars, and the wind whistled through the iron frame work of the bridge like the Arctic winds through the rigging of a ship. The reporter as he wended his storm beaten form across the river to skirmish the Fifth ward for pointers, found that a large amount of wind without and a circumscribed amount within made Jordan a hard stream to cross.”
Excerpts...
Arkansas City Traveler, January 6, 1886.
COUNCIL PROCEEDINGS.
Our City Fathers Perplexed With An Empty Treasury.
Council met at 7 o’clock on Monday evening, Mayor Schiffbauer in the chair; Councilmen Bailey and Hight absent.
Messrs. Dean and Dunn objected to the [?WORD?] being made with earth, they preferred gravel for the purpose. Mr. Hill said if the applicant would dump his surplus dirt in the slew, at the price named, it would be wise in the city to buy it of him. To fill in and make a road to the canal would cost $500. Mr. Young had offered to contribute from his own pocket to the expense, he (Mr. Hill) would also give his mite. The cost would be $500, and he and Mr. Young would give $100 of the sum. The remainder could be raised by subscription. To bring the matter fairly before the council, he offered the following resolution.
Resolved, That the city council appropriate a sufficient sum from the city treasury, to grade a roadway along Fifth Avenue west from Summit Street to the canal, and build a bridge there.
The mayor said the question of bridging the canal was now under consideration by the street committee of the council.
Mr. Dunn, in behalf of the committee, recommended that the canal company be ordered to build a bridge on Central Avenue, and that the railroad company be required to make crossings.
Mr. Hill inquired where the people who crossed the bridge would go to. There was a grade of eight feet at that point, and trestles were to be put up raising the track eight feet higher.
Mr. Will Mowry asked leave to make a statement in regard to a conversation he had held with Mr. Hill, which brought out an explanation by the latter.
A long and informal debate ensued, in which the respective merits of Fifth Avenue and Central Avenue as an approach to the depot were discussed.
Several amendments to Mr. Hill’s resolution being offered, but not seconded, that gentleman asked leave to withdraw it and substitute the following.
Resolved, That the city furnish the necessary means to grade a road to the new depot and build a bridge across the canal; provided that the canal company pay the appraised value of one of their ordinary bridges, the mayor to appoint a board of appraisement.
Mr. Dunn said there was no money in the treasury to perform this work. The cost of grading and bridging had been estimated at $900. His plan was for the city to appropriate $200, and collect from the lot owners on Fifth Avenue, what money they are willing to give. Turn this over to the railroad company, and let them do the work.
Mr. Hill said the Kansas City and Southwestern people, being too poor to operate their road, it had been turned over to the St. Louis and San Francisco company. We were now dealing with a management whose headquarters was in St. Louis. If the council could convince those people that it was a wise thing for them to expend their money in grading a road down to the railroad track, this proposition would do well enough. But the chance of success he thought slim. He did not favor offending them with any such demand, but would reserve his powder for bigger game. A handsome depot had been built, the best on the line, and a turntable laid down; we now want a roundhouse built capable of holding all the engines on the road. The speaker told of a syndicate in Winfield, who had clubbed together to buy a section or two of land a few miles south of the city, with a view to make a town there, and play off against this city. If Arkansas City could give the railroad company a good tank and other appliances, they would be apt to treat us with the same liberality. There were many necessary things to ask them without a demand for $500 to build a road with. The city ought to build this road, if we have to let our washing bills go unpaid.
Mr. Dunn said it would be well for the city to give $200 to the people of any avenue who will make a grade to the depot.
Mr. Prescott favored raising the appropriation to $300. The account would then stand in this shape: $300 given by the city, $100 by Messrs. Young and Hill, $150 by the canal company, leaving $350 to be raised by property owners. This money he thought could be collected, and Mr. Hilliard has offered to carry round the subscription paper.
This being put as an amendment to Mr. Hill’s resolution, was adopted and the resolution (thus amended) was also adopted.
[K. C. & S. W. CONTRACTOR WAYLAID.]
Arkansas City Republican, January 16, 1886.
A. McDonald, a sub-contractor on the K. C. & S. W. Road between here and the state line, was way-laid at the south canal bridge last Saturday night while on his way to camp south of town with a load of provisions. McDonald’s story is as follows.
When he arrived at the south canal bridge last Saturday evening at about dark, his team was stopped and he was fiercely attacked by two disguised men, who beat him with clubs. He was knocked from his wagon and left lying on the ground senseless, while the two men made their escape. A son of Wm. Kirtley discovered McDonald and put him in the wagon and brought him back up to the hotel, where Dr. Fowler was called to dress the wounds. The Doctor upon examination found that a severe cut had been inflicted upon the right side of the head across the ear about four inches in length and in depth to the temporal bone. Several other cuts had been inflicted upon McDonald’s forehead, but they were minor ones. McDonald holds that the parties who attacked him were men who held a grudge against him and not robbers. We are told that McDonald was drinking some, but was not intoxicated. Dr. Fowler informs us that such wounds could have been inflicted by McDonald falling from the wagon and striking the wheel. No arrests have been made.
Arkansas City Republican, January 16, 1886.
The Frisco folks would please the people better who travel the road to the west bridge, by keeping the engine from standing on or under the crossing. Some complaints have been made.
Arkansas City Republican, January 23, 1886.
Serious apprehensions have been entertained this week by our citizens for the safety of the west Arkansas River bridge. The usual January thaw has been expected. The ice on the river is very thick; in fact, thicker than it was ever known to be in this vicinity before. The average thickness is about 12 inches and a sudden and rapid thaw followed by the break-up would make short work of both the bridge and the dam. Last winter they were washed out and the cost to the water power company and to our citizens to replace them was $3,000. Our enterprising citizens have been putting their heads together this week to devise some means by which a recurrence of last winter’s disaster can be avoided. The most feasible plan suggested is the driving of piling posts above the bridge to break the force of the floating avalanches of ice.
Arkansas City Traveler, January 27, 1886.
To prevent damage to the bridge from an ice gorge, men are employed sawing a channel in the stream, and we hear that dynamite will be exploded to break up the ice. Every precaution will be used to avoid disaster.
Arkansas City Traveler, January 27, 1886.
John Landes, manager of the Arkansas City Roller Mills Company, suggests that farmers lose no time in bringing in their wheat, as in the event of damage to the bridge from a jam of ice, they will be shut off from the city for some time.
[STORM IN INDIAN NATION.]
Arkansas City Republican, February 20, 1886.
Notes from Kansas City Times.
Frank Jackson writes to Oswego friends from Arkansas City, Kansas, that he and a party of companions were in the Indian Nation during the severe storm of last month and for three days they subsisted upon a few biscuits; and to prevent themselves from being frozen, they had to lie down and let the snow cover them. There are a thousand people in Arkansas City now waiting for the Oklahoma country to be opened for settlement.
Arkansas City commenced Sunday to blow up the Arkansas River with dynamite and has since been whaling away. The ice on the river was thicker than ever before and a terrible ice gorge was anticipated, in which case the long bridge above the dam must go. James Hill and the city council got up this dynamite scheme. The ice next to the dam, of course, would be last to go, giving opportunity for the tremendous gorges to pile up and demolish the bridge. Holes were drilled in the ice, dynamite cartridges inserted with a fuse attached, when everybody would get into the Territory while the thing went off. It knocked “blue blazes” out of the ice and the 500 pounds of dynamite will clear the ice from next to the dam and bridge, giving the gorges a rapid descent over the dam on the water’s swift bosom. It was a fine scheme and will save the bridge.
[Note: It was a good idea and almost worked. However, a previous article shows that several spans of the bridge collapsed. Too bad there are two missing issues of paper.]
Arkansas City Republican, February 20, 1886.
As we stated last week, fears were entertained by our citizens that the west Arkansas River wagon bridge would go out upon the breaking up of the ice. Tuesday, a part of the gorge gave away and swept down the river at a fearful velocity, carrying two bents of the bridge with it. Wednesday another bent was taken out by another avalanche of ice. About 100 feet of the bridge has been taken out. The ice gorge has gone as far up the river as can be seen. The gorge at the west bridge was so compact and large that the channel of the river was changed to the bottoms west of the river for several days. The grading of the G. S. C. & N. W. Road was washed out by the changed course of the river for about 80 rods. This wash-out has been refilled. Considerable damage was done to the bottom lands west of the river by the washing of debris upon the land by the high water. The dam was not damaged very badly. Workmen had been engaged for two weeks past trying to ease up the expected gorge and wash-out. Their efforts were futile, however. For the third time in the last two years this west bridge has washed out.
Arkansas City Traveler, February 24, 1886.
We publish on another page the full text of Senator Jennings’ bill in relation to building and maintaining bridges in Cowley County, which has passed the legislature and is now a law. We are indebted to Hon. L. P. King for a printed copy of the bill.
SENATOR JENNINGS’ ACT.
An Act to Provide for the County to Build and Repair Bridges.
The following bill was presented in the Senate of the State Legislature, by Mr. Jennings, and passed both Houses.
An act in relation to building and maintaining bridges in Cowley County, Kansas.
Be it enacted by the Legislature of the State of Kansas:
SECTION 1. Whenever the trustees of any township, or the mayor and council in cities of the second class, in the county of Cowley, shall present to the board of county commissioners of said county a petition, signed by two-fifths of the resident taxpayers of such township or city, praying for the construction of a bridge within said township or city at a point to be mentioned in said petition, the necessary cost of which will exceed five hundred dollars, the board of county commissioners shall immediately inquire into the facts set forth in such petition, and if the said board deem the building of said bridge of sufficient public necessity and utility, it shall determine upon a plan, the kind of materials to be used, and estimate the cost thereof.
SECTION 2. The said board of county commissioners, after determining the necessity and public utility of building a bridge under section 1 of this act, shall submit to the qualified electors of the township or city in which said bridge is proposed to be built, at a special election to be held for that purpose, a proposition as to whether said township or city shall pay one-third of the cost of building said bridge; which proposition shall state the precise point at which such proposed bridge is to be constructed, the kind of materials to be used, and the estimated cost of the same. At least twenty days’ notice of the time and place of holding said election, either by publication for three consecutive weeks in some newspaper of general circulation in said township or city, or by posting up printed notices thereof in not less than eight conspicuous places in said township or city.
SECTION 3. Such elections shall be held at the usual places for holding elections in such townships or city, and shall be conducted by the officers or persons provided by law for the holding elections in any township or city, and shall be governed according to the rules and regulations provided by law for the holding of other township or city elections.
SECTION 4. The vote at such election shall be by ballot, and the tickets used shall have written or printed thereon the words, “For the building of the bridge,” or “Against the building of the bridge,” and if a majority of the vote cast at such election have the words, “For the building of the bridge,” then the proposition shall be declared to be carried.
SECTION 5. The county commissioners of said county shall, immediately after the proposition to build a bridge under this act shall have been declared carried, advertise the time and place of letting the contract for the construction of such bridge, by publication in some newspaper of the county and of general circulation therein, for at least three consecutive weeks, and shall in said notice state the kind of bridge, its dimensions, and the material to be used in the bridge, its piers and abutments. They shall receive only sealed proposals for the building of the same, and no proposal shall be received after 12 o’clock M. of the day advertised for letting said contract.
SECTION 6. Said board of county commissioners shall let said contract to the lowest responsible bidder, provided said lowest bid for completing said bridge ready for travel does not exceed the original estimate upon which the election in the township or city authorizing the building of such bridge was submitted, in which case said board shall re-advertise for bids in the manner as if no bids had been received.
SECTION 7. The board of county commissioners, after the proposition shall have been declared carried in any township or city, shall levy a bridge tax upon the entire taxable property of such township or city having voted to build a bridge under the provisions of this act, sufficient to raise one-third the estimated cost of building such bridge as stated in the election proclamation, and no more, which levy shall be extended on the tax roll and collected as other taxes; and if more taxes are thus collected than are necessary, after such bridge is built, the balance shall be turned over to the road and bridge fund of such township or city: Provided, That if the petition presented to the board of commissioners by the trustee or mayor and council, asking for the building of such bridge, shall ask that the tax be levied in two years, then said board shall levy half each year; but the contract to build such bridge shall not be let until half of said tax is levied and collected; And provided further, That if the estimated cost of such bridge exceeds six thousand dollars, then said board of county commissioners shall make no levy unless directed so to do, within twenty days after the votes of said election are canvassed by the township board through the trustee or the mayor and council of such city through the mayor, but the township board or mayor and council may issue the bonds of the township or city as hereafter mentioned.
SECTION 8. No bonds shall be executed and sold to build any bridge or bridges under the provisions of this act by said county, nor shall any township or city in said county, issue its bonds to pay its proportionate share, unless the entire estimated cost of such bridge shall exceed six thousand dollars, in which event such township or city may issue its bonds in denominations of not less than one hundred dollars, and shall be payable as such city may direct, in not less than five or more than twenty years from the date thereof, with interest not to exceed eight per centum per annum, which said interest shall be payable semi-annually, at such place as the principal sum is made payable, and for which said interest said bonds shall have coupons attached; and such bonds and coupons shall be signed by the township trustee, and attested by the clerk, or by the mayor of such city, and attested by the city clerk; and the money received from the sale of said bonds shall be turned over to the county treasurer of said county, to be held by him in the same manner as if said money had been collected in taxes.
SECTION 9. The township or city officers of any township or city in said county issuing bonds under the provisions of this act shall levy each year and cause to be collected as other taxes are collected, sufficient tax to pay the interest on said bonds as they shall become due, and create a sinking fund for the final redemption of such bonds, which taxes shall be collected as other taxes are collected, and when collected shall be and remain a specific fund for such purposes only. If said bonds run for a period of more than five years, then such sinking fund may be annually invested in bonds of the United States, State of Kansas, or bonds of the township or city issued under the provisions of this act, and not more than their face value. Bonds so purchased shall be held by the township or city, and when the bonds issued under this act shall become due, such purchased bonds shall be sold at the highest market price, and the proceeds applied to the redemption of the bonds issued under this act.
SECTION 10. The county commissioners of said Cowley County are authorized to levy a tax annually on all the taxable property of said county, of not exceeding three mills on the dollar, for the purpose of providing a bridge fund, to be expended under the provisions of this act.
SECTION 11. The board of county commissioners shall have the exclusive control of letting all contracts under the provisions of this act, and making payments therefor, and the county treasurer shall pay out no money out of the bridge fund for any township or city, created under the provisions of this act, except upon a warrant signed by the chairman of such board and attested by the county clerk; Provided further, No money shall be paid to any person, company, or corporation contracting to build such bridge, until all the materials for such bridge are on the ground; And provided further, That not more than half the cost of building such bridge shall be paid until such bridge is completed and accepted by the board.
SECTION 12. All bridges constructed under the provisions of this act shall thereafter be repaired and kept up jointly by the township or city in which said bridge is located, and the county, the township, or city bearing one-third and the county two-thirds of such expense.
SECTION 13. All bridges proposed to be built under this act, over any stream or other place requiring such bridge, and across the boundary line between two townships, or between a city and township, in said county, the election for such bridge shall be called in such township, or township and city, at the same time and in the same manner as hereinbefore provided for holding the election in one township or city; and if a majority of the votes case in such township, or township and city, shall be in favor of the proposition, then the board of county commissioners shall levy and collect from each of said townships, or townships and city, one-sixth the cost of such bridge, which shall be expended as herein provided.
SECTION 14. The board of county commissioners of said Cowley County shall hereafter appropriate out of the bridge fund of said county, money sufficient to pay two-thirds of the necessary repairs and expenses of keeping up any bridge or bridges already built by township or townships, or city, or by the county, where the original cost exceeds $300 [?? NOT SURE OF THE FIGURE GIVEN ?]; and such township or townships, or city, in which such bridge or bridges are located, shall pay one-third the expense of the repairs and expenses out of the road and bridge or other tax fund of such township or townships or city.
SECTION 15. It shall be the duty of the township trustee of each township in said county, and the mayor of such city, to supervise the repairing of the bridges in his township or city; and whenever the road overseer shall notify the township trustee, or the street commissioners notify the mayor, that any bridge needs repairing, the trustee or mayor shall at once take the necessary steps to, and shall make such repairs; Provided, If such repairs at one time shall exceed $100, then such trustee or mayor shall confer with the chairman of the board of county commissioners, who shall, with such trustee or mayor, have such repairs made if any be necessary.
SECTION 16. Whenever the township board of any township, or the mayor and council of such city, in said county, shall declare on the records of their township or city that the building of a bridge is necessary at some point in their township or city, and that the cost of the same will be less than five hundred dollars and more than one hundred dollars, then the township trustee or mayor shall immediately present a copy of the record of the action of such township or city to the board of county commissioners, and if said board deem the building of such bridge practicable and of sufficient public necessity and utility, and that it will cost less than five hundred dollars and more than one hundred dollars, said commissioners may build the same as provided herein for the building of other bridges, without an election for that purpose being held in the township or townships or city where such bridge is located.
SECTION 17. All bridges in said county costing one hundred dollars or less shall be built and repaired exclusively by the township or city in which they may be situated.
SECTION 18. That when two or more townships or cities in said county shall vote for the building of bridges, at or near the same time, then said bridges shall be built in the order in which the propositions were voted, unless the board is clearly satisfied that one or more of such bridges is of greater public necessity and utility than the others, in which case the bridge of most necessity to the public may be built first.
SECTION 19. Before this act shall take effect and be in force in said county, an election shall be called and held in said county for the purpose of taking the sense of the electors of said county as to whether this act shall be in force in said county; and if a majority of the votes cast at such election shall be in favor of this act, then said board shall, on the day said vote is canvassed, enter upon the records of the commissioners of said county an order declaring the act in full force and effect in said county, and thereafter this act shall be in full force and effect in said county.
SECTION 20. That for the purpose of taking the sense of the voters of said county, as provided in the preceding section, the board of county commissioners of such county shall call a special election, to be held for that purpose, on the first Tuesday in April, 1886, and public notice of the time and purpose of said election shall be given for at least twenty days in the official paper of said county, and by posting written or printed handbills at each of the several voting precincts in said county. The votes for the proposition shall have written or printed thereon, “For the special bridge act,” and those against shall have written or printed thereon, “Against the special bridge act.” Such elections shall be conducted in all other respects as provided in the general election laws of the state.
SECTION 21. This act shall take effect and be in force after its publication in the Winfield Courier, and after it shall have been carried at the election herein provided for, and the order to that effect made by the board of county commissioners of said county.
Arkansas City Traveler, February 24, 1886.
The ice gorge having passed away carrying several spans of the west bridge with it, prompt steps were taken by our merchants to repair the mischief. On the suggestion of a number of our citizens, a special meeting of the city council was held on Friday evening, and that body adopted a resolution to petition the district court to annex that portion of territory lying west of the bridge, and owned by the water power company. This action was evidently taken to enable the city to raise a revenue from the territory annexed to aid toward keeping the bridge in repair. On the adjournment of the council, the citizens convened a meeting, and resolved to advertise for proposals to repair the bridge. The cost of the work, it is expected, will be from $400 to $500. A report of the proceedings will be found in another column.
Arkansas City Traveler, February 24, 1886.
REPAIRING THE WEST BRIDGE.
A Resolution to Annex Territory, and a Plan to Restore the West Bridge.
On Friday Mayor Schiffbauer received the following petition. ARKANSAS CITY, Feb. 19, 1886. To his honor F. P. Schiffbauer, mayor of the city of Arkansas City, Kansas:
The undersigned members of the council of Arkansas City respectfully request your honor to call a special meeting of the council this evening (Feb. 19th) for the purpose of taking some action in regard to the repairing of the bridge across the Arkansas River west of town, and annexing certain territory to the corporate limits of the city of Arkansas City.
A. A. DAVIS,
JAMES HILL,
JACOB HIGHT, Councilmen.
H. G. BAILEY,
C. G. THOMPSON.
To which acting Mayor Thompson responded as follows.
ARKANSAS CITY, KANS., Feb. 19, 1886.
I hereby call a special meeting of the council of the city of Arkansas City, in pursuance to the above call. C. G. THOMPSON, Acting Mayor.
At 7:30 o’clock the same evening the council convened, all the members except Dean and Bailey were present. Mr. A. A. Newman, in behalf of himself and others, asked that the council memorialize the district judge to annex certain territory to the corporate limits of the city. On motion the following resolution was adopted.
Resolved, That notice is hereby given to whom it may concern, that on the 15th day of March, A. D. 1886, the city council of Arkansas City, county of Cowley, and state of Kansas, shall in the name of said city present a petition to the Hon. E. S. Torrance, judge of the district court of Cowley County, state of Kansas, praying for an order declaring that the following territory lying adjacent to the limits of said city of Arkansas City, described by metes and bounds, as follows, to-wit:
The property owned by the Arkansas City water power company, commencing at a point twenty (20) feet north of the southwest corner of the northwest quarter of section twenty-five (25), township thirty-four (34), range three (3) east, extending thence west three (3) rods to the north line of the right of way of the Arkansas City water power company’s canal; thence in a westerly direction along the north line of said canal about one hundred and fifty (150) rods to the east bank of the Arkansas River; thence southerly about ten (10) rods to a point where the north line of the public highway, extending east and west through the center of said section twenty-five (25), intersects the east bank of said Arkansas River; thence westerly across said river about 840 feet to the northeast corner of lot No. Four (4), section twenty-six (26), township thirty-four (34), range three (3) east; thence west twenty (20) rods; thence south sixteen (16) rods; thence east about twenty (20) rods to the west bank of the Arkansas River; thence easterly across said river about eight hundred and forty (840) feet, to a point on the east bank of said river two hundred (200) feet south of the north line of lot two (2) of said section twenty-five (25); thence east across said lot three hundred (300) feet; thence east along the south line of said highway to the city limits, about one hundred and forty (140) rods, containing seven and one-half (7-1/2) acres more or less; and thence north forty (40) feet to the place of beginning; making the same a part of the corporate limits of said city of Arkansas City, and made to all intents and purposes, contemplated in the law, under which said city is incorporated, a part of said city, and that this notice shall be published for three (3) consecutive weeks in the Arkansas City TRAVELER immediately hereafter.
The council then adjourned.
Arkansas City Traveler, February 24, 1886.
On the adjournment of the council, a citizens’ meeting was held in the same chamber to take immediate steps toward repairing the west bridge. The meeting organized by appointing W. D. Kreamer chairman and James Benedict secretary.
Mr. Hill moved that the chair appoint a committee consisting of members of the city council and of the board of trade to prepare a plan and estimate of the cost of repairing said bridge, which plan and estimate shall be submitted to the council for their approval. The motion being adopted the chair appointed as such committee Messrs. Hight, Hill, and T. H. McLaughlin, with instructions to make a report as soon as possible. Adjourned.
Arkansas City Republican, March 6, 1886.
The Commissioners at their meeting Tuesday called an election to confirm the county bridge law, to be held the 6th of April.
Arkansas City Republican, March 13, 1886.
Our readers may not be aware that the new bridge law passed by our last legislature will be submitted to the voters of Cowley County April 6—the same time our city election occurs—for ratification or rejection. People in the city should register.
Arkansas City Republican, March 13, 1886.
Register if you desire to vote for the new bridge law.
Arkansas City Republican, March 13, 1886.
The bridge comes up April 6 for ratification. Do you want to vote upon it? If you do, register.
Arkansas City Republican, March 20, 1886.
Last evening another accident happened at the South Canal Bridge. Samuel Gambel, wife, and son, and another gentleman of Bolton Township were returning home and, in attempting to cross that affair over the canal called a bridge, were all dumped in—people, horses, wagon, and all its contents, consisting of groceries and household goods, many of which were lost or ruined. By the prompt help of parties who were near, the people and horses were saved. The wagon was badly broken, and the harness entirely ruined. Why is the bridge left in this condition? No railing and about ten feet of the plank are broken off just leaving the width of a wagon to cross.
Arkansas City Republican, March 20, 1886.
Chas. Talburt and Miss Callie Plumb were coming to the city from Bolton Township Thursday evening in a buggy. In attempting to cross the South Canal Bridge, the horses became frightened and backed off. Miss Plumb saved herself from falling into the canal by jumping. Mr. Talburt, buggy, and horses all went over the bridge into the water. There is no railing on this bridge. Mr. Talburt will sue for damages. The condition of that South Canal Bridge is a disgrace to a civilized community.
Arkansas City Republican, March 27, 1886.
Dr. Chastain Murdered by A. B. Elliott.
Another murder has been committed in Cowley County, making the third in the last nine months. This time the crime was committed at Dexter. The murderer was A. B. Elliott and the man murdered was Dr. Chastain. The doctor is a married man, his wife living in Georgia. He began paying attention to the daughter of Elliott some time ago, the latter objecting. He sent his daughter to Arkansas and the doctor followed her there. Elliott telegraphed to have him arrested, but he avoided the officials and returned to Dexter Monday. Elliott loaded up his shot-gun, concealed himself under a bridge over which Chastain had to pass in going out of Dexter. When the doctor came along, Elliott stepped out and discharged both barrels of his shot gun, completely riddling him with buck-shot. The doctor fell and died in a few minutes. Elliott disappeared at once, but was arrested late in the evening by Sheriff McIntire. He was taken to Winfield and put in jail to await the preliminary examination. Elliott tells the following to the Courier representative concerning the deed.
“When Chastain was within twenty feet of the bridge, with my shot gun resting against the abutment, two feet from me, I stepped out and halted him.
“I asked him: ‘Is that so, what you said about me—that you were going to kill me?’
“Like a flash he reached into his side pocket, as he said, ‘You g d d n s n of a b ,’ and I saw his revolver.
“I grabbed my gun and fired. I didn’t have time to aim. I was within ten feet of him and he threw up his hands and fell backwards off his horse, without a word.
“One of Chastain’s feet caught in the stirrup and with a bound, the horse dragged him about forty feet. He stopped, and parties soon came. They found Chastain dead.”
Murders in Cowley County are getting to be entirely too frequent.
Arkansas City Republican, March 27, 1886.
Work on the improvement of 5th Avenue has commenced. The bridge across the canal is almost constructed. Grading of the street will commence soon.
Arkansas City Republican, April 3, 1886.
The bridge across the canal on 5th Avenue is completed. The grading of the avenue is going on.
Arkansas City Republican, April 3, 1886.
A large number of citizens of the 4th ward met in Blakeney & Herbert’s store Wednesday and took the preliminary steps toward raising funds to bridge the canal at 7th Avenue and to grade the street. About $700 was subscribed by those in attendance. The street is to be graded all the way to the west bridge and to the depot. This avenue will make one of the principal streets leading to the Frisco depot.
Excerpt...
Arkansas City Republican, April 10, 1886.
Council Proceedings.
A resolution was passed extending the city limits across the Arkansas River, so as to take in both the railroad bridge and the highway bridge. Lawyer Jenkins was appointed to draw up the necessary papers.
Excerpts...
[ELECTION.]
Arkansas City Republican, April 10, 1886.
FIRST WARD.
For the special Bridge act 180.
SECOND WARD.
For the Special Bridge act 185.
THIRD WARD.
For the Special Bridge act 130.
FOURTH WARD.
For the Special Bridge act 211.
The vote for the special bridge act was 715. The REPUBLICAN is satisfied, Arkansas City has redeemed herself most nobly.
Arkansas City Republican, April 10, 1886.
The south Arkansas River Bridge had an attack of general debility Monday; a span came near going out. Teams were prevented from crossing for several days. It has been repaired and travel has been resumed.
Arkansas City Republican, April 10, 1886.
A party of Santa Fe surveyors, in attempting to cross the south canal bridge, went overboard Monday. One of the boys received a ducking. No one was injured. The harness had to be cut almost to pieces in getting the mules out. Something must be done about that bridge or Arkansas City will lose trade.
Arkansas City Republican, April 10, 1886.
At the election Tuesday the voters of Cowley County decided they wanted to adopt the bridge law, but it was only by a small majority. Winfield voted solidly against the proposition, Arkansas City for it, and the consequence was we triumphed as we always do.
Excerpts...
[CORRESPONDENTS.]
Arkansas City Republican, April 17, 1886.
Items from 32.
Creswell did her work nobly concerning the bridge project. If other townships want bridges, they had better build them. The Creswell farmers are going to defeat the Independence & Southwestern road. “Remember what we tole you.”
Don’t it strike the good people of Creswell that it might be a good thing if a little work was done on the road east of the Walnut bridge?
Arkansas City Republican, April 17, 1886.
The bridge proposition was lost by about 550 majority at the election of April 6. The REPUBLICAN was in error when it stated last week that it had been carried by a small majority.
Excerpt...
[CORRESPONDENTS.]
Arkansas City Republican, April 17, 1886.
East Bolton Items.
Now that the bridge act has been defeated, let us go to work and do the next best thing: that is to keep the bridge in order.
Arkansas City Republican, April 24, 1886.
One of the handsomest avenues in the city will be the 7th. It is being graded all the way to the Frisco depot and a substantial bridge is almost completed across the canal. The citizens of the 7th Avenue are enterprising beyond a doubt.
Arkansas City Republican, May 8, 1886.
EDS. REPUBLICAN: In your last issue we find over the signature, “Z. C.,” that the south bridge and road from the south bridge to the city are not “jackassable.” From the tone of the terrible brayer we would infer that he is from the south side of the great stream, but how he ever got over that road and then complained of its not being jackassable is a query with Creswellites. Now if the long and loud brayer would turn his attention to the township affairs and bray his township awake and get them to pay Creswell what they justly owe it, then he might get to cease braying. Bray on, old jack; it will be a long time before you cross the big sandy at Creswell’s expense. F. M. V.
Arkansas City Republican, May 8, 1886.
The contract for repairing the west Arkansas River Bridge has been let to Engineer Wingate. It is to be made passable within 15 days.
Excerpts...
[CITY COUNCIL.]
Arkansas City Republican, May 22, 1886.
Council Proceedings.
The city council met Monday evening in regular session. Present: C. G. Thompson, C. G. Thurston, A. A. Davis, A. D. Prescott, J. Hight, C. Dean, and O. Ingersoll.
The ordinance annexing the strip of land to the city limits and taking in the west Arkansas River Bridge was passed, Judge Torrance having granted permission.
The report of the committee on building a bridge across the canal on 7th Avenue was read and accepted. The city clerk was ordered to issue scrip to the amount of $211.66 in payment thereof.
Arkansas City Republican, May 22, 1886.
Some careless hauler of building stone from across the river allowed a very large stone to fall from his wagon just at the approach of the south bridge. It has never been removed and there it remains in the way, frightening horses. It will be remembered that the approach to this bridge is somewhat hazardous anyway, and a large stone obstructing the passage only makes it more so. Who ever left it fall there should remove it.
Arkansas City Republican, Saturday, May 29, 1886. From Friday’s Daily.
Third Avenue is being extended across the canal and on through Oak Grove Addition. A bridge will be built across the Canal. It will not be long until all the avenues and the streets will have bridges across the canal. How we boom!
Arkansas City Republican, Saturday, June 5, 1886. From Tuesday’s Daily.
Engineer Wingate, who has the contract for repairing the west Arkansas River bridge, informs us that he will have it done by Saturday morning of this week. It will be a more substantial bridge than it ever has been heretofore.
Arkansas City Republican, Saturday, June 5, 1886. From Friday’s Daily.
The west bridge will be open for travel in the morning (Saturday). The flooring is almost down.
[FIGHT.]
Arkansas City Republican, June 5, 1886.
Thursday afternoon a fight occurred on the highway in the vicinity of the south Arkansas River bridge. It was between Wm. Brinker and John Phillips. The fight grew out of a dispute over a pair of oars. They are fishermen and had been down in the Territory until Sunday. They had been fishing in the Arkansas south of town since. Yesterday Brinker met Phillips on horseback and the quarrel began. The former was going after the oars and the latter objected. The result was Phillips pulled his pocket knife and made a slash at Brinker, striking him in the forehead with the point of the blade and passing down the side of his nose and through his upper lip. Phillips slipped from his horse and was continuing the carving when passers-by separated them. Brinker was cut up pretty badly. One gash in the back, another in the back of his head, and his face cut as stated above. Phillips came to the city and told Brinker’s acquaintances that he had cut his heart out. They went down and brought him up to Steinberger & Coombs’ Drug Store, where Drs. Geo. Wright, J. A. Mitchell, and E. Y. Baker dressed and sewed up the wounds. Phillips as soon as he told what he had done disappeared and has not since been seen. It is told of him that he killed a man over east of here in this county sometime ago by hitting him on the head with the butt end of his revolver. Brinker will pull through all right.
[SKELETON FOUND IN RIVER.]
Arkansas City Republican, June 5, 1886.
A few evenings since a number of small boys and a physician of this city furnished our citizens with a short season of great excitement. About 7 o’clock a bevy of young lads concluded to take a bath and accordingly repaired to the Walnut River just east of town. While engaged in various acrobatic feats after entering the stream, one of their number came in contact with a huge box and called to his assistance one of the company, and the two elevated it to the surface of the water, when it was found to be perforated with large holes. By this time all had gathered around the supposed prize, which was pronounced by those present to be a fish-trap, and from its heft they surmised that upon the inside was a large number of the finny tribe, and all hands joined in landing the supposed treasure. The top was raised sufficient to admit the hand of one of their number, which came in contact with something which did not appear at all fishy either by touch or smell, and he suggested the removal of the lid, which was soon accomplished, and lo and behold! Their eager eyes were startled by the ghastly grin of a human skeleton. It was unnecessary for the order to retreat, but with trembling fright all fled to town and announced that they had found a dead body concealed in a box in the river.
It was not long ere a score or more people were assembled at the scene of the discovery, and instead of the decomposed body of some unfortunate—as they expected—they found the fleshless bones of a human being.
The mystery was soon cleared up by a young physician who recently graduated from a medical college coming forward and acknowledging the ownership to the property. He says that the skeleton is that of a railroad man. He procured it from Cincinnati, and that he had but a few days previously placed it in the river for the purpose of properly bleaching it.
Arkansas City Republican, Saturday, June 12, 1886. From Tuesday’s Daily.
The Arkansas River is on a terrible high. This morning the dam began washing out at the side and at about 10 o’clock the report was prevalent that about 40 feet had gone. It is feared that the end of the bridge, on this side of the river, will go, as the bank or approach is crumbling away. Our citizens are putting in their best efforts to save further destruction. Hay, stone, etc., is being hauled and thrown in to prevent a further wash out of the approach. It seemed for a time as if the current would cut through between the bridge and canal and change the course of the river through the land of John Love. That danger has been averted and the bridge up to press hour was still there.
LATER. The river has run over the approach.
Arkansas City Republican, Saturday, June 12, 1886. From Wednesday’s Daily.
First Avenue has just been opened up and the canal bridged by the property owners along the street.
Arkansas City Republican, Saturday, June 12, 1886. From Wednesday’s Daily.
This morning a REPUBLICAN representative ensconced in one of Hilliard & Keeler’s fine livery rigs, visited the west bridge, and witnessed what damage the high waters of the Arkansas River are doing. About 200 feet of the dam has been washed out and the entire stream has been turned into a channel of that width on this side of the river. It has been making rapid inroads upon the approach; but by the throwing in of brush and other debris, the calamity of the bridge going has been averted. A strip of about 500 feet of the bed of the river is perfectly dry and extends a considerable distance upstream.
Arkansas City Republican, Saturday, June 12, 1886. From Wednesday’s Daily.
This part of Cowley County furnishes some of the finest building and sidewalk stone we ever cast our eyes upon. Two of the largest stones that have ever been utilized in building in Arkansas City is to be put in one at each door of the National Bank extension. The stones are 16 x 12 feet and 6 inches thick. The weight of each was over five tons. Six horses were used to haul them from the quarry across the Walnut River. In crossing the bridge, the horses were unhitched and the wagon and load taken across by men. It was feared the bridge would be crushed by such a heavy weight crossing.
Arkansas City Republican, Saturday, June 12, 1886. From Friday’s Daily.
Geo. Allen came up from a trip to the west Arkansas River bridge at about 10 a.m. He tells us that the river is again rising; 20 feet of the old part of the bridge is gone between the eastern approach and the new part just put in.
Arkansas City Republican, Saturday, June 12, 1886. From Friday’s Daily.
Captain Thompson, a steamboat captain on the Ohio River, is in the city. He came here to investigate the navigating of the Arkansas. He arrived 24 hours too late to take the “Kansas Millers” for Fort Smith. Capt. Thompson says the Arkansas is navigable upon the plan proposed by our millers. He will remain in our city several days.
Arkansas City Republican, June 19, 1886.
One of Winfield’s Many Lies.
From the Peoria Journal, we get the following special dispatch. Our readers can readily see to what desperate means they are resorting to injure our town.
“WINFIELD, KANSAS, June 9. The Arkansas River is higher at Arkansas City, Kansas, than at any period since the settlement of this part of the state. The whole country in the neighborhood of Arkansas City is overflowed, and the damage to crops cannot be estimated. The flood has carried away 200 feet of the dam in the Arkansas used to force the water through a canal to the Walnut River for water power. It is also stated that the wagon bridge across the Arkansas has been swept away, cutting off communication to the country on the southwest.”
Everybody who resides near the Arkansas River in Kansas knows that it is not higher than it ever has been; that none of the land in this vicinity was overflowed, and that there was no damage done to crops. Whoever dispatched the above is the monumental liar of the Arkansas Valley.
Arkansas City Republican, Saturday, June 19, 1886. From Tuesday’s Daily.
Work has commenced in putting in the part washed out of the West Arkansas River Bridge. It is to be completed by Saturday.
Arkansas City Republican, Saturday, June 19, 1886. From Wednesday’s Daily.
The west Arkansas River Bridge is repaired.
Arkansas City Republican, Saturday, June 19, 1886. From Wednesday’s Daily.
The west bridge is completed. Once more our citizens can cross.
Arkansas City Republican, Saturday, June 26, 1886. From Thursday’s Daily.
The Water Power company are talking of running the canal up the river about three quarters of a mile and doing away with the dam at the west bridge. A good scheme.
Excerpts...
Arkansas City Republican, June 26, 1886.
Council Proceedings.
The city council met Monday evening. Present: Mayor F. P. Schiffbauer; councilmen A. D. Prescott, Jas. Hill, O. Ingersoll, C. G. Thompson, A. A. Davis, C. Dean, C. Thurston, and J. Hight.
Bill of Isaac Knight, labor on bridge, $1.50; allowed.
E. B. Wingate, repairing bridge, $1,547; allowed.
Excerpt...
[CORRESPONDENT.]
Arkansas City Republican, July 10, 1886.
Grouse Creek Items.
July 7, 1886.
Still it is hot! We seldom have better weather this time of year. Some of our corn men are fearing a dry spell will be our portion now. Our motto is, “Don’t cross the bridge before you get to it.” The human family is never satisfied. JUMBO.
Arkansas City Republican, July 17, 1886.
A new floor has been laid at the bridge across the Walnut at the Walnut Valley Mills.
Arkansas City Republican, Saturday, July 24, 1886. From Saturday’s Daily.
Alex. Wood, of the City Meat Market, now carries his right arm in a sling. Friday night he was driving some cattle in from across the Walnut. Just after crossing the Harmon bridge, some of the animals left the road, and Alex. started after them on his horse at full speed to chase them back. In his attempt to head them off, he ran into a wire fence, which was hidden from sight in some high weeds. The horse fell head-long over the fence, sending Alex. to the ground with such force as to dislocate his shoulder. Both were badly lacerated by the barbed wire. The cattle were taken to their destination and then Mr. Wood sought medical assistance. He is able to be around on the streets now.
Arkansas City Republican, Saturday, July 24, 1886. From Thursday’s Daily.
The crossing on the Geuda Springs & Caldwell road, just west of the Arkansas River bridge, is sadly in need of repair. This morning F. Heisinger, U. S. Mail carrier between this city and Geuda, was coming in, and in driving across the wheels of the hack were caught in the ruts, breaking it so badly that it had to be hauled in. No one was injured. The attention of the railroad company is called to this crossing and we hope they will repair it before further damage is done to travelers.
Excerpts...
Arkansas City Republican, Saturday, August 7, 1886. From Tuesday’s Daily.
Council Proceedings.
The council met last evening. Present: Mayor Schiffbauer; Councilmen A. D. Prescott, C. Dean, O. Ingersoll, A. A. Davis, C. G. Thompson, Jas. Hill, C. T. Thurston.
Bids for painting west bridge laid on table.
Report of committee on draining slough read and accepted; and city clerk was instructed to make lease on canal property land for the right of way for drain and to procure a warranty deed for right of way through the Crocker place, 100 feet wide, for $400.
City engineer was ordered to advertise for bids for the draining of the slough. The drain is to be 10 feet wide at bottom, two to one on slope. Bids to be opened in 10 days.
Arkansas City Republican, Saturday, August 7, 1886. From Thursday’s Daily.
The Walnut is reported out of its banks. The mail carrier could not take the mail over east this morning because of the back water spreading over the bottoms east of the Harmon Bridge.
Arkansas City Republican, Saturday, August 7, 1886. From Thursday’s Daily.
F. Heisinger came over from Geuda this morning. He informs us that the Arkansas River has already spread all over the bottoms around the Springs and that the water is over the stone wall. When he left this morning, he could almost see the water raise.
[PUTTING UP HAY: C. E. HALE AND BROTHER.]
Arkansas City Traveler, August 11, 1886.
C. E. Hale came in on Saturday from the Ponca reservation. We mentioned a few weeks ago that he and his brother had taken a contract to put up 2,000 or 3,000 tons of hay for the Mt. Auburn Cattle Co. They began cutting about three weeks ago, but found the pasture light and burning up with the heat. The rain came after they had been a few days at work, spoiling about 150 tons they had cut and cured, and keeping their force idle a day or two. But these haymakers are jubilant now. The grass is growing right along, and they expect it will be in good condition till Oct. 1st. Charles returned to camp on Monday, with a wagon load of supplies, and taking his wife and family along. Coming to town Mr. Hale says he found the south bridge carried downstream a little way, and the flooring broken so that teams could not cross. He called for two or three volunteers from the line of vehicles gathered at both ends, and an hour’s work put the bridge in condition for passage. The Hale Bros. receive $1.50 a ton for all the hay put up, and our informant says, if good luck continues, they will have a profitable contract.
Arkansas City Traveler, August 11, 1886.
During the high tide last week, fears were entertained for the safety of all the bridges leading into the city; but the water has since subsided, and the bridges are still passable. The west and south bridges over the Arkansas are a constant source of trouble, and it will be economy, when circumstances warrant, to replace them with more durable structures.
Arkansas City Traveler, August 18, 1886.
A. F. Hale came in from the Territory on Monday evening to purchase supplies for his force of haymakers, and the next morning was chasing Assessor Vaughn, of Creswell Township, to demand of him that the south bridge across the Arkansas be put in fit condition for travel. Just before he crossed over a Bolton farmer, whose name he could not give, had a horse’s leg badly lacerated and his load of hay lost overboard, and Mr. Hale says he took terrible chances in getting over. He demanded of Johnnie Breene that the bridge be repaired in 24 hours or somebody would be sued for damages.
Arkansas City Republican, Saturday, August 21, 1886. From Thursday’s Daily.
This morning a south span, the one recently put in by J. W. Canfield, of the south bridge across the Arkansas went down. Jas. Estus was driving some cattle across and they had just got on this span when it gave away, letting a number of cattle down in the “ragin Rackensack.” Ten of them were injured so badly they had to be killed outright. Others that fell in waded ashore. Mr. Estus had sold the cattle to a man by the name of Shively over in Silverdale Township and was delivering them. Steps are being taken to make the necessary repairs to make the bridge once more passable. That south bridge has been unable [? Do they mean disabled?] for some time now, and if there is any way possible, it should be replaced with a new one.
Arkansas City Traveler, August 25, 1886.
A bid has been before the city council for some weeks past, to paint the west bridge over the Arkansas City, and at the adjourned meeting of that body last Wednesday, it was again read by the clerk. Councilman Thompson remarked there would be a difficulty in getting the bridge to stand up long enough to be painted, which bon mot produced a laugh and the bid was allowed to lie on the table.
Arkansas City Republican, Saturday, August 27, 1886. From Monday’s Daily.
The South Arkansas River Bridge has been repaired.
Arkansas City Republican, Saturday, August 27, 1886. From Thursday’s Daily.
There is a dangerous cavity at the Fifth Avenue Canal Bridge. Someone should see that it is repaired.
Arkansas City Traveler, September 1, 1886.
DRAINING THE SLOUGH.
Recommendations of Mayor Schiffbauer to the Council.
At a special meeting of the city council, held on Monday evening, Aug. 30th, the following communication was read.
To the commission council of Arkansas City, Kansas.
GENTLEMEN: I find, upon examination of the records, that a meeting of the council held July 19th last, Acting Mayor Thompson appointed a committee consisting of Messrs. Wingate, Davis, and Thurston, to investigate and report on the feasibility of draining the slough west of the city. The report of this committee is herewith attached. I further find that on Aug. 2nd the city clerk was ordered to secure the right of way, and that at the same sitting the city engineer was ordered to advertise for bids to excavate a ditch for draining the slough, said ditch to be ten feet at the bottom with 2 to 1 slope. The bids to be opened and considered in ten days.
Now I submit that this system of draining said slough will entail a heavy expense, and become an onerous burden on the taxpayers of the city.
I also hand you herewith an approximate estimate of the cost of the plan proposed, and also the cost of the tile system of drainage, which will answer every required purpose; and this with an eye single to the health and pecuniary interest of the citizens and taxpayers of the city.
From the committee’s report you will see that Messrs. Hill, Newman, and Sleeth offer to give the right of way free of cost; but from the engineer’s diagram, you will find that the survey runs where the right of way will have to be purchased or condemned.
Why a right of way 100 feet wide and a ditch 10 feet wide at the bottom should be wanted for the purpose stated, I am at a loss to understand, when it is a conceded fact that a six inch drain would carry off all the water accumulating in said slough.
You are, therefore, asked to give this matter your candid and careful consideration, and let your action tend to the advantage of your constituents.
All of which is respectfully submitted.
F. P. SCHIFFBAUER.
ESTIMATED COST OF THE LARGE DITCH.
Cost of right of way: $1,080.00
Cost of excavating: $2,640.00
Cost of fencing: $432.29
Cost of bridge: $500.00
TOTAL: $4,652.29
To this will be added a yearly expense for the maintenance of the bridge and the erection of other bridges as the needs of the city require, and for their maintenance for all time.
ESTIMATED COST OF THE TILE SYSTEM.
2,436 feet of the 10 in. tiling at 20 cents: $487.20
Laying the same at 10 cents: $243.60
TOTAL: $730.80
The right of way for this would be freely given, as there would be no obstruction; no fencing would be required, no bridging would be necessary, and in this item alone a great saving would be secured to the taxpayers.
The matter was debated awhile by the council, and laid over till the next meeting.
[DRAINING THE SLOUGH.]
Arkansas City Republican, Saturday, September 4, 1886. From Tuesday’s Daily.
Drainage.
The question of how the slough shall be drained is agitating the minds of the council. At a meeting held July 19, acting mayor Thompson, per instruction of the council, appointed a committee, consisting of Messrs. Wingate, Thurston, and Davis, to investigate and report the feasibility of draining the slough. The committee reported and at a meeting of Aug. 2, the city clerk was ordered to procure the right of way for the ditch. The city engineer, at the same meeting, was ordered to advertise for bids to construct a ditch 10 feet wide at bottom with a slope of 2 feet to 1.
In his recommendation last evening to the council, the mayor said: “Now, I submit that this draining said slough would entail a heavy expense and become a heavy burden on the taxpayers of the city.”
A 10 inch tile system was then recommended for drainage by the mayor, which he stated would answer every purpose demanded by the health and pecuniary interests of the taxpayers of the city.
In support of his recommendation, the mayor furnished figures showing up the costs of the two systems of drainage as follows.
FOR LARGE DITCH.
Right of way: $1,080.00
Excavating: $2,640.00
Fencing: $432.29
Building bridges: $500.00
Total: $4,652.29
To the above is to be added the annual expense of keeping up the bridges besides building others as our growing city may demand them.
FOR TILE SYSTEM.
2,436 feet 10 inch tiling: $487.20
Laying same: $243.60
Total: $730.80
The right of way would be given for this latter system, as there would be no destruction of property, no fencing, and no bridging.
In the wind-up of his recommendations to the council, the mayor said: “Why a right of way 100 feet wide and a ditch 10 feet in width at the bottom should be needed for the drainage of the slough, I am at a loss to know. It is a conceded fact that a 6 inch drain would carry off all the water accumulating in the slough. You are therefore asked to give the matter your earnest and careful consideration and let your actions tend to the advantage of your constituents.”
The REPUBLICAN, like the mayor of the city, does not see why the city should be made to put in a drain large as the canal, costing nearly $5,000, when everyone knows the tile drain would answer the purposes demanded of it and costing about one-seventh as much.
Am very confused over next item: Do they mean railroad bridge bonds?? MAW
Arkansas City Republican, Saturday, September 11, 1886. From Wednesday’s Daily.
Winfield bonds sell at par to home parties. Monday night $13,000 worth of bridge bonds were sold to John Eaton, the banker, he being the only bidder. The council hunted all over the east for another buyer, but no one seemed to want Winfield bonds. The bonds of Arkansas City sell at 3 and 4 cents above par. Such is the standing of the two cities in the far east.
Arkansas City Republican, Saturday, September 25, 1886. From Tuesday’s Daily.
C. L. Kloos and lady while out riding last evening started to drive across the south Arkansas River bridge. Owing to the bad condition of the approach, the vehicle was upset. Mr. and Mrs. Kloos were thrown out and badly bruised. The buggy was slightly broken.
Arkansas City Traveler, September 29, 1886.
The condition of the two bridges across the Arkansas is the subject of unceasing complaint. Crossing the south bridge is a perilous undertaking and it is feared that some serious accident will soon occur there.
Arkansas City Republican, Saturday, October 23, 1886. From Tuesday’s Daily.
The Representative Question.
The coming political fight in this county is warming up considerably. The pot is fast beginning to boil. The principal contest has narrowed down apparently to which candidate for representative of this district will be elected. Our readers are aware who those are before them seeking the office. The Republican nominee is Hon. L. P. King; the Democratic nominee is F. P. Schiffbauer. The former is of Beaver Township; the latter of this city.
Many of our Democratic readers, who reside in this city, accuse us of a lack of patriotism for Arkansas City because we do not support Mr. Schiffbauer, claiming that Mr. King is a Winfield man and the latter a true blue Sandhiller. We deny this allegation, and of all who have made it, have demanded proof. As yet, not one could furnish it. Some assert that Mr. King does his trading in Winfield. We know this to be false. We have seen Mr. King a number of times buying provisions at our stores and the Daniel Bros., the blacksmiths, inform us that they have been doing all his work in their line for three years past. The truth of the whole matter is, this is a trumped up charge. In fact, it is a Democratic campaign lie made out of whole cloth and one which that party has sprung on every nominee of the Republican party since there has been a rivalry existing between Arkansas City and Winfield. We think it is about time they give us something new. That old taunt is too tame and won’t wash down with the voters of this district. On the other hand, we assert Mr. King to be a strong Arkansas City man. He realizes that if this town is benefitted, he will be also. With this in view he has always labored for his constituents. Right here, we can hear some good old Democratic campaigner remark: “He didn’t do us any good in the legislature; he didn’t even get us a bridge law; we want to send someone there who will do Arkansas City some good.” Well, we reply, he did do us some good in the legislature, and did us no harm. Will you be kind enough to tell us of some one legislator from this district who ever did as any great good since this district has been organized? There never was but one and that was Dr. Leonard. If Mr. King had been a legislator then, he probably would have accomplished the same end for us as Dr. Leonard. The gist of the whole thing then is simmered down to the bridge question. If our memory serves us well, we believe Mr. King in the last legislature made an exceedingly strong fight on this question. Many of our readers are not aware of the facts in the case, and so we repeat them. During the early part of the legislature, Senator Jennings introduced a bridge bill, which it was thought would suit us if it could be made a law. Mr. King refrained from introducing a bill at the time because from a conference of a committee of our prominent citizens he learned that Jennings’ bill would do, and he and they thought best not to antagonize it by introducing another. The bill passed the house, but was defeated in the senate. By the time the fate of this bill was known, the session of the legislature was so far advanced that it was useless to introduce another bill, and it would have been folly to have done so. At the special session Mr. King introduced a bill, which a committee of the city sanctioned as the proper thing, and worked hard for its passage; but it too was defeated. The reason why is very simple. Senator Jennings, Mr. Greer, and Mr. Maurer worked diligently against it. The first is our senator; the remaining two, representatives from districts in this county. We ask who could accomplish the passing of our bridges on the county when the entire remaining delegation from Cowley County was against him? There is no man who could have accomplished the task undertaken by Mr. King.
In regard to sending a man from Arkansas City to the legislature who will do us some good, we will say that by sending Mr. King from this district, more good will be accomplished than by sending Mr. Schiffbauer. The Republican nominee is equally as brilliant, if not a great deal more so, than the Democratic nominee. Then why should the Republicans of Arkansas City disrupt their party by voting for a man who has been in every political organization known, except the prohibition, and has no fixed political principles governing him. He has been in the Republican party; he has been an Independent; he has been in the Labor party; and now he is in the Democratic, so he tells us. Perhaps he is by this time a full fledged “Irishman’s flee,” and will rest content until after the election. Quite likely then he will hop over to the prohibitionists. Again, should the Republicans of this city vote against Mr. King and elect his opponent, a chasm would be created between Arkansas City and the townships of the district. At present the townships and this town are in harmony, and we must keep them so. It is conceded that this district is Republican; and should Schiffbauer be elected, it would be by Republican votes. In the Republican nominating convention, the delegates from the county, excepting Bolton Township, were solid for King and against the gentleman brought out by the city. We might sometime in the future desire to ask for railroad bonds from the townships which are urging Mr. King forward very strongly, and then we would be told to get our favors at the hands of the Democracy. Republicans, we cannot afford to allow this breach to be made. It behooves us all to get out and labor for Mr. King’s election or else we will kill the goose that lays the golden egg. Our prosperity today is principally due to the aid which the surrounding townships have extended us.
Further, if Mr. Schiffbauer should by a chance be elected, what could he do for Arkansas City in a Republican legislature? He would be sent there as a Democrat. His principles would not be in accordance with the powers that be and therefore he would gain no recognition. Mr. King, as before, would be placed on many important committees from the fact that he is a Republican and could there serve Arkansas City, his district, and the State to a greater advantage. Besides, his first term experience would place him on any equal footing with the majority of his brother legislators. In conclusion, we say to Republicans, work and vote for Hon. L. P. King for representative.
Arkansas City Republican, Saturday, October 30, 1886. From Wednesday’s Daily.
Some Democrats claim that if F. P. Schiffbauer should be elected representative, he will accomplish great good in regard to our bridges. Let us see. Some time ago the West Arkansas River Bridge was taken into the city limits, so that the burden of its repairs would not fall so heavily on the shoulders of our merchants. What has he done for the bridge? He has never ordered any repairs, although it has needed them several times. As usual, the merchants have had to go down in their pockets and have the bridge made passable. Mr. Schiffbauer’s bridge record is not very bright, and it will be made no brighter by sending him to the legislature.
Arkansas City Republican, Saturday, November 13, 1886. From Tuesday’s Daily.
The south Arkansas River Bridge is badly in need of repair. A subscription paper is going the rounds. Don’t forget to put your name on the list.
Arkansas City Republican, Saturday, November 27, 1886. From Thursday’s Daily.
Frank Lorry, Jr., while driving to town this morning from Bolton Township, met with quite an accident. After he got a short distance this side of the west bridge, his team became frightened and started to run. Mr. Lorry was walking and driving. He was thrown down and dragged some distance. He received several severe bruises, but nothing dangerous. The team was stopped before any great damage was done to the wagon. Dr. Sparks was called to attend the injured boy.
Arkansas City Republican, Saturday, December 4, 1886. From Monday’s Daily.
As Lew Hilton was returning to his home Saturday evening, in Bolton Township, an attempt to “hold him up” was made by two men near the south canal bridge. It was but a short time after dusk, and as he arrived within a few feet of the bridge, two men suddenly appeared in front of him and commanded him to halt. Instead of obeying, he turned his horse around and laid whip on, coming back to the city. After getting his supper he purchased a revolver and started for home again. He arrived there without being molested.
Arkansas City Traveler, December 29, 1886.
That bridge three miles east of town near F. M. Vaughn’s place is a dangerous place to cross after night or even in the day, and should be repaired for the accommodation of the traveling public.
Excerpt...
Arkansas City Traveler, December 29, 1886.
The advance in real estate comes in most opportunely to help our city fathers out of their financial difficulty. In the spring of 1885 the assessor’s rolls (in round figures) showed taxable property to the amount of $325,000; last spring the valuation was increased to $655,000. The city taxation is as follows.
For general purposes 12 mills
Bond fund 9 mills
Bridges 4 mills
Hydrants 5½ mills
Internal improvements 4 mills
Sinking fund 2 mills
School district 12 mills
School bonds 5 mills
TOTAL: 53 ½ MILLS.
1887
Excerpt...
[ARKANSAS CITY.]
Arkansas City Republican, January 15, 1887.
The city is located on the east side of the Arkansas River, on the high divide between the above and Walnut River, three miles of where the latter flows into the Big Sandy. Two bridges span the Arkansas River, each about 1,000 feet in length here.
Arkansas City Republican, Saturday, January 15, 1887. From Wednesday’s Daily.
In the spring a boating club is to be organized. The Walnut River from Harmon’s Bridge down affords a most excellent place for rowing.
Arkansas City Republican, Saturday, January 22, 1887. From Thursday’s Daily.
The Island Park is being cleared of all debris and will soon be converted into one of the best driving parks in the west. A road leads directly from the mills to the park and the Walnut has been spanned by a temporary bridge concern for the accommodation of sight-seers. About 40 men are at work getting the Island in shape.
Arkansas City Republican, Saturday, March 5, 1887. From Saturday’s Daily.
W. B. Elledge was down from Pleasant Valley today. He dropped into the REPUBLICAN sanctum to order the weekly sent to his father back in Illinois. He also bought in a year’s subscription for Willie Rush, who sends it to his brother in Pennsylvania. Mr. Elledge informs us that the bonds for building a bridge across the Walnut River at the Dunkard mills will not be voted today. When he left this morning, the vote stood 20 to 6 against the bonds. A number of Winfield men were down working against the bonds.
Arkansas City Republican, Saturday, March 26, 1887. From Thursday’s Daily.
A scheme is on foot to bridge the canal at the foot of 8th street; a needed improvement.
Arkansas City Republican, Saturday, March 26, 1887. From Thursday’s Daily.
Fourth Avenue is looking up. $1,000 has been raised to grade it down. At the canal a stone bridge is to be put in by J. B. Quigley.
[This is all that I have on bridges through 1877. MAW]
